Close Go back Collapse all sections
Process Data set: Load bearing PE-HD components for aquaculture farms (en) en

Key Data Set Information
Location NO
Geographical representativeness description Mainly Norway.
Reference year 2025
Name
Load bearing PE-HD components for aquaculture farms
Technical purpose of product or process Load bearing PE-HD components for aquaculture farms have a grey outer layer of virgin PE-HD and an inner layer consisting of virgin and recycled PE-HD. This EPD is based on an inner layer of 50 % recycled PE-HD. The outer layer is 10 % of the weight of the product. For project specific EPD other ratios of recycled and virgin PE-HD can be given. For more information: www.hallingplast.no The product standard for these pipes is NS-EN 12201.
General comment on data set Data quality: Specific data for the product composition are provided by the manufacturer. The data represent the production of the declared product and were collected for EPD development in the year of study. Background data is based on EPDs according to EN 15804 and different LCA databases. The data quality of the raw materials in A1 is presented in the table below. Allocation: The allocation is made in accordance with the provisions of EN 15804. Incoming energy and water and waste production in-house is allocated equally among all products through mass allocation. Effects of primary production of recycled materials is allocated to the main product in which the material was used. The recycling process and transportation of the material is allocated to this analysis. Cut-off criteria: All major raw materials and all the essential energy is included. The production processes for raw materials and energy flows with very small amounts (less than 1%) are not included. These cut-off criteria do not apply for hazardous materials and substances.
Copyright Yes
Owner of data set
Quantitative reference
Reference flow(s)
Biogenic carbon content
  • Carbon content (biogenic): 1.0 kg
  • Carbon content (biogenic) - packaging: 1.0 kg
Time representativeness
Data set valid until 2030
Technological representativeness
Technology description including background system The dimensions given for these products, i.e. diameter and wall thickness, are mean values based on the dimensions given in the product standard. For additional technical information: www.hallingplast.no

Indicators of life cycle

IndicatorDirectionUnit Production
A1-A3
 Transport
A4
 De-construction
C1
 Transport
C2
 Waste processing
C3
 Disposal
C4
 Recycling Potential
D
Input
  • 3.668
  • 0.02051
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0.4988
  • 0.0000522
  • -1.879
Input
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
Input
  • 3.668
  • 0.02051
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0.4988
  • 0.0000522
  • -1.879
Input
  • 20.85
  • 1.433
  • 0
  • 0
  • 1.526
  • 0.0008667
  • -29.96
Input
  • 43.52
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • -23.26
  • 0
  • -40.35
Input
  • 64.37
  • 1.433
  • 0
  • 0
  • -21.73
  • 0.0008667
  • -70.3
Input
  • 0.4614
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • -0.004156
Input
  • 0.04559
  • 0.0007336
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0.001211
  • 0.000001297
  • -0.06727
Input
  • 0.01819
  • 0.002623
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0.0001793
  • -0.05306
Input
  • 0.04889
  • 0.0001532
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0.004626
  • 7.971E-7
  • -0.02394
Output
  • 0.003772
  • 0.00007388
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0.0002459
  • 0.001491
  • -0.001298
Output
  • 0.1518
  • 0.06966
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0.01047
  • 0.00082
  • -0.06327
Output
  • 0.00004488
  • 0.000009758
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0.000003824
  • 5.222E-9
  • -0.00004063
Output
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
Output
  • 0.00305
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0.95
  • 0
  • -0.0006659
Output
  • 0.01021
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0.05
  • 0
  • -0.002506
Output
  • 0.006533
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0.09696
  • 0
  • -0.003681
Output
  • 0.09883
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 1.467
  • 0
  • -0.05569

IndicatorUnit Production
A1-A3
 Transport
A4
 De-construction
C1
 Transport
C2
 Waste processing
C3
 Disposal
C4
 Recycling Potential
D
Abiotic depletion potential - fossil resources (ADPF)
  • 43.06
  • 1.432
  • 0
  • 0
  • 1.526
  • 0.0008666
  • -67.38
Abiotic depletion potential - non-fossil resources (ADPE)
  • 0.00001388
  • 0.000002617
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0.000004689
  • 5.28E-10
  • -0.00001713
Acidification potential, Accumulated Exceedance (AP)
  • 0.00648
  • 0.0002723
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0.0006376
  • 3.385E-7
  • -0.006908
Global Warming Potential - biogenic (GWP-biogenic)
  • 0.009278
  • 0.00003921
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0.0002781
  • 5.162E-8
  • -0.009934
Global Warming Potential - fossil fuels (GWP-fossil)
  • 1.353
  • 0.09474
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0.2351
  • 0.00009809
  • -1.912
Global Warming Potential - total (GWP-total)
  • 1.362
  • 0.09481
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0.2354
  • 0.00009816
  • -1.923
Global Warming Potential - land use and land use change (GWP-luluc)
  • 0.0005115
  • 0.00003372
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0.00005309
  • 1.477E-8
  • -0.0008755
  • 1.297
  • 0.09481
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0.2354
  • 0.0001019
  • -1.815
Eutrophication potential - freshwater (EP-freshwater)
  • 0.00002491
  • 7.569E-7
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0.000002238
  • 1.332E-9
  • -0.00003306
Eutrophication potential - marine (EP-marine)
  • 0.001389
  • 0.00005387
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0.0001567
  • 1.052E-7
  • -0.001193
Eutrophication potential - terrestrial (EP-terrestrial)
  • 0.01542
  • 0.0006026
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0.001857
  • 0.000001198
  • -0.01329
Photochemical Ozone Creation Potential (POCP)
  • 0.005907
  • 0.0002308
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0.0005444
  • 3.3E-7
  • -0.006424
Depletion potential of the stratospheric ozone layer (ODP)
  • 7.172E-8
  • 2.146E-8
  • 0
  • 0
  • 1.135E-8
  • 1E-11
  • -0.0006196
Water (user) deprivation potential (WDP)
  • 46.45
  • 1.386
  • 0
  • 0
  • 7.074
  • 0.009337
  • -72.57

IndicatorUnit Production
A1-A3
 Transport
A4
 De-construction
C1
 Transport
C2
 Waste processing
C3
 Disposal
C4
 Recycling Potential
D
1This impact category deals mainly with the eventual impact of low dose ionizing radiation on human health of the nuclear fuel cycle. It does not consider effects due to possible nuclear accidents, occupational exposure nor due to radioactive waste disposal in underground facilities. Potential ionizing radiation from the soil, from radon and from some construction materials is also not measured by this indicator.
2The results of this environmental impact indicator shall be used with care as the uncertainties on these results are high or as there is limited experiences with the indicator.
Potential Human exposure efficiency relative to U235 (IRP) 1
  • 0.04357
  • 0.006261
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0.003415
  • 0.000004144
  • -0.04562
Potential incidence of disease due to PM emissions (PM) 2
  • 6.327E-8
  • 5.8E-9
  • 0
  • 0
  • 9.094E-9
  • 4E-12
  • -6.085E-8
Potential Soil quality index (SQP) 2
  • 2.942
  • 1.002
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0.2501
  • 0.002377
  • -2.941
Potential Comparative Toxic Unit for humans - non-cancer effects (HTP-nc) 2
  • 1.041E-8
  • 1.16E-9
  • 0
  • 0
  • 1.265E-9
  • 3E-12
  • -1.227E-8
Potential Comparative Toxic Unit for humans - cancer effects (HTP-c) 2
  • 4.24E-10
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 1.03E-10
  • 0
  • -5.26E-10
Potential Comparative Toxic Unit for ecosystems (ETP-fw) 2
  • 9.304
  • 1.062
  • 0
  • 0
  • 1.643
  • 0.001646
  • -11.14