Close Go back Collapse all sections
Process Data set: Profim Decenta (en) en

Key Data Set Information
Location PL
Geographical representativeness description Worldwide
Reference year 2025
Name
Profim Decenta
Technical purpose of product or process Decenta, designed by Maja Ganszyniec for Profim, is a family of sofas and tables combining minimalist form with exceptional comfort. The characteristically lowered seat with precise stitching and slender legs gives Decenta a distinctive, light character. The multi-layered filling system ensures unparalleled softness, bringing a homely atmosphere to office spaces. The model analyzed in detail in this declaration is the Profim Decenta 10 H with metal legs, upholstered in Xtreme from Camira, including packaging. Key environmental indicators for other models and options of the Profim Decenta are presented in tables on page 12 of this declaration.
Classification
Class name : Hierarchy level
  • EPDNorge: Furniture / Soft seating
General comment on data set Data quality: Specific data for the product composition are provided by the manufacturer. They represent the production of the declared product and were collected for EPD development in the year of study. Background data is based on registered EPDs according to EN 15804, Ostfold Research databases, ecoinvent and other LCA databases. The data quality of the raw materials in A1 is presented in the table below. Allocation: The allocation is made in accordance with the provisions of EN 15804. Incoming energy and water and waste production in-house is allocated equally among all products through mass allocation. Effects of primary production of recycled materials is allocated to the main product in which the material was used. The recycling process and transportation of the material is allocated to this analysis. Cut-off criteria: All major raw materials and all the essential energy is included. The production processes for raw materials and energy flows with very small amounts (less than 1%) are not included. These cut-off criteria do not apply for hazardous materials and substances.
Copyright Yes
Owner of data set
Quantitative reference
Reference flow(s)
Biogenic carbon content
  • Carbon content (biogenic): 9.422036635373 kg
  • Carbon content (biogenic) - packaging: 4.399495108661 kg
Time representativeness
Data set valid until 2030
Time representativeness description 2025-08-18 - 2030-08-18
Technological representativeness
Technology description including background system Decenta is constructed for durability and comfort, combining a solid wooden seat frame with wave springs and multi-layered foam. The backrest and armrests are shaped with high-resilience polyurethane and wrapped in hypoallergenic SkyFill™ fibre, offering long-term support and softness. The slim, powder-coated metal frame provides visual lightness and structural stability. Designed for modern interiors, Decenta balances refined aesthetics with contract-grade performance — ideal for office, lounge, and hospitality spaces.

Indicators of life cycle

IndicatorDirectionUnit Production
A1-A3
Transport
A4
Installation
A5
Maintenance
B2
Repair
B3
Replacement
B4
De-construction
C1
Transport
C2
Waste processing
C3
Disposal
C4
Recycling Potential
D
Input
  • 643.4
  • 0.8655
  • 0.03976
  • 19.88
  • 0.9053
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0.1466
  • 0.6684
  • 0.0518
  • -197
Input
  • 311.9
  • 0
  • -92.31
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • -221
  • 0
  • 0
Input
  • 955.3
  • 0.8655
  • -92.27
  • 19.88
  • 0.9053
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0.1466
  • -220.3
  • 0.0518
  • -197
Input
  • 1269
  • 68.76
  • 2.323
  • 108.3
  • 4.876
  • 0
  • 0
  • 10.39
  • 10.12
  • 1.767
  • -53.08
Input
  • 273.4
  • 0
  • -21.17
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • -315.5
  • 0
  • 0
Input
  • 1542
  • 68.76
  • -18.85
  • 108.3
  • 4.876
  • 0
  • 0
  • 10.39
  • -305.4
  • 1.767
  • -53.08
Input
  • 9.737
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • -0.0001977
Input
  • 1.767
  • 0.03027
  • 0.001289
  • 1.383
  • 0.06265
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0.005249
  • 0.01508
  • 0.001249
  • 0.05781
Input
  • 1.5
  • 0.1015
  • 0.00514
  • 0.3697
  • 0.01507
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0.01874
  • 0
  • 0.1265
  • -8.893
Input
  • 2.158
  • 0.00783
  • 0.001106
  • 0.8694
  • 0.00399
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0.001094
  • 0.02557
  • 0.001684
  • -0.2405
Output
  • 0.6032
  • 0.003764
  • 0
  • 0.01871
  • 0.0008389
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0.00053
  • 0
  • 6.022
  • -0.01476
Output
  • 20.53
  • 5.981
  • 10.03
  • 0.4238
  • 0.01731
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0.4967
  • 0.368
  • 0.2888
  • -1.79
Output
  • 0.004193
  • 0.0004694
  • 0
  • 0.0007213
  • 0.00003265
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0.00007086
  • 0
  • 0.00001013
  • -0.0001585
Output
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
Output
  • 0.8328
  • 0
  • 9.109
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 2.932
  • 0
  • -0.00002662
Output
  • 0.000006605
  • 0
  • 0.002297
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 38.61
  • 0
  • -0.000003211
Output
  • 0.4604
  • 0
  • 0.5435
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 24.5
  • 0
  • -0.00002021
Output
  • 6.966
  • 0
  • 8.223
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 370.6
  • 0
  • -0.0003057

IndicatorUnit Production
A1-A3
Transport
A4
Installation
A5
Maintenance
B2
Repair
B3
Replacement
B4
De-construction
C1
Transport
C2
Waste processing
C3
Disposal
C4
Recycling Potential
D
Abiotic depletion potential - fossil resources (ADPF)
  • 1539
  • 68.76
  • 2.323
  • 108.1
  • 4.869
  • 0
  • 0
  • 10.39
  • 10.04
  • 1.766
  • -53.09
Abiotic depletion potential - non-fossil resources (ADPE)
  • 0.003915
  • 0.00007549
  • 0.000003964
  • 0.0000434
  • 0.000001689
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0.00001867
  • 0.000005657
  • 0.000001265
  • -0.00008163
Acidification potential, Accumulated Exceedance (AP)
  • 0.5609
  • 0.01858
  • 0.0007795
  • 0.03219
  • 0.00144
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0.002817
  • 0.01536
  • 0.0005741
  • -0.03112
Global Warming Potential - biogenic (GWP-biogenic)
  • -49.11
  • 0.001814
  • 16.13
  • 0.0361
  • 0.001618
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0.000281
  • 41
  • 0.00009395
  • -0.005984
Global Warming Potential - fossil fuels (GWP-fossil)
  • 94.77
  • 4.42
  • 0.1956
  • 5.62
  • 0.2516
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0.6892
  • 14.42
  • 0.1085
  • -4.762
Global Warming Potential - total (GWP-total)
  • 45.93
  • 4.423
  • 16.33
  • 5.668
  • 0.2538
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0.6897
  • 55.43
  • 0.1086
  • -4.845
Global Warming Potential - land use and land use change (GWP-luluc)
  • 0.2673
  • 0.001291
  • 0.00005405
  • 0.01266
  • 0.0005745
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0.0002409
  • 0.0002742
  • 0.00002483
  • -0.07728
  • 96.08
  • 4.423
  • 0.1956
  • 5.988
  • 0.2688
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0.6897
  • 21.22
  • 0.1224
  • -4.811
Eutrophication potential - freshwater (EP-freshwater)
  • 0.006183
  • 0.00003371
  • 0.000001348
  • 0.0005475
  • 0.00002473
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0.000005412
  • 0.00002372
  • 0.00000116
  • -0.0003552
Eutrophication potential - marine (EP-marine)
  • 0.1454
  • 0.005587
  • 0.000288
  • 0.004311
  • 0.000191
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0.0008355
  • 0.007945
  • 0.0001969
  • -0.008586
Eutrophication potential - terrestrial (EP-terrestrial)
  • 1.309
  • 0.06179
  • 0.002791
  • 0.0522
  • 0.002318
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0.00924
  • 0.07833
  • 0.002196
  • -0.09133
Photochemical Ozone Creation Potential (POCP)
  • 0.4383
  • 0.01987
  • 0.00081
  • 0.01353
  • 0.0005935
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0.002829
  • 0.01888
  • 0.0006269
  • -0.03057
Depletion potential of the stratospheric ozone layer (ODP)
  • 0.00001001
  • 0.000001021
  • 3.496E-8
  • 4.392E-7
  • 1.953E-8
  • 0
  • 0
  • 1.571E-7
  • 1.554E-7
  • 2.32E-8
  • -0.161
Water (user) deprivation potential (WDP)
  • 1.764E+4
  • 52.75
  • 3.336
  • 1506
  • 66.97
  • 0
  • 0
  • 9.913
  • 27.51
  • 7.664
  • -261.4

IndicatorUnit Production
A1-A3
Transport
A4
Installation
A5
Maintenance
B2
Repair
B3
Replacement
B4
De-construction
C1
Transport
C2
Waste processing
C3
Disposal
C4
Recycling Potential
D
1This impact category deals mainly with the eventual impact of low dose ionizing radiation on human health of the nuclear fuel cycle. It does not consider effects due to possible nuclear accidents, occupational exposure nor due to radioactive waste disposal in underground facilities. Potential ionizing radiation from the soil, from radon and from some construction materials is also not measured by this indicator.
2The results of this environmental impact indicator shall be used with care as the uncertainties on these results are high or as there is limited experiences with the indicator.
Potential Human exposure efficiency relative to U235 (IRP) 1
  • 4.335
  • 0.3005
  • 0.009981
  • 0.8896
  • 0.04033
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0.04542
  • 0.02412
  • 0.007387
  • -0.1929
Potential incidence of disease due to PM emissions (PM) 2
  • 0.000008874
  • 3.891E-7
  • 1.167E-8
  • 1.141E-7
  • 4.749E-9
  • 0
  • 0
  • 4.961E-8
  • 1.002E-7
  • 9.526E-9
  • -0.000001315
Potential Soil quality index (SQP) 2
  • 3293
  • 78.87
  • 1.744
  • 25.32
  • 1.131
  • 0
  • 0
  • 7.164
  • 1.926
  • 4.087
  • -212.9
Potential Comparative Toxic Unit for humans - non-cancer effects (HTP-nc) 2
  • 0.000002498
  • 4.864E-8
  • 3.758E-9
  • 8.809E-8
  • 3.369E-9
  • 0
  • 0
  • 8.269E-9
  • 8.171E-8
  • 2.118E-9
  • 9.888E-8
Potential Comparative Toxic Unit for humans - cancer effects (HTP-c) 2
  • 5.597E-7
  • 0
  • 9E-11
  • 2.793E-9
  • 9.7E-11
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 2.611E-9
  • 6.4E-11
  • -1.545E-8
Potential Comparative Toxic Unit for ecosystems (ETP-fw) 2
  • 4689
  • 50.29
  • 3.033
  • 86.63
  • 3.84
  • 0
  • 0
  • 7.654
  • 51.13
  • 1.544
  • -316.4