Close Go back Collapse all sections
Process Data set: NorDan Kvillsfors Fixed frame with sec. sash - KE (With Aluminium Cladding) (en) en

Key Data Set Information
Location SE
Geographical representativeness description Europe, but scenarios beyond cradle-to-gate are based on the situation in the Norwegian market.
Reference year 2024
Name
NorDan Kvillsfors Fixed frame with sec. sash - KE (With Aluminium Cladding)
Technical purpose of product or process NorDan Kwillsfors fixed frame window for use in exterior walls of domestic and commercial buildings. Product NorDan Kvillsfors Fixed frame with a sidehung secondary sash - KE in size 1230x1480 mm is covered in this EPD. Wooden window with aluminium cladding. 3+1 glazed unit 4+16G+4+16G+E4 and 4mm float glass
Classification
Class name : Hierarchy level
  • EPDNorge: Construction / Doors and windows
General comment on data set Data quality: Specific data for the product composition are provided by the manufacturer. The data represent the production of the declared product and were collected for EPD development in the year of study. Background data is based on EPDs according to EN 15804 and different LCA databases. The data quality of the raw materials in A1 is presented in the table below. Material quantities of the specified product in reference size have been calculated by NorDan's business system. The production data was collected in 2021 and is an average for 2020. Allocation: The allocation is made in accordance with the provisions of EN 15804. Effects of primary production of recycled materials is allocated to the main product in which the material was used. The recycling process and transportation of the material is allocated to this analysis. The PCR specific background data follow the allocation rules in the Ecoinvent v3.7.1 Cut-off database version. The allocation of water, energy and waste flows within the production facilities for windows and doors follows unit-based allocation adjusted with a point system to different product groups or products. This score system is regulated by a factor which increases with the resource intensity of each product. The unit-based allocation is adjusted by the weight of the product, excluding the weight of glass. Cut-off criteria: All major raw materials and all the essential energy is included. The production processes for raw materials and energy flows with very small amounts (less than 1%) are not included. These cut-off criteria do not apply for hazardous materials and substances.
Copyright Yes
Owner of data set
Quantitative reference
Reference flow(s)
Biogenic carbon content
  • Carbon content (biogenic): 7.908211187264 kg
  • Carbon content (biogenic) - packaging: 1.48416583453 kg
Time representativeness
Data set valid until 2029
Time representativeness description "2024-02-06" - "2029-02-06"
Technological representativeness
Technology description including background system Fixed frame window with secondary sash. 3+1 glazed, 115 mm frame with aluminium caldding. U-value 0,73 W/m2K. The total weight of the product is 82,46 kg. Area of functional unit 1,82m2. Conversion factor is 0,549 for 1m2 The packaging has a average weight of 3,77 kg.

Indicators of life cycle

IndicatorDirectionUnit Production
A1-A3
Transport
A4
Installation
A5
Maintenance
B2
Replacement
B4
De-construction
C1
Transport
C2
Waste processing
C3
Disposal
C4
Recycling Potential
D
Input
  • 522.4
  • 0.7673
  • 0.002389
  • 45.84
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0.125
  • 1.341
  • 0.3002
  • -171.6
Input
  • 293.8
  • 0
  • -49.83
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • -244
  • 0
  • 0
Input
  • 816.2
  • 0.7673
  • -49.83
  • 45.84
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0.125
  • -242.6
  • 0.3
  • -171.6
Input
  • 1587
  • 61
  • 0.1099
  • 706.1
  • 0
  • 0
  • 8.711
  • 11.54
  • 16.38
  • -67.85
Input
  • 111.4
  • 0
  • -5.521
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • -106.2
  • 0
  • 0
Input
  • 1698
  • 61
  • -5.411
  • 706.1
  • 0
  • 0
  • 8.711
  • -94.68
  • 16.38
  • -67.85
Input
  • 0.3415
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0.01146
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
Input
  • 0.6537
  • 0.02684
  • 0.00006754
  • 0.04363
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0.004448
  • 0.02785
  • 0.007965
  • -0.0021
Input
  • 1.209
  • 0.08995
  • 0.0004803
  • 0.1126
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0.01562
  • 0
  • 0.2911
  • -8.468
Input
  • 2.904
  • 0.006941
  • 0.0000649
  • 0.71
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0.0009857
  • 0.01904
  • 0.01476
  • -0.2617
Output
  • 1.412
  • 0.003337
  • 0
  • 52.84
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0.0004697
  • 0
  • 64.28
  • 0.005983
Output
  • 28.66
  • 5.302
  • 0.3595
  • 8.459
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0.5399
  • 60.14
  • 0.5321
  • -1.755
Output
  • 0.008005
  • 0.0004165
  • 0
  • 0.002681
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0.00005924
  • 0
  • 0.0001009
  • -0.0002751
Output
  • 0
  • 0
  • 3.41
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
Output
  • 1.497
  • 0
  • 0.1164
  • 0.2724
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0.595
  • 0
  • 0
Output
  • 1.092
  • 0
  • 0.1781
  • 0.000102
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 83.52
  • 0
  • 0
Output
  • 0.573
  • 0
  • 0.1239
  • 3.958
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 16.5
  • 0
  • 0
Output
  • 8.404
  • 0
  • 1.874
  • 58.48
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 249.7
  • 0
  • 0

IndicatorUnit Production
A1-A3
Transport
A4
Installation
A5
Maintenance
B2
Replacement
B4
De-construction
C1
Transport
C2
Waste processing
C3
Disposal
C4
Recycling Potential
D
Abiotic depletion potential - fossil resources (ADPF)
  • 1703
  • 61
  • 0.1099
  • 773.5
  • 0
  • 0
  • 8.71
  • 11.54
  • 16.38
  • -67.86
Abiotic depletion potential - non-fossil resources (ADPE)
  • 0.001537
  • 0.00006691
  • 1.523E-7
  • 0.0008143
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0.00001469
  • 0.000005037
  • 0.00001238
  • -0.00002831
Acidification potential, Accumulated Exceedance (AP)
  • 1.126
  • 0.01209
  • 0.00005442
  • 0.5687
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0.003233
  • 0.01038
  • 0.005054
  • -0.03767
Global Warming Potential - biogenic (GWP-biogenic)
  • -27.49
  • 0.001609
  • 5.441
  • 0.4938
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0.0002435
  • 23.38
  • 0.0005341
  • -0.01684
Global Warming Potential - fossil fuels (GWP-fossil)
  • 125.8
  • 3.755
  • 0.01584
  • 65.59
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0.5674
  • 11.16
  • 0.7096
  • -5.401
Global Warming Potential - total (GWP-total)
  • 98.47
  • 3.758
  • 5.457
  • 66.34
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0.5678
  • 34.53
  • 0.7104
  • -5.532
Global Warming Potential - land use and land use change (GWP-luluc)
  • 0.1887
  • 0.001144
  • 0.000002276
  • 0.2543
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0.0002008
  • 0.0002743
  • 0.0002157
  • -0.1145
  • 135.6
  • 3.758
  • 0.01584
  • 66.2
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0.5678
  • 11.16
  • 0.7119
  • -5.8
Eutrophication potential - freshwater (EP-freshwater)
  • 0.003758
  • 0.00002988
  • 8.464E-8
  • 0.00154
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0.000004669
  • 0.00001544
  • 0.00000704
  • -0.0003183
Eutrophication potential - marine (EP-marine)
  • 0.1967
  • 0.002648
  • 0.00002914
  • 0.09588
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0.001157
  • 0.004805
  • 0.001803
  • -0.008059
Eutrophication potential - terrestrial (EP-terrestrial)
  • 2.278
  • 0.02953
  • 0.0002335
  • 1.126
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0.01275
  • 0.04839
  • 0.0199
  • -0.08707
Photochemical Ozone Creation Potential (POCP)
  • 0.6242
  • 0.0116
  • 0.00006375
  • 0.2928
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0.003644
  • 0.01245
  • 0.005745
  • -0.02741
Depletion potential of the stratospheric ozone layer (ODP)
  • 0.00001621
  • 9.054E-7
  • 1.551E-9
  • 0.00000761
  • 0
  • 0
  • 1.293E-7
  • 1.498E-7
  • 2.216E-7
  • -0.1305
Water (user) deprivation potential (WDP)
  • 1.149E+4
  • 46.77
  • 0.2476
  • 101.5
  • 0
  • 0
  • 8.256
  • 44.58
  • 31.57
  • -1855

IndicatorUnit Production
A1-A3
Transport
A4
Installation
A5
Maintenance
B2
Replacement
B4
De-construction
C1
Transport
C2
Waste processing
C3
Disposal
C4
Recycling Potential
D
1This impact category deals mainly with the eventual impact of low dose ionizing radiation on human health of the nuclear fuel cycle. It does not consider effects due to possible nuclear accidents, occupational exposure nor due to radioactive waste disposal in underground facilities. Potential ionizing radiation from the soil, from radon and from some construction materials is also not measured by this indicator.
2The results of this environmental impact indicator shall be used with care as the uncertainties on these results are high or as there is limited experiences with the indicator.
Potential Human exposure efficiency relative to U235 (IRP) 1
  • 9.247
  • 0.2666
  • 0.0004444
  • 2.188
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0.03807
  • 0.03805
  • 0.06575
  • -0.3131
Potential incidence of disease due to PM emissions (PM) 2
  • 0.00001332
  • 3.449E-7
  • 7.51E-10
  • 0.00000578
  • 0
  • 0
  • 5.174E-8
  • 1.792E-7
  • 9.269E-8
  • -0.000001158
Potential Soil quality index (SQP) 2
  • 5934
  • 69.92
  • 0.1133
  • 327.1
  • 0
  • 0
  • 7.455
  • 3.668
  • 35.43
  • -172.2
Potential Comparative Toxic Unit for humans - non-cancer effects (HTP-nc) 2
  • 0.000002726
  • 4.311E-8
  • 3.92E-10
  • 8.646E-7
  • 0
  • 0
  • 8.623E-9
  • 6.384E-8
  • 8.928E-9
  • -1.258E-7
Potential Comparative Toxic Unit for humans - cancer effects (HTP-c) 2
  • 2.367E-7
  • 0
  • 8E-12
  • 8.822E-8
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 4.91E-9
  • 3.38E-10
  • -1.364E-8
Potential Comparative Toxic Unit for ecosystems (ETP-fw) 2
  • 3845
  • 44.6
  • 0.113
  • 2208
  • 0
  • 0
  • 6.513
  • 58.69
  • 9.548
  • -228.5