Close Go back Collapse all sections
Process Data set: Gap Cafe easy chair (en) en

Key Data Set Information
Location SE
Geographical representativeness description Worldwide
Reference year 2025
Name
Gap Cafe easy chair
Technical purpose of product or process Gap café is a modular system that can be built according to your wishes and needs. The name Gap is derived from the gap between the seat and back/armrest and makes Gap a winner from an cleaning point of view. The Gap family is known for its straight lines and plain colors. Flexibility is the keyword and only the imagination sets limits to what formations can be built with Gap. With a mix of round and straight parts that can be connected together, armrests and tables that can be added. The small details make a big difference. The system is available in a number of standard modules, but it is also possible to order bespoke in desired lengths. The sofas are available with wooden legs in oak or ash. It is also available with metal stands in the colors chrome, white or black, other colors on request. The café sofas have a seat height of 45 cm and is optimal for tables with a height of 60-72 cm. The model studied in this declaration is Gap Cafe easy chair with wooden legs in ash and 100% recycled polyester fabric , including packaging. This EPD includes the following variants: Gap Cafe 2-seats soffa with wooden legs in ash and 100% recycled polyester fabric , including packaging. Gap Cafe 3-seats soffa with wooden legs in ash and 100% recycled polyester fabric , including packaging. The key environmental indicators for these variants are presented on a table at page 11 of this declaration. If you are interested in the specific EPD-protocol for the variants, please contact us by info@swedese.se
Classification
Class name : Hierarchy level
  • EPDNorge: Furniture / Soft seating
General comment on data set Data quality: Specific data for the product composition are provided by the manufacturer. They represent the production of the declared product and were collected for EPD development in the year of study. Background data is based on registered EPDs according to EN 15804, Ostfold Research databases, ecoinvent and other LCA databases. The data quality of the raw materials in A1 is presented in the table below. Allocation: The allocation is made in accordance with the provisions of EN 15804. Incoming energy and water and waste production in-house is allocated equally among all products through mass allocation. Effects of primary production of recycled materials is allocated to the main product in which the material was used. The recycling process and transportation of the material is allocated to this analysis. Cut-off criteria: All major raw materials and all the essential energy is included. The production processes for raw materials and energy flows with very small amounts (less than 1%) are not included. These cut-off criteria do not apply for hazardous materials and substances.
Copyright Yes
Owner of data set
Quantitative reference
Reference flow(s)
Biogenic carbon content
  • Carbon content (biogenic): 8.87283248852 kg
  • Carbon content (biogenic) - packaging: 1.7129629631 kg
Time representativeness
Data set valid until 2030
Time representativeness description 2025-03-31 - 2030-03-31
Technological representativeness

Indicators of life cycle

IndicatorDirectionUnit Production
A1-A3
Transport
A4
Installation
A5
Maintenance
B2
Repair
B3
Replacement
B4
De-construction
C1
Transport
C2
Waste processing
C3
Disposal
C4
Recycling Potential
D
Input
  • 635.6
  • 0.2736
  • 0.01527
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0.1323
  • 1.849
  • 0.1486
  • -298.1
Input
  • 267.3
  • 0
  • -38.76
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • -305.7
  • 0
  • 0
Input
  • 902.8
  • 0.2736
  • -38.75
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0.1323
  • -303.9
  • 0.1486
  • -298.1
Input
  • 1069
  • 19.12
  • 0.8962
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 9.24
  • 15.05
  • 1.506
  • -50.24
Input
  • 132.1
  • 0
  • -7.645
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • -128.5
  • 0
  • 0
Input
  • 1202
  • 19.12
  • -6.748
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 9.24
  • -113.5
  • 1.506
  • -50.24
Input
  • 3.396
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
Input
  • 1.684
  • 0.00979
  • 0.0004961
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0.004732
  • 0.04107
  • 0.002871
  • -0.04355
Input
  • 3.178
  • 0.035
  • 0.001987
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0.01692
  • 0
  • 0.1803
  • -17.41
Input
  • 1.369
  • 0.002044
  • 0.0004262
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0.0009881
  • 0.0256
  • 0.002242
  • -0.3593
Output
  • 0.2505
  • 0.0009859
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0.0004765
  • 0
  • 1.053
  • -0.003509
Output
  • 9.78
  • 0.9297
  • 3.88
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0.4493
  • 1
  • 0.8398
  • -1.237
Output
  • 0.008976
  • 0.0001302
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0.00006294
  • 0
  • 0.000002865
  • -0.0002519
Output
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
Output
  • 0
  • 0
  • 3.534
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0.2714
  • 0
  • 0
Output
  • 0.2171
  • 0
  • 0.00001404
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 31.36
  • 0
  • 0
Output
  • 0.129
  • 0
  • 0.2116
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 22.91
  • 0
  • 0
Output
  • 1.952
  • 0
  • 3.202
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 346.7
  • 0
  • 0

IndicatorUnit Production
A1-A3
Transport
A4
Installation
A5
Maintenance
B2
Repair
B3
Replacement
B4
De-construction
C1
Transport
C2
Waste processing
C3
Disposal
C4
Recycling Potential
D
Abiotic depletion potential - fossil resources (ADPF)
  • 1199
  • 19.12
  • 0.8961
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 9.239
  • 15.02
  • 1.505
  • -50.25
Abiotic depletion potential - non-fossil resources (ADPE)
  • 0.001502
  • 0.00003492
  • 0.000001533
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0.00001688
  • 0.00001043
  • 6.882E-7
  • -0.00003767
Acidification potential, Accumulated Exceedance (AP)
  • 0.267
  • 0.003633
  • 0.000301
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0.001756
  • 0.01416
  • 0.0006128
  • -0.02897
Global Warming Potential - biogenic (GWP-biogenic)
  • -38.01
  • 0.0005233
  • 6.281
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0.0002529
  • 43.42
  • 0.0001308
  • -0.007096
Global Warming Potential - fossil fuels (GWP-fossil)
  • 47.36
  • 1.264
  • 0.07411
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0.6111
  • 11.08
  • 0.2639
  • -3.612
Global Warming Potential - total (GWP-total)
  • 9.776
  • 1.265
  • 6.355
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0.6115
  • 54.51
  • 0.264
  • -3.735
Global Warming Potential - land use and land use change (GWP-luluc)
  • 0.4246
  • 0.00045
  • 0.00002089
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0.0002175
  • 0.0006532
  • 0.00002882
  • -0.1163
  • 48.53
  • 1.265
  • 0.07413
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0.6115
  • 13.13
  • 0.2749
  • -3.803
Eutrophication potential - freshwater (EP-freshwater)
  • 0.002767
  • 0.0000101
  • 5.208E-7
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0.000004882
  • 0.00006088
  • 0.000002729
  • -0.0003144
Eutrophication potential - marine (EP-marine)
  • 0.05711
  • 0.0007189
  • 0.0001098
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0.0003475
  • 0.006455
  • 0.0001702
  • -0.009331
Eutrophication potential - terrestrial (EP-terrestrial)
  • 0.6317
  • 0.008042
  • 0.001078
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0.003887
  • 0.06494
  • 0.001972
  • -0.1007
Photochemical Ozone Creation Potential (POCP)
  • 0.1894
  • 0.003081
  • 0.0003124
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0.001489
  • 0.01589
  • 0.0005488
  • -0.02829
Depletion potential of the stratospheric ozone layer (ODP)
  • 0.00000569
  • 2.864E-7
  • 1.349E-8
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 1.384E-7
  • 3.196E-7
  • 1.652E-8
  • -0.2457
Water (user) deprivation potential (WDP)
  • 5.084E+4
  • 18.49
  • 1.269
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 8.937
  • 49.73
  • 30.1
  • -588.3

IndicatorUnit Production
A1-A3
Transport
A4
Installation
A5
Maintenance
B2
Repair
B3
Replacement
B4
De-construction
C1
Transport
C2
Waste processing
C3
Disposal
C4
Recycling Potential
D
1This impact category deals mainly with the eventual impact of low dose ionizing radiation on human health of the nuclear fuel cycle. It does not consider effects due to possible nuclear accidents, occupational exposure nor due to radioactive waste disposal in underground facilities. Potential ionizing radiation from the soil, from radon and from some construction materials is also not measured by this indicator.
2The results of this environmental impact indicator shall be used with care as the uncertainties on these results are high or as there is limited experiences with the indicator.
Potential Human exposure efficiency relative to U235 (IRP) 1
  • 18.02
  • 0.08355
  • 0.003848
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0.04038
  • 0.05204
  • 0.007899
  • -0.3073
Potential incidence of disease due to PM emissions (PM) 2
  • 0.000004726
  • 7.74E-8
  • 4.497E-9
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 3.741E-8
  • 1.152E-7
  • 5.366E-9
  • -0.000001704
Potential Soil quality index (SQP) 2
  • 2216
  • 13.37
  • 0.6644
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 6.463
  • 4.387
  • 4.284
  • -322.7
Potential Comparative Toxic Unit for humans - non-cancer effects (HTP-nc) 2
  • 9.176E-7
  • 1.548E-8
  • 1.455E-9
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 7.482E-9
  • 8.025E-8
  • 7.16E-9
  • -2.265E-7
Potential Comparative Toxic Unit for humans - cancer effects (HTP-c) 2
  • 1.258E-7
  • 0
  • 3.4E-11
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 3.59E-9
  • 1.94E-10
  • -5.953E-9
Potential Comparative Toxic Unit for ecosystems (ETP-fw) 2
  • 2003
  • 14.17
  • 1.173
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 6.849
  • 70.49
  • 3.722
  • -275.7