Close Go back Collapse all sections
Process Data set: Protecta FR Coating (pail) (en) en

Key Data Set Information
Location GB
Geographical representativeness description Global. Transport to market is not included in this EPD.
Reference year 2024
Name
Protecta FR Coating (pail)
Use advice for data set The life cycle analysis is a cradle-to-gate (A1 - A3) study. It includes the extraction and production of raw materials and packaging, transportation to the manufacturing site, as well as the manufacturing process itself.
Technical purpose of product or process Protecta FR Coating spray grade, is an ablative sealant coating designed to enhance, seal and fire protect mineral fibres. It is based on a durable polymer system with inert fillers, non-halogenated fire retardants and a preservative to resist microbial attack. FR Coating is designed to be applied via spraying directly onto mineral fibres. The coating dries to give a sound, flexible white surface finish. During installation of mineral fibres, the cured sealant coating reduces de-lamination and increases surface stability for adhesive and fixing sealant application. The ablative property of the coating resists flame spread and protects the mineral fibres against fire penetration by significantly reducing the permeability of the mineral fibre core and prevents the passage of hot gases, thus reducing the temperature rise on the unexposed side. Mineral fibres coated with FR Coating are designed to prevent the spread of fire and smoke through openings in fire rated walls and floors. The system will also maintain the acoustic design performance and, air and smoke permeability.
Classification
Class name : Hierarchy level
  • EPDNorge: Construction / Paint
General comment on data set Data quality: Specific data for the product composition are provided by the manufacturer. The data represent the production of the declared product and were collected for EPD development in the year of study. Background data is based on EPDs according to EN 15804 and different LCA databases. The data quality of the raw materials in A1 is presented in the table below. Allocation: The allocation is made in accordance with the provisions of EN 15804. Incoming energy and water and waste production in-house is allocated equally among all products through mass allocation. Effects of primary production of recycled materials is allocated to the main product in which the material was used. The recycling process and transportation of the material is allocated to this analysis. Cut-off criteria: All major raw materials and all the essential energy is included. The production processes for raw materials and energy flows with very small amounts (less than 1%) are not included. These cut-off criteria do not apply for hazardous materials and substances.
Copyright Yes
Owner of data set
Quantitative reference
Reference flow(s)
Biogenic carbon content
  • Carbon content (biogenic): 1.0 kg
  • Carbon content (biogenic) - packaging: 1.0 kg
Time representativeness
Data set valid until 2029
Time representativeness description "2024-10-30" - "2029-10-30"
Technological representativeness
Technology description including background system Specific gravity: 1,3-1,4 kg/L Solids: > 58% (w/w) pH: 8,5 -9,2 VOC: 19 g/L Descriptions of wet film thicknesses and spreadability vary based on the intended application and fire rating; more information can be found in the technical data sheet. The product has a third-party verified ETA issued in accordance with regulation (EU) No 305/2011 on the basis of EAD 350454-00-1104, September 2017, tested to EN 1366-3, -4 & -12 in conjunction with EN 1363-1. The product hold the following approval marks: CE-Mark, UL-EU Certificate, UAE Certificate of Compliance and AS Assessment. For more information, please see https://protecta.co.uk/product/fire-rated-coating/

Indicators of life cycle

IndicatorDirectionUnit Raw material supply
A1
Transport
A2
Manufacturing
A3
Transport
A4
Installation
A5
Transport
C2
Disposal
C4
Input
  • 1.211
  • 0.01626
  • 0.2939
  • 0.02988
  • 0.3269
  • 0.0009565
  • 0.008431
Input
  • 0.03511
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0.04715
  • 0
  • 0
Input
  • 1.246
  • 0.01626
  • 0.2939
  • 0.02988
  • 0.3741
  • 0.0009565
  • 0.008431
Input
  • 13.9
  • 1.003
  • 1.067
  • 3.033
  • 1.756
  • 0.07604
  • 0.2263
Input
  • 13.75
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0.9628
  • 0
  • 0
Input
  • 27.66
  • 1.003
  • 1.067
  • 3.033
  • 2.719
  • 0.07604
  • 0.2263
Input
  • 0.07866
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0.005506
  • 0
  • 0
Input
  • 0.03617
  • 0.0007827
  • 0.0004263
  • 0.0009571
  • 0.004119
  • 0.00003346
  • 0.0001749
Input
  • 0.005999
  • 0.002061
  • 0.0004959
  • 0.002465
  • 0.005293
  • 0.0001121
  • 0.0003617
Input
  • 0.01872
  • 0.00012
  • 0.0004301
  • 0.000225
  • 0.002657
  • 0.000008652
  • 0.0002789
Output
  • 0.001816
  • 0.00005385
  • 0.00321
  • 0.0001376
  • 0.07037
  • 0.00000416
  • 0
Output
  • 0.1827
  • 0.02768
  • 0.006311
  • 0.06904
  • 0.09136
  • 0.006609
  • 1
Output
  • 0.00003151
  • 0.00000683
  • 0.000008584
  • 0.00002094
  • 0.0000049
  • 5.192E-7
  • 0
Output
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
Output
  • 0.00009883
  • 0
  • 0.0108
  • 0
  • 0.01556
  • 0
  • 0
Output
  • 0.000009387
  • 0
  • 0.01415
  • 0
  • 0.0344
  • 0
  • 0
Output
  • 0.00002154
  • 0
  • 0.00841
  • 0
  • 0.0006312
  • 0
  • 0
Output
  • 0.0003259
  • 0
  • 0.1272
  • 0
  • 0.009549
  • 0
  • 0

IndicatorUnit Raw material supply
A1
Transport
A2
Manufacturing
A3
Transport
A4
Installation
A5
Transport
C2
Disposal
C4
Abiotic depletion potential - fossil resources (ADPF)
  • 27.13
  • 1.003
  • 1.067
  • 3.033
  • 2.681
  • 0.07604
  • 0.2263
Abiotic depletion potential - non-fossil resources (ADPE)
  • 0.0000133
  • 0.000001185
  • 6.494E-7
  • 0.000003344
  • 0.000001681
  • 8.341E-8
  • 7.415E-8
Acidification potential, Accumulated Exceedance (AP)
  • 0.005806
  • 0.0008358
  • 0.0001831
  • 0.004578
  • 0.0009516
  • 0.00001507
  • 0.00007308
Global Warming Potential - biogenic (GWP-biogenic)
  • 0.001881
  • 0.00003656
  • 0.001684
  • 0.00007094
  • -0.004411
  • 0.000002005
  • 0.000009764
Global Warming Potential - fossil fuels (GWP-fossil)
  • 0.9673
  • 0.07199
  • 0.0523
  • 0.2209
  • 0.2342
  • 0.004681
  • 0.117
Global Warming Potential - total (GWP-total)
  • 0.9723
  • 0.07208
  • 0.05405
  • 0.2211
  • 0.2301
  • 0.004684
  • 0.117
Global Warming Potential - land use and land use change (GWP-luluc)
  • 0.00308
  • 0.00006563
  • 0.0000597
  • 0.0001138
  • 0.0002966
  • 0.000001426
  • 0.000002046
  • 0.9443
  • 0.07208
  • 0.06291
  • 0.2211
  • 0.2252
  • 0.004684
  • 0
Eutrophication potential - freshwater (EP-freshwater)
  • 0.00002598
  • 6.223E-7
  • 0.000001339
  • 0.000001215
  • 0.000004132
  • 3.725E-8
  • 9.431E-8
Eutrophication potential - marine (EP-marine)
  • 0.0007675
  • 0.0002481
  • 0.000037
  • 0.001129
  • 0.0001853
  • 0.000003301
  • 0.00002714
Eutrophication potential - terrestrial (EP-terrestrial)
  • 0.008385
  • 0.002745
  • 0.0004028
  • 0.01255
  • 0.002052
  • 0.00003681
  • 0.0002995
Photochemical Ozone Creation Potential (POCP)
  • 0.003207
  • 0.0007356
  • 0.0001048
  • 0.003315
  • 0.003427
  • 0.00001446
  • 0.0001111
Depletion potential of the stratospheric ozone layer (ODP)
  • 6.816E-8
  • 1.461E-8
  • 4.667E-9
  • 4.658E-8
  • 1.887E-8
  • 1.129E-9
  • 3.108E-9
Water (user) deprivation potential (WDP)
  • 38.2
  • 1.015
  • 4.617
  • 1.629
  • 6.516
  • 0.0583
  • 1.467

IndicatorUnit Raw material supply
A1
Transport
A2
Manufacturing
A3
Transport
A4
Installation
A5
Transport
C2
Disposal
C4
1This impact category deals mainly with the eventual impact of low dose ionizing radiation on human health of the nuclear fuel cycle. It does not consider effects due to possible nuclear accidents, occupational exposure nor due to radioactive waste disposal in underground facilities. Potential ionizing radiation from the soil, from radon and from some construction materials is also not measured by this indicator.
2The results of this environmental impact indicator shall be used with care as the uncertainties on these results are high or as there is limited experiences with the indicator.
Potential Human exposure efficiency relative to U235 (IRP) 1
  • 0.032
  • 0.004431
  • 0.0172
  • 0.01313
  • 0.006592
  • 0.0003323
  • 0.001041
Potential incidence of disease due to PM emissions (PM) 2
  • 3.722E-8
  • 3.032E-9
  • 7.27E-10
  • 9.052E-9
  • 5.878E-9
  • 4.3E-10
  • 1.558E-9
Potential Soil quality index (SQP) 2
  • 5.27
  • 0.633
  • 0.8973
  • 1.154
  • 1.047
  • 0.08716
  • 0.8692
Potential Comparative Toxic Unit for humans - non-cancer effects (HTP-nc) 2
  • 1.364E-8
  • 5.4E-10
  • 6.56E-10
  • 2.291E-9
  • 2.541E-9
  • 5.4E-11
  • 1.28E-10
Potential Comparative Toxic Unit for humans - cancer effects (HTP-c) 2
  • 9.84E-10
  • 0
  • 1.9E-11
  • 0
  • 1.68E-10
  • 0
  • 1.2E-11
Potential Comparative Toxic Unit for ecosystems (ETP-fw) 2
  • 12.82
  • 0.7137
  • 0.772
  • 1.958
  • 2.912
  • 0.05559
  • 0.1406