Close Go back Collapse all sections
Process Data set: PVA Primer(QA), Jotun Paints Qatar W.L.L (en) en

Key Data Set Information
Location QA
Geographical representativeness description It covers the regional markets where the product is produced.
Reference year 2026
Name
PVA Primer(QA), Jotun Paints Qatar W.L.L
Use advice for data set The flowchart in the figure below illustrates the system boundaries for the analysis, in accordance with the modular principle on EN 15804+A2. The analysis is a cradle-to-gate (A1-A3) study with options, in addition to module A4, transport to market, modules C1-C4 and module D are included.
Technical purpose of product or process PVA Primer(QA) is an emulsion primer, designed for interior purposes. Based on acrylic copolymer emulsion. Ideal for priming interior surfaces. The material composition of the declared mixed product is given below:
General comment on data set Data quality: Specific data for the product composition are provided by the manufacturer. The data represent the production of the declared product and were collected for EPD development in the year of study. Background data is based on EPDs according to EN 15804 and different LCA databases. The data quality of the raw materials in A1 is presented in the table below. In this EPD we adopted a conservative approach and have utilised electricity data from Saudi Arabia, due to a lack of data for Qatar. Additionally, Qatar and Saudi Arabia have a similar source of energy. This EPD utilises A2 transport data from our Dubai site. As justification, the environmental impacts from transporting raw materials to Jotun factories constitute a small percentage of the product's total footprint and are quite similar across different sites. Therefore, using this data should not significantly impact the total product footprint. Allocation: The allocation is made in accordance with the provisions of EN 15804. Incoming energy and water and waste production in-house is allocated equally among all products through mass allocation. Effects of primary production of recycled materials is allocated to the main product in which the material was used. The recycling process and transportation of the material is allocated to this analysis. Cut-off criteria: All major raw materials and all the essential energy is included. The production processes for raw materials and energy flows with very small amounts (less than 1%) are not included.
Copyright Yes
Owner of data set
Quantitative reference
Reference flow(s)
Biogenic carbon content
  • Carbon content (biogenic): 0.0 kg
  • Carbon content (biogenic) - packaging: 0.002334547872 kg
Time representativeness
Data set valid until 2031
Technological representativeness
Technology description including background system Density: 1.3 g/cm³ Solids by volume: 21 ± 2 volume% Film thickness per coat: Dry film thickness: 15 - 25 µm Wet film thickness: 70 - 120 µm Theoretical spreading rate: 14 - 8.5 m²/l The formulation chosen for this specific manufacturing site is that with highest raw material GWP-total (A1). This conservative approach allows the EPD to be representative for products with a selection of colours. The product packaging is based on an average sized metal packaging, including secondary packaging such as pallets and plastic wrapping. For safety, health and environmental conditions, see the Safety Data Sheet for the declared product on www.jotun.com. For information on technical data, application and use of the product, see the Technical Data Sheet for the declared product on www.jotun.com.

Indicators of life cycle

IndicatorDirectionUnit Raw material supply
A1
Transport
A2
Manufacturing
A3
Transport
A4
De-construction
C1
Transport
C2
Waste processing
C3
Disposal
C4
Recycling Potential
D
Input
  • 1.283
  • 0.005498
  • 0.008923
  • 0.004254
  • 0
  • 0.0004197
  • 0
  • 0.001652
  • 0
Input
  • 0.07875
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
Input
  • 1.362
  • 0.005498
  • 0.008923
  • 0.004254
  • 0
  • 0.0004197
  • 0
  • 0.001652
  • 0
Input
  • 12.7
  • 0.5903
  • 1.175
  • 0.3103
  • 0
  • 0.03061
  • 0
  • 0.1418
  • 0
Input
  • 0.088
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
Input
  • 12.78
  • 0.5903
  • 1.175
  • 0.3103
  • 0
  • 0.03061
  • 0
  • 0.1418
  • 0
Input
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0.000018
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0.00001568
  • 0
Input
  • 0.01051
  • 0.000001325
  • 0.00004736
  • 0.00000168
  • 0
  • 1.657E-7
  • 0
  • 0.00005325
  • 0
Input
  • 0.06944
  • 0
  • 0.0004386
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0.0002069
  • 0
Input
  • 0.2072
  • 0.00005356
  • -0.0004832
  • 0.00004668
  • 0
  • 0.000004605
  • 0
  • 0.0000706
  • 0
Output
  • 0.009405
  • 0.0008405
  • 0.002651
  • 0.0005235
  • 0
  • 0.00005164
  • 0
  • 0.000008761
  • 0
Output
  • 0.7157
  • 0.01272
  • 0.07111
  • 0.009689
  • 0
  • 0.0009558
  • 0
  • 0.3967
  • 0
Output
  • 0.00001219
  • 0.00003487
  • 1.641E-7
  • 0.00006605
  • 0
  • 0.000006516
  • 0
  • 9.52E-7
  • 0
Output
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
Output
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0.0266
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0.00001472
  • 0
Output
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0.0008488
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 1.19E-7
  • 0
Output
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0.000516
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0.000001028
  • 0
Output
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0.007803
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0.00001556
  • 0

IndicatorUnit Raw material supply
A1
Transport
A2
Manufacturing
A3
Transport
A4
De-construction
C1
Transport
C2
Waste processing
C3
Disposal
C4
Recycling Potential
D
Abiotic depletion potential - fossil resources (ADPF)
  • 11.44
  • 0.5903
  • 1.175
  • 0.3102
  • 0
  • 0.0306
  • 0
  • 0.1417
  • 0
Abiotic depletion potential - non-fossil resources (ADPE)
  • 0.00002002
  • 6.556E-8
  • 2.818E-7
  • 5.971E-8
  • 0
  • 5.891E-9
  • 0
  • 1.697E-7
  • 0
Acidification potential, Accumulated Exceedance (AP)
  • 0.004902
  • 0.001072
  • 0.0004735
  • 0.00008845
  • 0
  • 0.000008725
  • 0
  • 0.00004239
  • 0
Global Warming Potential - biogenic (GWP-biogenic)
  • -0.001997
  • 0.000008313
  • 0.0001744
  • 0.000004601
  • 0
  • 4.539E-7
  • 0
  • 0.000003657
  • 0
Global Warming Potential - fossil fuels (GWP-fossil)
  • 0.7589
  • 0.04607
  • 0.09431
  • 0.02124
  • 0
  • 0.002095
  • 0
  • 0.007634
  • 0
Global Warming Potential - total (GWP-total)
  • 0.7589
  • 0.0461
  • 0.0945
  • 0.02126
  • 0
  • 0.002097
  • 0
  • 0.00764
  • 0
Global Warming Potential - land use and land use change (GWP-luluc)
  • 0.001985
  • 0.00002394
  • 0.00001025
  • 0.000009625
  • 0
  • 9.495E-7
  • 0
  • 0.000002522
  • 0
  • 0.4109
  • 0.04609
  • 0.08975
  • 0.02126
  • 0
  • 0.002097
  • 0
  • 0.00764
  • 0
Eutrophication potential - freshwater (EP-freshwater)
  • 0.0001047
  • 0.000001967
  • 0.000003255
  • 0.000001656
  • 0
  • 1.634E-7
  • 0
  • 6.689E-8
  • 0
Eutrophication potential - marine (EP-marine)
  • 0.0007831
  • 0.0002722
  • 0.0001117
  • 0.00003223
  • 0
  • 0.000003179
  • 0
  • 0.0000135
  • 0
Eutrophication potential - terrestrial (EP-terrestrial)
  • 0.008539
  • 0.00302
  • 0.001052
  • 0.0003512
  • 0
  • 0.00003465
  • 0
  • 0.0001491
  • 0
Photochemical Ozone Creation Potential (POCP)
  • 0.0029
  • 0.0008356
  • 0.0005341
  • 0.0001286
  • 0
  • 0.00001268
  • 0
  • 0.00004447
  • 0
Depletion potential of the stratospheric ozone layer (ODP)
  • 3.825E-8
  • 2.1E-10
  • 1.835E-9
  • 3.98E-10
  • 0
  • 3.9E-11
  • 0
  • 2.121E-9
  • 0
Water (user) deprivation potential (WDP)
  • 12.6
  • 0.001996
  • 0.07691
  • 0.001532
  • 0
  • 0.0001511
  • 0
  • 0.0979
  • 0

IndicatorUnit Raw material supply
A1
Transport
A2
Manufacturing
A3
Transport
A4
De-construction
C1
Transport
C2
Waste processing
C3
Disposal
C4
Recycling Potential
D
1This impact category deals mainly with the eventual impact of low dose ionizing radiation on human health of the nuclear fuel cycle. It does not consider effects due to possible nuclear accidents, occupational exposure nor due to radioactive waste disposal in underground facilities. Potential ionizing radiation from the soil, from radon and from some construction materials is also not measured by this indicator.
2The results of this environmental impact indicator shall be used with care as the uncertainties on these results are high or as there is limited experiences with the indicator.
Potential Human exposure efficiency relative to U235 (IRP) 1
  • 0.04109
  • 0.000334
  • 0.0003251
  • 0.0002699
  • 0
  • 0.00002662
  • 0
  • 0.000604
  • 0
Potential incidence of disease due to PM emissions (PM) 2
  • 0.01243
  • 1.156E-9
  • 3.598E-9
  • 2.189E-9
  • 0
  • 2.16E-10
  • 0
  • 7.82E-10
  • 0
Potential Soil quality index (SQP) 2
  • 3.126
  • 0.1977
  • 0.1217
  • 0.3127
  • 0
  • 0.03085
  • 0
  • 0.176
  • 0
Potential Comparative Toxic Unit for humans - non-cancer effects (HTP-nc) 2
  • 0.3409
  • 1.05E-10
  • 1.456E-9
  • 1.99E-10
  • 0
  • 2E-11
  • 0
  • 9.3E-11
  • 0
Potential Comparative Toxic Unit for humans - cancer effects (HTP-c) 2
  • 2.202
  • 0
  • 3.1E-11
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 1E-12
  • 0
Potential Comparative Toxic Unit for ecosystems (ETP-fw) 2
  • 17.8
  • 0.05441
  • 0.3959
  • 0.04365
  • 0
  • 0.004306
  • 0
  • 0.09599
  • 0