Close Go back Collapse all sections
Process Data set: JACKODUR® LIGNIN (en) en

Key Data Set Information
Location DE
Geographical representativeness description Europe
Reference year 2025
Name
JACKODUR® LIGNIN
Use advice for data set Type of EPD: cradle-to-gate (A1 - A3) – with options The following modules are considered in the Life Cycle Assessment: • Raw material supply (A1), • Transport to manufacturer (A2), • Manufacturing (A3), • Transport to construction site (A4) • Deconstruction (C1) andTransport to EoL (C2), • Wasteprocessing (C3) and Disposal (C4) with one scenarios (thermal treatment) • Reuse, recovery or recycling potential (D)
Technical purpose of product or process JACKODUR® LIGNIN is an extruded polymer foam (with lignin and rPS) produced on the basis EN 13164 and available in board shape with a density 36 kg/m3 in average (measured). Lignin is a biopolymer and is abundantly produced as a byproduct of the paper industry during the breakdown of cellulose. rPS is made from post-consumer waste. JACKODUR® LIGNIN has specifically low values of thermal conductivity. To meet the need of various applications the boards are produced with different surfaces: with the extrusion skin, planed, grooved or with thermal embossing. JACKODUR® LIGNIN boards are supplied with different edge treatments such as butt edge, ship-lap and tongue and groove. The EPD is related to an unlaminated product only; lamination and additional product treatment are not considered.
Classification
Class name : Hierarchy level
  • EPDNorge: Construction / Insulation
General comment on data set Data quality: Specific data for the product composition are provided by the manufacturer. The data represent the production of the declared product and were collected for EPD development in the year of study. Background data is based on EPDs according to EN 15804 and different LCA databases. The data quality of the raw materials in A1 is presented in the table below. Allocation: The allocation is made in accordance with the provisions of EN 15804+A2. Incoming energy and water and waste production in-house is allocated equally among all products through mass allocation. Effects of primary production of recycled materials is allocated to the main product in which the material was used. The recycling process and transportation of the material is allocated to this analysis. Cut-off criteria: All major raw materials and all the essential energy is included. The production processes for raw materials and energy flows with very small amounts (less than 1%) are not included. These cut-off criteria do not apply for hazardous materials and substances. < 0,5%
Copyright Yes
Owner of data set
Quantitative reference
Reference flow(s)
Biogenic carbon content
  • Carbon content (biogenic): 3.564570517992 kg
  • Carbon content (biogenic) - packaging: 0.0 kg
Time representativeness
Data set valid until 2030
Time representativeness description 2025-04-22 - 2030-04-22
Technological representativeness

Indicators of life cycle

IndicatorDirectionUnit Raw material supply
A1
 Transport
A2
 Manufacturing
A3
 Transport
A4
 Installation
A5
 De-construction
C1
 Transport
C2
 Waste processing
C3
 Disposal
C4
 Recycling Potential
D
Input
  • 43.57
  • 0.5293
  • 189.8
  • 0.6816
  • 0.005368
  • 0
  • 0.03431
  • 0.1822
  • 0.002668
  • -473.9
Input
  • 141.6
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • -141.6
  • 0
  • 0
Input
  • 185.2
  • 0.5293
  • 189.8
  • 0.6816
  • 0.005368
  • 0
  • 0.03431
  • -141.4
  • 0.002668
  • -473.9
Input
  • 130.3
  • 36.98
  • 17.23
  • 47.62
  • 0.2126
  • 0
  • 2.728
  • 6.33
  • 0.04579
  • -379.6
Input
  • 25.42
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
Input
  • 155.7
  • 36.98
  • 17.23
  • 47.62
  • 0.2126
  • 0
  • 2.728
  • 6.33
  • 0.04579
  • -379.6
Input
  • 25.2
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
Input
  • 0.1726
  • 0.01894
  • 0.03295
  • 0.02439
  • 0.0001408
  • 0
  • 0.0012
  • 0.00508
  • 0.00006634
  • -0.04769
Input
  • 0.07686
  • 0.0677
  • 0.001753
  • 0.08719
  • 0.0003686
  • 0
  • 0.004022
  • 0
  • 0.01056
  • -31.3
Input
  • 0.07282
  • 0.003954
  • 0.04591
  • 0.005092
  • 0.0001124
  • 0
  • 0.0003104
  • 0.0179
  • 0.00004208
  • -0.4424
Output
  • 0.039
  • 0.001907
  • 0.01988
  • 0.002456
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0.0001492
  • 0
  • 0.08354
  • -0.006513
Output
  • 0.8753
  • 1.798
  • 1.596
  • 2.316
  • 0.651
  • 0
  • 0.2371
  • 0
  • 0.04137
  • -1.83
Output
  • 0.0003709
  • 0.0002519
  • 0.00004979
  • 0.0003244
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0.00001862
  • 0
  • 2.762E-7
  • -0.0004111
Output
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
Output
  • 0.003196
  • 0
  • 0.3888
  • 0
  • 0.3323
  • 0
  • 0
  • 3.6
  • 0
  • 0
Output
  • 0.0003155
  • 0
  • 0.09068
  • 0
  • 0.00003255
  • 0
  • 0
  • 32.4
  • 0
  • 0
Output
  • 0.0008252
  • 0
  • 0.1353
  • 0
  • 0.00005001
  • 0
  • 0
  • 57.1
  • 0
  • 0
Output
  • 0.01248
  • 0
  • 2.047
  • 0
  • 0.0007566
  • 0
  • 0
  • 863.8
  • 0
  • 0

IndicatorUnit Raw material supply
A1
 Transport
A2
 Manufacturing
A3
 Transport
A4
 Installation
A5
 De-construction
C1
 Transport
C2
 Waste processing
C3
 Disposal
C4
 Recycling Potential
D
Abiotic depletion potential - fossil resources (ADPF)
  • 154.7
  • 36.97
  • 17.23
  • 47.61
  • 0.2126
  • 0
  • 2.728
  • 6.33
  • 0.04579
  • -379.6
Abiotic depletion potential - non-fossil resources (ADPE)
  • 0.00008544
  • 0.00006755
  • 0.0001802
  • 0.00008699
  • 2.745E-7
  • 0
  • 0.000002992
  • 0.000003191
  • 2.819E-8
  • -0.00003796
Acidification potential, Accumulated Exceedance (AP)
  • 0.07062
  • 0.007028
  • 0.01054
  • 0.009051
  • 0.00006356
  • 0
  • 0.0005407
  • 0.01228
  • 0.00001771
  • -0.09317
Global Warming Potential - biogenic (GWP-biogenic)
  • -13.04
  • 0.001012
  • 0.004637
  • 0.001303
  • 0.000007117
  • 0
  • 0.00007193
  • 0.0007121
  • 0.000002669
  • -0.09227
Global Warming Potential - fossil fuels (GWP-fossil)
  • 6.067
  • 2.445
  • 1.575
  • 3.149
  • 0.05156
  • 0
  • 0.1679
  • 103.3
  • 0.005033
  • -19.14
Global Warming Potential - total (GWP-total)
  • -6.949
  • 2.447
  • 1.581
  • 3.152
  • 0.05157
  • 0
  • 0.168
  • 103.3
  • 0.005036
  • -19.44
Global Warming Potential - land use and land use change (GWP-luluc)
  • 0.02667
  • 0.0008704
  • 0.001697
  • 0.001121
  • 0.000003955
  • 0
  • 0.00005116
  • 0.0001128
  • 7.719E-7
  • -0.2053
  • 6.116
  • 2.447
  • 1.581
  • 3.151
  • 0.05157
  • 0
  • 0.168
  • 103.3
  • 0.005225
  • -19.34
Eutrophication potential - freshwater (EP-freshwater)
  • 0.0002651
  • 0.00001954
  • 0.00009232
  • 0.00002516
  • 1.061E-7
  • 0
  • 0.000001336
  • 0.00000731
  • 6.799E-8
  • -0.0007455
Eutrophication potential - marine (EP-marine)
  • 0.01189
  • 0.001391
  • 0.001681
  • 0.001791
  • 0.00005815
  • 0
  • 0.0001184
  • 0.005909
  • 0.000005532
  • -0.02286
Eutrophication potential - terrestrial (EP-terrestrial)
  • 0.1307
  • 0.01555
  • 0.01834
  • 0.02003
  • 0.0002278
  • 0
  • 0.001321
  • 0.06325
  • 0.00006295
  • -0.2461
Photochemical Ozone Creation Potential (POCP)
  • 0.04514
  • 0.005958
  • 0.006371
  • 0.007673
  • 0.00007493
  • 0
  • 0.0005186
  • 0.01516
  • 0.00001737
  • -0.08758
Depletion potential of the stratospheric ozone layer (ODP)
  • 0.000001015
  • 5.539E-7
  • 1.196E-7
  • 7.133E-7
  • 3.096E-9
  • 0
  • 4.049E-8
  • 7.41E-8
  • 5.4E-10
  • -0.437
Water (user) deprivation potential (WDP)
  • 672
  • 35.76
  • 42.72
  • 46.06
  • 0.7516
  • 0
  • 2.091
  • 14.04
  • 0.4744
  • -306.9

IndicatorUnit Raw material supply
A1
 Transport
A2
 Manufacturing
A3
 Transport
A4
 Installation
A5
 De-construction
C1
 Transport
C2
 Waste processing
C3
 Disposal
C4
 Recycling Potential
D
1This impact category deals mainly with the eventual impact of low dose ionizing radiation on human health of the nuclear fuel cycle. It does not consider effects due to possible nuclear accidents, occupational exposure nor due to radioactive waste disposal in underground facilities. Potential ionizing radiation from the soil, from radon and from some construction materials is also not measured by this indicator.
2The results of this environmental impact indicator shall be used with care as the uncertainties on these results are high or as there is limited experiences with the indicator.
Potential Human exposure efficiency relative to U235 (IRP) 1
  • 0.4241
  • 0.1616
  • 0.04986
  • 0.2081
  • 0.000961
  • 0
  • 0.01192
  • 0.01058
  • 0.0002173
  • -0.4691
Potential incidence of disease due to PM emissions (PM) 2
  • 3.302E-7
  • 1.497E-7
  • 1.026E-7
  • 1.928E-7
  • 1.143E-9
  • 0
  • 1.542E-8
  • 5.174E-8
  • 2.2E-10
  • -0.000003409
Potential Soil quality index (SQP) 2
  • 514.2
  • 25.86
  • 37.04
  • 33.31
  • 0.3712
  • 0
  • 3.127
  • 0.7537
  • 0.1263
  • -571.6
Potential Comparative Toxic Unit for humans - non-cancer effects (HTP-nc) 2
  • 8.102E-8
  • 2.994E-8
  • 9.517E-8
  • 3.856E-8
  • 1.92E-10
  • 0
  • 1.928E-9
  • 1.716E-7
  • 1.55E-10
  • -4.504E-7
Potential Comparative Toxic Unit for humans - cancer effects (HTP-c) 2
  • 2.444E-9
  • 0
  • 5.011E-9
  • 0
  • 5E-12
  • 0
  • 0
  • 4.342E-9
  • 4E-12
  • -1.028E-8
Potential Comparative Toxic Unit for ecosystems (ETP-fw) 2
  • 163.5
  • 27.41
  • 71.49
  • 35.3
  • 0.2029
  • 0
  • 1.994
  • 15.27
  • 0.08416
  • -498.9