Close Go back Collapse all sections
Process Data set: Sinker tube for 157m fish farming pens (pipe ø400mm) (en) en

Key Data Set Information
Location NO
Geographical representativeness description Norway
Reference year 2024
Name
Sinker tube for 157m fish farming pens (pipe ø400mm)
Technical purpose of product or process Sinker tube for 157m pens (Pipe ø400mm) As one of few suppliers of equipment to the fish farming industry, ScaleAQ is an approved supplier of pens, nets and mooring equipment. Both at home as well as abroad, we exclusively employ certified plastic welders with considerable experience of cage assembly. Our certificates are approved in accordance with the requirements of NS 9415. The sinker tube is optional in accordance with the floating collar. Scale AQs floating collars and sinker tubes combines the flexibility and durability of high density polyethylene plastic pipes with strong steel brackets. A sinker tube helps prevent the shape and thus the net volume from changing in locations subject to storms. The sinker tube is designed to make the handling of the net easier. All ScaleAQ pens are certified for use with a sinker tube. Benefits using sinker tube: Safety: - Reduces point load on nets. - Gives you full control during lining up. - Minimal risk of propeller damage to nets. - Stable net volume, even under extreme conditions. Environmental benefits: - Open mesh ensures good through-flow and less marine growth. - “Constant” cylindrical net volume means fewer injuries and stress for the fish. - A sinker tube makes delousing using sealed tarpaulins easier in large net pens. Easier cleaning: - Easy washing using brushes/high-pressure washes or divers. - Net drying without significant changes to net shape.
Classification
Class name : Hierarchy level
  • EPDNorge: Sea-based aquaculture infrastructure and components
General comment on data set Data quality: Specific data for the product composition are provided by the manufacturer. The data represent the production of the declared product and were collected for EPD development in the year of study. Background data is based on EPDs according to EN 15804 and different LCA databases. The data quality of the raw materials in A1 is presented in the table below. Allocation: The allocation is made in accordance with the provisions of EN 15804. Incoming energy and water and waste production in-house is allocated equally among all products through mass allocation. Effects of primary production of recycled materials is allocated to the main product in which the material was used. The recycling process and transportation of the material is allocated to this analysis. Cut-off criteria: All major raw materials and all the essential energy is included. The production processes for raw materials and energy flows with very small amounts (less than 1%) are not included. These cut-off criteria do not apply for hazardous materials and substances.
Copyright Yes
Owner of data set
Quantitative reference
Reference flow(s)
Biogenic carbon content
  • Carbon content (biogenic): 0.0 kg
  • Carbon content (biogenic) - packaging: 0.0 kg
Time representativeness
Data set valid until 2029
Time representativeness description "2024-02-01" - "2029-02-01"
Technological representativeness
Technology description including background system HDPE100 ø400mm SDR11 Brackets: Galvanized steel brackets, total 20pcs. Steel wire: reused steel Total weight of sinker tube : 20 821 kg

Indicators of life cycle

IndicatorDirectionUnit Raw material supply
A1
Transport
A2
Manufacturing
A3
Transport
A4
De-construction
C1
Transport
C2
Waste processing
C3
Disposal
C4
Recycling Potential
D
Input
  • 2.382E+4
  • 206.5
  • 221.6
  • 1598
  • 33.16
  • 220.8
  • 1.038E+4
  • 3.084
  • -2.208E+4
Input
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
Input
  • 2.382E+4
  • 206.5
  • 221.6
  • 1598
  • 33.16
  • 220.8
  • 1.038E+4
  • 3.084
  • -2.208E+4
Input
  • 2.856E+5
  • 2.346E+4
  • 2449
  • 3.638E+5
  • 6202
  • 1.543E+4
  • 3.164E+4
  • 182.6
  • -3.2E+5
Input
  • 2.992E+5
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • -2.992E+5
  • 0
  • -2.843E+5
Input
  • 5.849E+5
  • 2.346E+4
  • 2449
  • 3.638E+5
  • 6202
  • 1.543E+4
  • -2.676E+5
  • 182.6
  • -6.042E+5
Input
  • 635.2
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • -29.28
Input
  • 1008
  • 7.667
  • 0.4876
  • 0
  • 0.3237
  • 7.901
  • 25.09
  • 0.06527
  • -6.594
Input
  • -1392
  • 31.08
  • 5.171
  • 0
  • 4.763
  • 28.25
  • 0
  • 1.425
  • 1.323E+4
Input
  • 292.1
  • 1.437
  • 1.683
  • 14.56
  • 0.3066
  • 1.65
  • 95.94
  • 0.2159
  • -195.9
Output
  • 40.38
  • 0.9166
  • 0.08679
  • 10.55
  • 0.1973
  • 0.7956
  • 5.119
  • 10.51
  • -76.42
Output
  • 1726
  • 542
  • 4.136
  • 475.2
  • 9.323
  • 750.2
  • 218.1
  • 1283
  • -5736
Output
  • 0.6619
  • 0.1635
  • 0.01704
  • 2.578
  • 0.04344
  • 0.1051
  • 0.07963
  • 0.00003679
  • -0.2506
Output
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
Output
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0.8183
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 1.909E+4
  • 0
  • -4.692
Output
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0.000002008
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 352.3
  • 0
  • -17.66
Output
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0.2794
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 683.2
  • 0
  • -25.94
Output
  • 0
  • 0
  • 4.226
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 1.034E+4
  • 0
  • -392.4

IndicatorUnit Raw material supply
A1
Transport
A2
Manufacturing
A3
Transport
A4
De-construction
C1
Transport
C2
Waste processing
C3
Disposal
C4
Recycling Potential
D
Abiotic depletion potential - fossil resources (ADPF)
  • 5.847E+5
  • 2.345E+4
  • 2449
  • 3.638E+5
  • 6202
  • 1.543E+4
  • 3.164E+4
  • 182.6
  • -5.837E+5
Abiotic depletion potential - non-fossil resources (ADPE)
  • 5.128
  • 0.02259
  • 0.0003595
  • 0.1102
  • 0.001858
  • 0.02818
  • 0.09756
  • 0.00005213
  • -0.344
Acidification potential, Accumulated Exceedance (AP)
  • 84.5
  • 32.31
  • 1.858
  • 920.6
  • 11.32
  • 2.932
  • 13.01
  • 0.05577
  • -113
Global Warming Potential - biogenic (GWP-biogenic)
  • 185.4
  • 0.4649
  • 0.06574
  • 5.011
  • 0.09528
  • 0.4223
  • 5.774
  • 0.005016
  • -77.13
Global Warming Potential - fossil fuels (GWP-fossil)
  • 2.033E+4
  • 1697
  • 178.4
  • 2.668E+4
  • 453.8
  • 1.02E+3
  • 2816
  • 6.161
  • -2.641E+4
Global Warming Potential - total (GWP-total)
  • 2.052E+4
  • 1697
  • 178.4
  • 2.669E+4
  • 454
  • 1021
  • 2823
  • 6.168
  • -2.65E+4
Global Warming Potential - land use and land use change (GWP-luluc)
  • 12.55
  • 0.5018
  • 0.0188
  • 9.666
  • 0.156
  • 0.3631
  • 1.103
  • 0.001177
  • -11.97
  • 2.051E+4
  • 1697
  • 178
  • 2.669E+4
  • 454
  • 1021
  • 2823
  • 6.194
  • -3.217E+4
Eutrophication potential - freshwater (EP-freshwater)
  • 0.6438
  • 0.00795
  • 0.0007284
  • 0.07036
  • 0.001543
  • 0.008151
  • 0.04643
  • 0.00005021
  • -1.029
Eutrophication potential - marine (EP-marine)
  • 14.7
  • 7.372
  • 0.8171
  • 222.2
  • 3.1
  • 0.5802
  • 3.138
  • 0.02076
  • -21.72
Eutrophication potential - terrestrial (EP-terrestrial)
  • 163.7
  • 82.21
  • 8.967
  • 2434
  • 33.97
  • 6.49
  • 37.31
  • 0.229
  • -229.7
Photochemical Ozone Creation Potential (POCP)
  • 68.8
  • 21.75
  • 2.465
  • 637.8
  • 9.044
  • 2.486
  • 11.01
  • 0.06543
  • -110.1
Depletion potential of the stratospheric ozone layer (ODP)
  • 0.0007996
  • 0.0003729
  • 0.00003825
  • 0.005823
  • 0.00009811
  • 0.0002311
  • 0.0002348
  • 0.000002735
  • -4.366
Water (user) deprivation potential (WDP)
  • 1.032E+6
  • 1.305E+4
  • 3323
  • 6.128E+4
  • 1196
  • 1.492E+4
  • 1.47E+5
  • 437.4
  • 1.598E+5

IndicatorUnit Raw material supply
A1
Transport
A2
Manufacturing
A3
Transport
A4
De-construction
C1
Transport
C2
Waste processing
C3
Disposal
C4
Recycling Potential
D
1This impact category deals mainly with the eventual impact of low dose ionizing radiation on human health of the nuclear fuel cycle. It does not consider effects due to possible nuclear accidents, occupational exposure nor due to radioactive waste disposal in underground facilities. Potential ionizing radiation from the soil, from radon and from some construction materials is also not measured by this indicator.
2The results of this environmental impact indicator shall be used with care as the uncertainties on these results are high or as there is limited experiences with the indicator.
Potential Human exposure efficiency relative to U235 (IRP) 1
  • 756.8
  • 102.3
  • 10.72
  • 1.58E+3
  • 26.74
  • 67.43
  • 70.86
  • 0.7954
  • -275
Potential incidence of disease due to PM emissions (PM) 2
  • 0.0007821
  • 0.00006933
  • 0.00004897
  • 0.00637
  • 0.0001147
  • 0.00006246
  • 0.0001883
  • 0.000001166
  • -0.001503
Potential Soil quality index (SQP) 2
  • 7.877E+4
  • 9176
  • 317
  • 4.679E+4
  • 804.1
  • 1.079E+4
  • 5.19E+3
  • 660.2
  • -2.887E+4
Potential Comparative Toxic Unit for humans - non-cancer effects (HTP-nc) 2
  • 0.0003958
  • 0.000008806
  • 0.000001305
  • 0.000162
  • 0.000003076
  • 0.00001249
  • 0.00002461
  • 7.265E-8
  • 0.001267
Potential Comparative Toxic Unit for humans - cancer effects (HTP-c) 2
  • 0.00002649
  • 0
  • 5.513E-8
  • 0.00002314
  • 2.906E-7
  • 0
  • 0.000002106
  • 3.139E-9
  • -0.00006596
Potential Comparative Toxic Unit for ecosystems (ETP-fw) 2
  • 3.37E+5
  • 1.431E+4
  • 1404
  • 1.909E+5
  • 3404
  • 1.144E+4
  • 3.38E+4
  • 98.91
  • -8E+5