Close Go back Collapse all sections
Process Data set: Nordia 3-seater w/ open armrest (en) en

Key Data Set Information
Location EE
Geographical representativeness description Europa and USA
Reference year 2025
Name
Nordia 3-seater w/ open armrest
Technical purpose of product or process Nordia is designed so that you can sit together, but still have the comfort of a separate seat. The interplay between the bend in the back and the soft shapes of the armrests gives the seating group an exciting design language. The turned legs are very robust, while at the same time giving the seating group an airy feel in the room. In Nordia, you can sit for a long time, with the ergonomically firm and molded seat cushion and the large and soft neck pillow. It is also very easy to keep clean, with a crumb gap between the seat, back and armrests. See variants on page 11 - Distance between seat and back - Distance between seat and armrests - Removable back covers - Wooden base - Removable seat cover with waterproof cover underneath - Removable back cover with waterproof cover underneath - Non-slip washable product cover - Extra seat height, up to 5 cm - Armrest cushion top - Chemical disinfectant ok (acid-cured varnish) - EPD (Environmental Product Declaration) - Møbelfakta
Classification
Class name : Hierarchy level
  • EPDNorge: Furniture / Soft seating
General comment on data set Data quality: Specific data for the product composition are provided by the manufacturer. They represent the production of the declared product and were collected for EPD development in the year of study. Background data is based on registered EPDs according to EN 15804, Ostfold Research databases, ecoinvent and other LCA databases. The data quality of the raw materials in A1 is presented in the table below. Allocation: The allocation is made in accordance with the provisions of EN 15804. Incoming energy and water and waste production in-house is allocated equally among all products through mass allocation. Effects of primary production of recycled materials is allocated to the main product in which the material was used. The recycling process and transportation of the material is allocated to this analysis. Cut-off criteria: All major raw materials and all the essential energy is included. The production processes for raw materials and energy flows with very small amounts (less than 1%) are not included. These cut-off criteria do not apply for hazardous materials and substances.
Copyright Yes
Owner of data set
Quantitative reference
Reference flow(s)
Biogenic carbon content
  • Carbon content (biogenic): 4.022727272723 kg
  • Carbon content (biogenic) - packaging: 3.1481481484 kg
Time representativeness
Data set valid until 2030
Time representativeness description 2025-06-24 - 2030-06-24
Technological representativeness
Technology description including background system Width: 193 cm, Height: 79 cm, Depth: 72 cm, Seat height 46 cm, Armrest height: 68 cm, The product is tested and approved according to the following standards: The testing laboratory has been accredited by the Latvian National Accreditation Bureau LATAK in accordance with the requirements of LVS EN ISO/IEC 17025:2017 and has been assigned registration No. T-316. NS-EN 16139: 2013 NS-EN 1022: 2005 NS-EN 1335-3: 2005 NS-EN 1728: 2012

Indicators of life cycle

IndicatorDirectionUnit Production
A1-A3
Transport
A4
Installation
A5
Maintenance
B2
Repair
B3
Replacement
B4
De-construction
C1
Transport
C2
Waste processing
C3
Disposal
C4
Recycling Potential
D
Input
  • 638.1
  • 2.082
  • 0.02533
  • 20.46
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0.1211
  • 0.2723
  • 0.05958
  • -140.5
Input
  • 163.6
  • 0
  • -39.78
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • -123.8
  • 0
  • 0
Input
  • 801.7
  • 2.082
  • -39.75
  • 20.46
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0.1211
  • -123.5
  • 0.05958
  • -140.5
Input
  • 1902
  • 138.2
  • 1.539
  • 107.1
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 8.458
  • 9.367
  • 2.729
  • -59.99
Input
  • 259.6
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • -259.6
  • 0
  • 0
Input
  • 2161
  • 138.2
  • 1.539
  • 107.1
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 8.458
  • -250.2
  • 2.729
  • -59.99
Input
  • 9.804
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
Input
  • 1.109
  • 0.0747
  • 0.0008403
  • 1.496
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0.004332
  • 0.006377
  • 0.001556
  • 0.1379
Input
  • 0.7135
  • 0.2684
  • 0.003464
  • 0.3927
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0.01549
  • 0
  • 0.1163
  • -3.431
Input
  • 1.902
  • 0.01525
  • 0.0007261
  • 0.8715
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0.0009045
  • 0.03137
  • 0.002463
  • -0.175
Output
  • 0.8694
  • 0.007272
  • 0
  • 0.01628
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0.0004362
  • 0
  • 10.15
  • -0.02436
Output
  • 28.04
  • 6.364
  • 6.8
  • 0.4023
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0.4113
  • 0
  • 0.2928
  • -2.36
Output
  • 0.006401
  • 0.0009386
  • 0
  • 0.0007587
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0.00005762
  • 0
  • 0.00001668
  • -0.0001041
Output
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
Output
  • 0.05307
  • 0
  • 6.325
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 5.096
  • 0
  • 0
Output
  • 0.602
  • 0
  • 0.000009258
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 32.67
  • 0
  • 0
Output
  • 0.3528
  • 0
  • 0.3889
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 17.83
  • 0
  • 0
Output
  • 5.338
  • 0
  • 5.884
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 269.7
  • 0
  • 0

IndicatorUnit Production
A1-A3
Transport
A4
Installation
A5
Maintenance
B2
Repair
B3
Replacement
B4
De-construction
C1
Transport
C2
Waste processing
C3
Disposal
C4
Recycling Potential
D
Abiotic depletion potential - fossil resources (ADPF)
  • 2157
  • 138.1
  • 1.539
  • 106.9
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 8.458
  • 9.342
  • 2.729
  • -60.01
Abiotic depletion potential - non-fossil resources (ADPE)
  • 0.003052
  • 0.0002752
  • 0.000002677
  • 0.00004386
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0.00001545
  • 0.000004299
  • 0.000002031
  • -0.00009289
Acidification potential, Accumulated Exceedance (AP)
  • 0.8022
  • 0.02635
  • 0.0005209
  • 0.03053
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0.001608
  • 0.01868
  • 0.0008607
  • -0.03512
Global Warming Potential - biogenic (GWP-biogenic)
  • -24.24
  • 0.003921
  • 11.54
  • 0.03657
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0.0002315
  • 17.04
  • 0.0001047
  • -0.005688
Global Warming Potential - fossil fuels (GWP-fossil)
  • 142.7
  • 9.169
  • 0.11
  • 5.229
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0.5594
  • 19.63
  • 0.134
  • -6.042
Global Warming Potential - total (GWP-total)
  • 119.6
  • 9.177
  • 11.65
  • 5.277
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0.5598
  • 36.67
  • 0.1342
  • -6.103
Global Warming Potential - land use and land use change (GWP-luluc)
  • 1.133
  • 0.003462
  • 0.00003638
  • 0.01198
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0.0001991
  • 0.0001455
  • 0.00003682
  • -0.05561
  • 148.7
  • 9.176
  • 0.11
  • 5.642
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0.5598
  • 22.18
  • 0.1401
  • -6.08
Eutrophication potential - freshwater (EP-freshwater)
  • 0.007685
  • 0.00007631
  • 9.032E-7
  • 0.0005512
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0.000004469
  • 0.000009694
  • 0.000001424
  • -0.0004143
Eutrophication potential - marine (EP-marine)
  • 0.1606
  • 0.00515
  • 0.0001723
  • 0.003924
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0.0003181
  • 0.01028
  • 0.000303
  • -0.008805
Eutrophication potential - terrestrial (EP-terrestrial)
  • 1.575
  • 0.05766
  • 0.001865
  • 0.04821
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0.003558
  • 0.09915
  • 0.003365
  • -0.09247
Photochemical Ozone Creation Potential (POCP)
  • 0.5354
  • 0.02207
  • 0.0005361
  • 0.0124
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0.001363
  • 0.02368
  • 0.0009641
  • -0.03498
Depletion potential of the stratospheric ozone layer (ODP)
  • 0.00001134
  • 0.000002059
  • 2.322E-8
  • 4.439E-7
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 1.267E-7
  • 1.111E-7
  • 3.651E-8
  • -0.1134
Water (user) deprivation potential (WDP)
  • 8105
  • 142.5
  • 1.95
  • 1621
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 8.181
  • 28.02
  • 7.267
  • -44.47

IndicatorUnit Production
A1-A3
Transport
A4
Installation
A5
Maintenance
B2
Repair
B3
Replacement
B4
De-construction
C1
Transport
C2
Waste processing
C3
Disposal
C4
Recycling Potential
D
1This impact category deals mainly with the eventual impact of low dose ionizing radiation on human health of the nuclear fuel cycle. It does not consider effects due to possible nuclear accidents, occupational exposure nor due to radioactive waste disposal in underground facilities. Potential ionizing radiation from the soil, from radon and from some construction materials is also not measured by this indicator.
2The results of this environmental impact indicator shall be used with care as the uncertainties on these results are high or as there is limited experiences with the indicator.
Potential Human exposure efficiency relative to U235 (IRP) 1
  • 6.426
  • 0.6039
  • 0.006584
  • 0.9283
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0.03697
  • 0.01531
  • 0.01109
  • -0.126
Potential incidence of disease due to PM emissions (PM) 2
  • 0.00001238
  • 5.479E-7
  • 7.684E-9
  • 8.905E-8
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 3.425E-8
  • 9.345E-8
  • 1.524E-8
  • -0.000001149
Potential Soil quality index (SQP) 2
  • 2688
  • 92.58
  • 1.032
  • 26
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 5.916
  • 1.13
  • 6.105
  • -151.6
Potential Comparative Toxic Unit for humans - non-cancer effects (HTP-nc) 2
  • 0.000003916
  • 1.168E-7
  • 2.577E-9
  • 8.55E-8
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 6.849E-9
  • 7.364E-8
  • 2.166E-9
  • 3.53E-7
Potential Comparative Toxic Unit for humans - cancer effects (HTP-c) 2
  • 4.218E-7
  • 0
  • 6.1E-11
  • 2.74E-9
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 2.268E-9
  • 7.4E-11
  • -2.38E-8
Potential Comparative Toxic Unit for ecosystems (ETP-fw) 2
  • 5707
  • 103.9
  • 2.052
  • 76.67
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 6.27
  • 57.04
  • 1.89
  • -371.1