Close Go back Collapse all sections
Process Data set: NorDan NTech Villa Balcony door (security) - TE 105/80 (Without Aluminium Cladding) (en) en

Key Data Set Information
Location PL
Geographical representativeness description Europe, but scenarios beyond cradle-to-gate are based on the situation in the Norwegian market.
Reference year 2024
Name
NorDan NTech Villa Balcony door (security) - TE 105/80 (Without Aluminium Cladding)
Technical purpose of product or process Door for use in exterior walls of domestic and commercial buildings. NorDan NTech Villa Balcony door (security) - TE in size 1230x2180 mm is covered in this EPD. Wooden door without aluminium cladding. Triple glazed unit with tempered glass on the inside/outside 4E# + 16G + 4 + 16G + #E4
Classification
Class name : Hierarchy level
  • EPDNorge: Construction / Doors and windows
General comment on data set Data quality: Specific data for the product composition are provided by the manufacturer. The data represent the production of the declared product and were collected for EPD development in the year of study. Background data is based on EPDs according to EN 15804 and different LCA databases. The data quality of the raw materials in A1 is presented in the table below. Material quantities of the specified product in reference size have been calculated by NorDan's business system. The production data was collected in 2021 and is an average for 2020 Allocation: The allocation is made in accordance with the provisions of EN 15804. Effects of primary production of recycled materials is allocated to the main product in which the material was used. The recycling process and transportation of the material is allocated to this analysis. The PCR specific background data follow the allocation rules in the Ecoinvent v3.7.1 Cut-off database version. The allocation of water, energy and waste flows within the production facilities for windows and doors follows unit-based allocation adjusted with a point system to different product groups or products. This score system is regulated by a factor which increases with the resource intensity of each product. The unit-based allocation is adjusted by the weight of the product, excluding the weight of glass. Cut-off criteria: All major raw materials and all the essential energy is included. The production processes for raw materials and energy flows with very small amounts (less than 1%) are not included. These cut-off criteria do not apply for hazardous materials and substances.
Copyright Yes
Owner of data set
Quantitative reference
Reference flow(s)
Biogenic carbon content
  • Carbon content (biogenic): 18.050371109863 kg
  • Carbon content (biogenic) - packaging: 1.76846009312 kg
Time representativeness
Data set valid until 2029
Time representativeness description 2024-10-09 - 2029-10-09
Technological representativeness
Technology description including background system Outward opening door. Triple glazed, 105mm frame, 80mm leaf. U-value 0,85 W/m2K. Certified: BBA - British Board of Agrément, Secured by Design, DVV, RISE P-marked production. The total weight of the product is 99,23 kg. The packaging has an average weight of 4,44 kg. Area of functional unit 2,68 m2. Conversion factor is 0,373 for 1 m2.

Indicators of life cycle

IndicatorDirectionUnit Production
A1-A3
Transport
A4
Installation
A5
Maintenance
B2
Replacement
B4
De-construction
C1
Transport
C2
Waste processing
C3
Disposal
C4
Recycling Potential
D
Input
  • 386.8
  • 2.379
  • 0.00264
  • 8.552
  • 389.2
  • 0
  • 0.1502
  • 2.172
  • 0.314
  • -222.7
Input
  • 531.8
  • 0
  • -60.21
  • 0
  • 471.6
  • 0
  • 0
  • -470.7
  • 0
  • 0
Input
  • 918.6
  • 2.379
  • -60.21
  • 8.552
  • 860.8
  • 0
  • 0.1502
  • -468.5
  • 0.3138
  • -222.7
Input
  • 2711
  • 200.2
  • 0.1284
  • 85.3
  • 2911
  • 0
  • 10.47
  • 17.2
  • 16.93
  • -72.25
Input
  • 134.9
  • 0
  • -4.247
  • 0
  • 130.6
  • 0
  • 0
  • -130.5
  • 0
  • 0
Input
  • 2846
  • 200.2
  • -4.119
  • 85.3
  • 3042
  • 0
  • 10.47
  • -113.3
  • 16.93
  • -72.25
Input
  • 0.2344
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0.2344
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
Input
  • 4.724
  • 0.08177
  • 0.00007688
  • 0.03414
  • 4.806
  • 0
  • 0.005347
  • 0.04528
  • 0.00832
  • -0.005451
Input
  • 5.067
  • 0.2618
  • 0.0005699
  • 0.01371
  • 5.329
  • 0
  • 0.01878
  • 0
  • 0.3588
  • -11.46
Input
  • 4.164
  • 0.021
  • 0.00007451
  • 0.2502
  • 4.185
  • 0
  • 0.001185
  • 0.02521
  • 0.01527
  • -0.3152
Output
  • 3.262
  • 0.01055
  • 0
  • 0.02608
  • 3.273
  • 0
  • 0.0005647
  • 0
  • 66.26
  • 0.003056
Output
  • 43.08
  • 14.73
  • 0.443
  • 1.202
  • 58.25
  • 0
  • 0.6491
  • 59.39
  • 0.6045
  • -1.893
Output
  • 0.008905
  • 0.001371
  • 0
  • 0.0002369
  • 0.01028
  • 0
  • 0.00007122
  • 0
  • 0.0001042
  • -0.0002976
Output
  • 0
  • 0
  • 3.99
  • 0
  • 3.99
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
Output
  • 1.563
  • 0
  • 0.1792
  • 0
  • 1.742
  • 0
  • 0
  • 1.577
  • 0
  • 0
Output
  • 2.045
  • 0
  • 0.2132
  • 0
  • 2.258
  • 0
  • 0
  • 101.3
  • 0
  • 0
Output
  • 0.2591
  • 0
  • 0.1489
  • 0.3836
  • 0.408
  • 0
  • 0
  • 27.52
  • 0
  • 0
Output
  • 3.274
  • 0
  • 2.253
  • 2.661
  • 5.527
  • 0
  • 0
  • 416.4
  • 0
  • 0

IndicatorUnit Production
A1-A3
Transport
A4
Installation
A5
Maintenance
B2
Replacement
B4
De-construction
C1
Transport
C2
Waste processing
C3
Disposal
C4
Recycling Potential
D
Abiotic depletion potential - fossil resources (ADPF)
  • 2868
  • 200.2
  • 0.1284
  • 84.53
  • 3068
  • 0
  • 10.47
  • 17.2
  • 16.93
  • -72.26
Abiotic depletion potential - non-fossil resources (ADPE)
  • 0.005397
  • 0.0002142
  • 1.855E-7
  • 0.00006779
  • 0.005611
  • 0
  • 0.00001767
  • 0.000006951
  • 0.00001279
  • -0.00003738
Acidification potential, Accumulated Exceedance (AP)
  • 1.691
  • 0.1005
  • 0.00006421
  • 0.03475
  • 1.792
  • 0
  • 0.003887
  • 0.01512
  • 0.005232
  • -0.04046
Global Warming Potential - biogenic (GWP-biogenic)
  • -49.69
  • 0.005134
  • 6.483
  • 0.01338
  • -43.2
  • 0
  • 0.0002928
  • 45.1
  • 0.0005545
  • -0.01621
Global Warming Potential - fossil fuels (GWP-fossil)
  • 228.4
  • 12.81
  • 0.0156
  • 4.54
  • 241.3
  • 0
  • 0.6821
  • 13.7
  • 0.7398
  • -5.72
Global Warming Potential - total (GWP-total)
  • 178.9
  • 12.82
  • 6.499
  • 5.045
  • 198.3
  • 0
  • 0.6827
  • 58.8
  • 0.7405
  • -5.864
Global Warming Potential - land use and land use change (GWP-luluc)
  • 0.2099
  • 0.004588
  • 0.000002743
  • 0.4911
  • 0.2145
  • 0
  • 0.0002415
  • 0.0004023
  • 0.0002233
  • -0.1272
  • 237
  • 12.82
  • 0.0156
  • 5.044
  • 249.8
  • 0
  • 0.6827
  • 13.69
  • 0.7435
  • -6.213
Eutrophication potential - freshwater (EP-freshwater)
  • 0.0126
  • 0.00009364
  • 1.003E-7
  • 0.0002274
  • 0.01269
  • 0
  • 0.000005614
  • 0.00002124
  • 0.00000737
  • -0.0003641
Eutrophication potential - marine (EP-marine)
  • 0.2697
  • 0.02398
  • 0.00003129
  • 0.004863
  • 0.2937
  • 0
  • 0.00139
  • 0.006972
  • 0.001866
  • -0.00946
Eutrophication potential - terrestrial (EP-terrestrial)
  • 3.11
  • 0.2668
  • 0.000275
  • 0.0394
  • 3.377
  • 0
  • 0.01532
  • 0.07061
  • 0.02059
  • -0.1021
Photochemical Ozone Creation Potential (POCP)
  • 0.8814
  • 0.08013
  • 0.00007437
  • 0.02214
  • 0.9616
  • 0
  • 0.00438
  • 0.018
  • 0.005942
  • -0.0316
Depletion potential of the stratospheric ozone layer (ODP)
  • 0.00002211
  • 0.000002995
  • 1.821E-9
  • 4.856E-7
  • 0.00002511
  • 0
  • 1.555E-7
  • 2.298E-7
  • 2.289E-7
  • -0.1743
Water (user) deprivation potential (WDP)
  • 3238
  • 141.3
  • 0.2506
  • 46.34
  • 3.38E+3
  • 0
  • 9.926
  • 65.03
  • 33.41
  • -1712

IndicatorUnit Production
A1-A3
Transport
A4
Installation
A5
Maintenance
B2
Replacement
B4
De-construction
C1
Transport
C2
Waste processing
C3
Disposal
C4
Recycling Potential
D
1This impact category deals mainly with the eventual impact of low dose ionizing radiation on human health of the nuclear fuel cycle. It does not consider effects due to possible nuclear accidents, occupational exposure nor due to radioactive waste disposal in underground facilities. Potential ionizing radiation from the soil, from radon and from some construction materials is also not measured by this indicator.
2The results of this environmental impact indicator shall be used with care as the uncertainties on these results are high or as there is limited experiences with the indicator.
Potential Human exposure efficiency relative to U235 (IRP) 1
  • 7.908
  • 0.8732
  • 0.000515
  • 0.2014
  • 8.781
  • 0
  • 0.04577
  • 0.0584
  • 0.06804
  • -0.344
Potential incidence of disease due to PM emissions (PM) 2
  • 0.00001746
  • 0.000001021
  • 8.71E-10
  • 1.966E-7
  • 0.00001848
  • 0
  • 6.22E-8
  • 2.308E-7
  • 9.575E-8
  • -0.00000144
Potential Soil quality index (SQP) 2
  • 1.256E+4
  • 197.5
  • 0.1141
  • 45.88
  • 1.275E+4
  • 0
  • 8.963
  • 5.737
  • 36.76
  • -229.6
Potential Comparative Toxic Unit for humans - non-cancer effects (HTP-nc) 2
  • 0.000005044
  • 1.43E-7
  • 4.7E-10
  • 6.941E-8
  • 0.000005188
  • 0
  • 1.037E-8
  • 9.942E-8
  • 9.482E-9
  • -1.431E-7
Potential Comparative Toxic Unit for humans - cancer effects (HTP-c) 2
  • 4.228E-7
  • 0
  • 1E-11
  • 6.594E-9
  • 4.228E-7
  • 0
  • 0
  • 7.596E-9
  • 3.57E-10
  • -1.41E-8
Potential Comparative Toxic Unit for ecosystems (ETP-fw) 2
  • 6811
  • 142.3
  • 0.1378
  • 93.66
  • 6953
  • 0
  • 7.83
  • 76.04
  • 9.982
  • -276.8