Close Go back Collapse all sections
Process Data set: Profim Vancouver Oto (en) en

Key Data Set Information
Location PL
Geographical representativeness description Worldwide
Reference year 2024
Name
Profim Vancouver Oto
Technical purpose of product or process Vancouver Oto is a line of pouffes and tables with universal forms of geometric solids which allows for adaptation in any interior. This furniture allows for any arrangement and is perfect for casual, informal meetings and conversations. Collection features: – available in two sizes and two shapes – the set is also available as a pouffe + table in the version with an added glass top – possibility of connecting cubic pouffes by means of a linking element The model studied in detail in this declaration is the Profim Vancouver Oto VOR2 – small round pouffe upholstered (Xtreme/Camira) – including carton box packaging. The key environmental indicators for the other models and options of the Profim Vancouver Oto are presented on a table page 11 of this declaration.
Classification
Class name : Hierarchy level
  • EPDNorge: Furniture / Soft seating
General comment on data set Data quality: Specific data for the product composition are provided by the manufacturer. They represent the production of the declared product and were collected for EPD development in the year of study. Background data is based on registered EPDs according to EN 15804, Ostfold Research databases, ecoinvent and other LCA databases. The data quality of the raw materials in A1 is presented in the table below. Allocation: The allocation is made in accordance with the provisions of EN 15804. Incoming energy and water and waste production in-house is allocated equally among all products through mass allocation. Effects of primary production of recycled materials is allocated to the main product in which the material was used. The recycling process and transportation of the material is allocated to this analysis. Cut-off criteria: All major raw materials and all the essential energy is included. The production processes for raw materials and energy flows with very small amounts (less than 1%) are not included. These cut-off criteria do not apply for hazardous materials and substances.
Copyright Yes
Owner of data set
Quantitative reference
Reference flow(s)
Biogenic carbon content
  • Carbon content (biogenic): 1.667387273034 kg
  • Carbon content (biogenic) - packaging: 0.608560447282 kg
Time representativeness
Data set valid until 2029
Time representativeness description "2024-10-14" - "2029-10-14"
Technological representativeness
Technology description including background system Wooden frame: Made of chipboard, MDF, plywood and solid wood. Table top: Seasoned milk glass (G1). Glides: Standard – hard glides (for soft floors). Option – felt glides (for hard floors). Seat: Top – cold molded foam – density 65 kg/m3. Sides part – cut foam- density 40 kg/m3.

Indicators of life cycle

IndicatorDirectionUnit Production
A1-A3
Transport
A4
Installation
A5
Maintenance
B2
Repair
B3
Replacement
B4
De-construction
C1
Transport
C2
Waste processing
C3
Disposal
C4
Recycling Potential
D
Input
  • 92.61
  • 0.1136
  • 0.005632
  • 19.88
  • 0.9053
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0.01924
  • 0.08401
  • 0.003785
  • -29.38
Input
  • 43.16
  • 0
  • -7.902
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • -35.25
  • 0
  • 0
Input
  • 135.8
  • 0.1136
  • -7.896
  • 19.88
  • 0.9053
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0.01924
  • -35.17
  • 0.003785
  • -29.38
Input
  • 125.5
  • 9.022
  • 0.3265
  • 108.3
  • 4.876
  • 0
  • 0
  • 1.364
  • 1.176
  • 0.06671
  • -5.215
Input
  • 33.78
  • 0
  • -3.511
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • -30.26
  • 0
  • 0
Input
  • 159.2
  • 9.022
  • -3.184
  • 108.3
  • 4.876
  • 0
  • 0
  • 1.364
  • -29.09
  • 0.06671
  • -5.215
Input
  • 1.851
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
Input
  • 0.2553
  • 0.003972
  • 0.0001817
  • 1.383
  • 0.06265
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0.0006887
  • 0.001894
  • 0.0000837
  • -0.003143
Input
  • 0.1139
  • 0.01331
  • 0.0007199
  • 0.3697
  • 0.01507
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0.002459
  • 0
  • 0.01539
  • -1.681
Input
  • 0.1742
  • 0.001027
  • 0.0001557
  • 0.8694
  • 0.00399
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0.0001436
  • 0.002704
  • 0.0000724
  • -0.03545
Output
  • 0.1666
  • 0.0004939
  • 0
  • 0.01871
  • 0.0008389
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0.00006954
  • 0
  • 0.1407
  • -0.0005105
Output
  • 2.261
  • 0.7848
  • 1.403
  • 0.4238
  • 0.01731
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0.06517
  • 0.035
  • 0.03095
  • -0.1348
Output
  • 0.000414
  • 0.00006159
  • 0
  • 0.0007213
  • 0.00003265
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0.000009297
  • 0
  • 3.036E-7
  • -0.00002472
Output
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
Output
  • 0.8328
  • 0
  • 1.268
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0.05022
  • 0
  • 0
Output
  • 0.000006605
  • 0
  • 0.001824
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 4.979
  • 0
  • 0
Output
  • 0.4604
  • 0
  • 0.07516
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 3.636
  • 0
  • 0
Output
  • 6.966
  • 0
  • 1.137
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 55.01
  • 0
  • 0

IndicatorUnit Production
A1-A3
Transport
A4
Installation
A5
Maintenance
B2
Repair
B3
Replacement
B4
De-construction
C1
Transport
C2
Waste processing
C3
Disposal
C4
Recycling Potential
D
Abiotic depletion potential - fossil resources (ADPF)
  • 159.2
  • 9.022
  • 0.3265
  • 108.1
  • 4.869
  • 0
  • 0
  • 1.363
  • 1.164
  • 0.06664
  • -5.216
Abiotic depletion potential - non-fossil resources (ADPE)
  • 0.0005073
  • 0.000009905
  • 5.55E-7
  • 0.0000434
  • 0.000001689
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0.000002449
  • 6.686E-7
  • 4.105E-8
  • -0.000004258
Acidification potential, Accumulated Exceedance (AP)
  • 0.05575
  • 0.002438
  • 0.0001094
  • 0.03219
  • 0.00144
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0.0003696
  • 0.001681
  • 0.00002439
  • -0.003011
Global Warming Potential - biogenic (GWP-biogenic)
  • -8.055
  • 0.000238
  • 2.231
  • 0.0361
  • 0.001618
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0.00003687
  • 7.192
  • 0.000008125
  • -0.0007163
Global Warming Potential - fossil fuels (GWP-fossil)
  • 9.821
  • 0.58
  • 0.02833
  • 5.62
  • 0.2516
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0.09042
  • 1.225
  • 0.007118
  • -0.3874
Global Warming Potential - total (GWP-total)
  • 1.786
  • 0.5804
  • 2.26
  • 5.668
  • 0.2538
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0.09049
  • 8.418
  • 0.007127
  • -0.3996
Global Warming Potential - land use and land use change (GWP-luluc)
  • 0.02021
  • 0.0001693
  • 0.000007572
  • 0.01266
  • 0.0005745
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0.00003161
  • 0.0000336
  • 0.000001085
  • -0.01147
  • 9.735
  • 0.5804
  • 0.02833
  • 5.988
  • 0.2688
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0.09049
  • 2.43
  • 0.009459
  • -0.4221
Eutrophication potential - freshwater (EP-freshwater)
  • 0.0005187
  • 0.000004423
  • 1.891E-7
  • 0.0005475
  • 0.00002473
  • 0
  • 0
  • 7.101E-7
  • 0.000003062
  • 8.133E-8
  • -0.00003292
Eutrophication potential - marine (EP-marine)
  • 0.01357
  • 0.0007331
  • 0.00004127
  • 0.004311
  • 0.000191
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0.0001096
  • 0.0008469
  • 0.000007648
  • -0.0009515
Eutrophication potential - terrestrial (EP-terrestrial)
  • 0.1486
  • 0.008108
  • 0.0003916
  • 0.0522
  • 0.002318
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0.001212
  • 0.008483
  • 0.00008672
  • -0.01025
Photochemical Ozone Creation Potential (POCP)
  • 0.04618
  • 0.002607
  • 0.0001139
  • 0.01353
  • 0.0005935
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0.0003712
  • 0.00205
  • 0.00002432
  • -0.002945
Depletion potential of the stratospheric ozone layer (ODP)
  • 9.489E-7
  • 1.34E-7
  • 4.911E-9
  • 4.392E-7
  • 1.953E-8
  • 0
  • 0
  • 2.061E-8
  • 1.84E-8
  • 8.08E-10
  • -0.0242
Water (user) deprivation potential (WDP)
  • 1.275E+4
  • 6.921
  • 0.4799
  • 1506
  • 66.97
  • 0
  • 0
  • 1.301
  • 2.994
  • 0.6917
  • -56.29

IndicatorUnit Production
A1-A3
Transport
A4
Installation
A5
Maintenance
B2
Repair
B3
Replacement
B4
De-construction
C1
Transport
C2
Waste processing
C3
Disposal
C4
Recycling Potential
D
1This impact category deals mainly with the eventual impact of low dose ionizing radiation on human health of the nuclear fuel cycle. It does not consider effects due to possible nuclear accidents, occupational exposure nor due to radioactive waste disposal in underground facilities. Potential ionizing radiation from the soil, from radon and from some construction materials is also not measured by this indicator.
2The results of this environmental impact indicator shall be used with care as the uncertainties on these results are high or as there is limited experiences with the indicator.
Potential Human exposure efficiency relative to U235 (IRP) 1
  • 0.4122
  • 0.03943
  • 0.001404
  • 0.8896
  • 0.04033
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0.00596
  • 0.002931
  • 0.0003092
  • -0.03015
Potential incidence of disease due to PM emissions (PM) 2
  • 8.908E-7
  • 5.106E-8
  • 1.642E-9
  • 1.141E-7
  • 4.749E-9
  • 0
  • 0
  • 6.51E-9
  • 1.187E-8
  • 3.15E-10
  • -1.704E-7
Potential Soil quality index (SQP) 2
  • 307.5
  • 10.35
  • 0.2504
  • 25.32
  • 1.131
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0.9401
  • 0.2362
  • 0.1793
  • -31.8
Potential Comparative Toxic Unit for humans - non-cancer effects (HTP-nc) 2
  • 1.521E-7
  • 6.382E-9
  • 5.25E-10
  • 8.809E-8
  • 3.369E-9
  • 0
  • 0
  • 1.085E-9
  • 1.085E-8
  • 1.89E-10
  • -1.899E-8
Potential Comparative Toxic Unit for humans - cancer effects (HTP-c) 2
  • 3.03E-8
  • 0
  • 1.3E-11
  • 2.793E-9
  • 9.7E-11
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 2.98E-10
  • 4E-12
  • -7.38E-10
Potential Comparative Toxic Unit for ecosystems (ETP-fw) 2
  • 444
  • 6.598
  • 0.4244
  • 86.63
  • 3.84
  • 0
  • 0
  • 1.004
  • 5.078
  • 0.1065
  • -28.92