Close Go back Collapse all sections
Process Data set: EPD for aluminium crossbars – Lengths >6,6m (en) en

Key Data Set Information
Location NO
Geographical representativeness description Main market Norway/Nordics, but can be sold to and used anywhere in the world.
Reference year 2024
Name
EPD for aluminium crossbars – Lengths >6,6m
Use advice for data set The scope of the study is cradle to gate with options, with life cycle modules of A1-A3, A4, C1-C4 and D. B1 - B7 are excluded. The study takes into consideration the life cycle stages from the extraction of raw materials, production, processing and disposal, including all associated transport stages. The flowchart further illustrates the different stages of the product's life cycle considered. Module D includes the loads of melting and casting used aluminium potential benefits for the use of secondary aluminium outside the system boundary for the next product life cycle.
Technical purpose of product or process EL-tjeneste aluminium crossbars are strong and lightweight products designed for use in power transmission and distribution grids in harsh weather climates. The aluminium crossbars come as a part of a modular system with various types of attachments and can be mounted on all types of poles; wood, composite, aluminium and steel. The low weight compared to strength gives opportunities for the product to be mounted in ways that have a low impact on surrounding environments. The products have a high expected lifetime and are fully recyclable at the end of life. EL-tjeneste aluminium crossbars are extruded profiles in aluminium alloy 6000-series and comes in a variety of sizes and shapes depending on function and direction of load. Length of the crossbar and distance between pole and line attachment depends on the voltage level of the power grid. All crossbars made by EL-tjeneste are anodized with a dark brown color, this gives a higher corrosion resistance and make them less visible in surrounding environment. The color is UV resistant and reduces light reflection. The results in the current EPD are given for an average of the different aluminium profiles. In order to calculate the environmental footprint of a specific crossbar, the values in this EPD must be multiplied with the weight/length ratio and total length given in each product's datasheet. This EPD covers crossbars with a total length above 6600mm that are made from aluminium profile nr. 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 8 and 9.
Classification
Class name : Hierarchy level
  • EPDNorge: Construction / Steel and Aluminium
General comment on data set Data quality: Specific data for the product composition are provided by the manufacturer. The data represent the production of the declared product and were collected for EPD development in the year of study. Background data is based on EPDs according to EN 15804 and different LCA databases. The data quality of the raw materials in A1 is presented in the table below. Allocation: The allocation is made in accordance with the provisions of EN 15804. Incoming energy and water and waste production in-house is allocated equally among all products through mass allocation. Effects of primary production of recycled materials is allocated to the main product in which the material was used. The recycling process and transportation of the material is allocated to this analysis. Cut-off criteria: All major raw materials and all the essential energy is included. The production processes for raw materials and energy flows with very small amounts (less than 1%) are not included. These cut-off criteria do not apply for hazardous materials and substances.
Copyright Yes
Owner of data set
Quantitative reference
Reference flow(s)
Biogenic carbon content
  • Carbon content (biogenic): 1.0 kg
  • Carbon content (biogenic) - packaging: 1.0 kg
Time representativeness
Data set valid until 2029
Time representativeness description "2024-03-14" - "2029-03-14"
Technological representativeness
Technology description including background system For more technical details , please refer to the table provided and https://www.el-tjeneste.no/

Indicators of life cycle

IndicatorDirectionUnit Production
A1-A3
Transport
A4
Installation
A5
De-construction
C1
Transport
C2
Waste processing
C3
Disposal
C4
Recycling Potential
D
Input
  • 70.96
  • 0.01061
  • 0
  • 0.00009816
  • 0.01061
  • 0
  • 0.002316
  • -38.85
Input
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
Input
  • 70.96
  • 0.01061
  • 0
  • 0.00009816
  • 0.01061
  • 0
  • 0.002316
  • -38.85
Input
  • 125
  • 0.741
  • 0
  • 0.01815
  • 0.741
  • 0
  • 0.01656
  • -107.3
Input
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
Input
  • 125.3
  • 0.741
  • 0
  • 0.01815
  • 0.741
  • 0
  • 0.01656
  • -107.3
Input
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0.000008912
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
Input
  • 0.2439
  • 0.0003795
  • 0
  • 0.000002415
  • 0.0003795
  • 0
  • 0.00004802
  • -0.01586
Input
  • 0.267
  • 0.001357
  • 0
  • 0.00003554
  • 0.001357
  • 0
  • 0.00002239
  • 0.05715
Input
  • 0.5953
  • 0.00007924
  • 0
  • 9.34E-7
  • 0.00007924
  • 0
  • 0.00002172
  • -0.2121
Output
  • 0.03463
  • 0.00003821
  • 0
  • 5.342E-7
  • 0.00003821
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0.03556
Output
  • 3.208
  • 0.03603
  • 0
  • 0.00002149
  • 0.03603
  • 0
  • 0.05
  • -2.451
Output
  • 0.001001
  • 0.000005047
  • 0
  • 1.26E-7
  • 0.000005047
  • 0
  • 0
  • -0.0004385
Output
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
Output
  • 0.0549
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0.000008751
  • 0
  • 0.95
  • 0
  • 0
Output
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 2.713E-8
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
Output
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 9.302E-8
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
Output
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0.000001407
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0

IndicatorUnit Production
A1-A3
Transport
A4
Installation
A5
De-construction
C1
Transport
C2
Waste processing
C3
Disposal
C4
Recycling Potential
D
Abiotic depletion potential - fossil resources (ADPF)
  • 124.9
  • 0.7409
  • 0
  • 0.01815
  • 0.7409
  • 0
  • 0.01656
  • -107.3
Abiotic depletion potential - non-fossil resources (ADPE)
  • 0.00007205
  • 0.000001354
  • 0
  • 2.023E-9
  • 0.000001354
  • 0
  • 5.464E-9
  • 0.00001296
Acidification potential, Accumulated Exceedance (AP)
  • 0.04307
  • 0.0001408
  • 0
  • 0.00001379
  • 0.0001408
  • 0
  • 0.000005574
  • -0.05713
Global Warming Potential - biogenic (GWP-biogenic)
  • 0.03951
  • 0.00002028
  • 0
  • 2.472E-7
  • 0.00002028
  • 0
  • 0.000002293
  • -0.03877
Global Warming Potential - fossil fuels (GWP-fossil)
  • 6.926
  • 0.049
  • 0
  • 0.001319
  • 0.049
  • 0
  • 0.0007181
  • -8.434
Global Warming Potential - total (GWP-total)
  • 6.989
  • 0.04904
  • 0
  • 0.001319
  • 0.04904
  • 0
  • 0.0007207
  • -8.633
Global Warming Potential - land use and land use change (GWP-luluc)
  • 0.0226
  • 0.00001744
  • 0
  • 1.039E-7
  • 0.00001744
  • 0
  • 2.794E-7
  • -0.1603
  • 6.983
  • 0.04904
  • 0
  • 0.001319
  • 0.04904
  • 0
  • 0.0007207
  • -8.239
Eutrophication potential - freshwater (EP-freshwater)
  • 0.0001108
  • 3.915E-7
  • 0
  • 4.8E-9
  • 3.915E-7
  • 0
  • 1.302E-8
  • -0.0003262
Eutrophication potential - marine (EP-marine)
  • 0.00567
  • 0.00002787
  • 0
  • 0.000006088
  • 0.00002787
  • 0
  • 0.000001997
  • -0.007208
Eutrophication potential - terrestrial (EP-terrestrial)
  • 0.06522
  • 0.0003117
  • 0
  • 0.0000668
  • 0.0003117
  • 0
  • 0.00002249
  • -0.07932
Photochemical Ozone Creation Potential (POCP)
  • 0.0233
  • 0.0001194
  • 0
  • 0.00001837
  • 0.0001194
  • 0
  • 0.000006363
  • -0.02675
Depletion potential of the stratospheric ozone layer (ODP)
  • 0.000001149
  • 1.11E-8
  • 0
  • 2.85E-10
  • 1.11E-8
  • 0
  • 2.01E-10
  • -7.12E-7
Water (user) deprivation potential (WDP)
  • 3796
  • 0.7166
  • 0
  • 0.003856
  • 0.7166
  • 0
  • 0.4291
  • -4835

IndicatorUnit Production
A1-A3
Transport
A4
Installation
A5
De-construction
C1
Transport
C2
Waste processing
C3
Disposal
C4
Recycling Potential
D
1This impact category deals mainly with the eventual impact of low dose ionizing radiation on human health of the nuclear fuel cycle. It does not consider effects due to possible nuclear accidents, occupational exposure nor due to radioactive waste disposal in underground facilities. Potential ionizing radiation from the soil, from radon and from some construction materials is also not measured by this indicator.
2The results of this environmental impact indicator shall be used with care as the uncertainties on these results are high or as there is limited experiences with the indicator.
Potential Human exposure efficiency relative to U235 (IRP) 1
  • 1.561
  • 0.003238
  • 0
  • 0.00007777
  • 0.003238
  • 0
  • 0.000111
  • -0.4667
Potential incidence of disease due to PM emissions (PM) 2
  • 5.461E-7
  • 3E-9
  • 0
  • 3.65E-10
  • 3E-9
  • 0
  • 9.6E-11
  • -5.893E-7
Potential Soil quality index (SQP) 2
  • 60.74
  • 0.5183
  • 0
  • 0.002303
  • 0.5183
  • 0
  • 0.04658
  • -0.9166
Potential Comparative Toxic Unit for humans - non-cancer effects (HTP-nc) 2
  • 3.213E-7
  • 6E-10
  • 0
  • 9E-12
  • 6E-10
  • 0
  • 2.5E-11
  • -2.488E-7
Potential Comparative Toxic Unit for humans - cancer effects (HTP-c) 2
  • 2.776E-8
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 1E-12
  • -2.136E-8
Potential Comparative Toxic Unit for ecosystems (ETP-fw) 2
  • 326.1
  • 0.5492
  • 0
  • 0.009918
  • 0.5492
  • 0
  • 30.95
  • -127.4