Close Go back Collapse all sections
Process Data set: CEM II/B-M (P-LL) 42.5 N (en) en

Key Data Set Information
Location LV
Geographical representativeness description Latvia, Estonia
Reference year 2024
Name
CEM II/B-M (P-LL) 42.5 N
Technical purpose of product or process CEM II/B-M (P-LL) 42.5 N is a hydraulic binder for the production of concrete, dry mortars and for ground stabilization. Portland komposit cement. The cement contains a natural sedimentary pozzolan and limestone as clinker replacement
Classification
Class name : Hierarchy level
  • EPDNorge: Construction / Cement and lime
General comment on data set Data quality: Specific data for the product composition are provided by the manufacturer. The data represent the production of the declared product and were collected for EPD development in the year of study. Background data is based on EPDs according to EN 15804 and different LCA databases. The data quality of the raw materials in A1 is presented in the table below. Allocation: The allocation is made in accordance with the provisions of EN 15804. Incoming energy and water and waste production in-house is allocated equally among all products through mass allocation. The recycling process and transportation of the material is allocated to this analysis. Cut-off criteria: All major raw materials and all the essential energy is included. The production processes for raw materials and energy flows with very small amounts (less than 1%) are not included. These cut-off criteria do not apply for hazardous materials and substances.
Copyright Yes
Owner of data set
Quantitative reference
Reference flow(s)
Biogenic carbon content
  • Carbon content (biogenic): 1.0 kg
  • Carbon content (biogenic) - packaging: 1.0 kg
Time representativeness
Data set valid until 2029
Time representativeness description "2024-04-04" - "2029-04-04"
Technological representativeness
Technology description including background system CEM II/B-M (P-LL) 42.5 N Further technical information on schwenk.lv

Indicators of life cycle

IndicatorDirectionUnit Production
A1-A3
 Transport
A4
Input
  • 256
  • 2.136
Input
  • 0
  • 0
Input
  • 256
  • 2.136
Input
  • 1188
  • 169.8
Input
  • 0
  • 0
Input
  • 1188
  • 169.8
Input
  • 10.2
  • 0
Input
  • 281.8
  • 0.0747
Input
  • 8555
  • 0.2504
Input
  • 0.3696
  • 0.01932
Output
  • 0.1164
  • 0.009289
Output
  • 10.18
  • 14.76
Output
  • 0.005096
  • 0.001159
Output
  • 0
  • 0
Output
  • 0
  • 0
Output
  • 0
  • 0
Output
  • 0
  • 0
Output
  • 0
  • 0

IndicatorUnit Production
A1-A3
 Transport
A4
Abiotic depletion potential - fossil resources (ADPF)
  • 1176
  • 169.8
Abiotic depletion potential - non-fossil resources (ADPE)
  • 0.0009425
  • 0.0001862
Acidification potential, Accumulated Exceedance (AP)
  • 1.632
  • 0.03365
Global Warming Potential - biogenic (GWP-biogenic)
  • 0.5721
  • 0.004477
Global Warming Potential - fossil fuels (GWP-fossil)
  • 578.1
  • 10.45
Global Warming Potential - total (GWP-total)
  • 578.7
  • 10.46
Global Warming Potential - land use and land use change (GWP-luluc)
  • 0.0643
  • 0.003184
  • 578.8
  • 10.46
Eutrophication potential - freshwater (EP-freshwater)
  • 0.001754
  • 0.00008316
Eutrophication potential - marine (EP-marine)
  • 0.607
  • 0.007369
Eutrophication potential - terrestrial (EP-terrestrial)
  • 6.751
  • 0.0822
Photochemical Ozone Creation Potential (POCP)
  • 1.638
  • 0.03228
Depletion potential of the stratospheric ozone layer (ODP)
  • 0.00001211
  • 0.00000252
Water (user) deprivation potential (WDP)
  • 5.728E+4
  • 130.2

IndicatorUnit Production
A1-A3
 Transport
A4
1This impact category deals mainly with the eventual impact of low dose ionizing radiation on human health of the nuclear fuel cycle. It does not consider effects due to possible nuclear accidents, occupational exposure nor due to radioactive waste disposal in underground facilities. Potential ionizing radiation from the soil, from radon and from some construction materials is also not measured by this indicator.
2The results of this environmental impact indicator shall be used with care as the uncertainties on these results are high or as there is limited experiences with the indicator.
Potential Human exposure efficiency relative to U235 (IRP) 1
  • 4.639
  • 0.742
Potential incidence of disease due to PM emissions (PM) 2
  • 0.000008252
  • 9.6E-7
Potential Soil quality index (SQP) 2
  • 828.9
  • 194.6
Potential Comparative Toxic Unit for humans - non-cancer effects (HTP-nc) 2
  • 6E-7
  • 1.2E-7
Potential Comparative Toxic Unit for humans - cancer effects (HTP-c) 2
  • 4.799E-8
  • 0
Potential Comparative Toxic Unit for ecosystems (ETP-fw) 2
  • 1296
  • 124.1