Close Go back Collapse all sections
Process Data set: HÅG Creed (en) en

Key Data Set Information
Location NO
Geographical representativeness description Worldwide
Reference year 2024
Name
HÅG Creed
Technical purpose of product or process The HÅG Creed blends inspiration from two groundbreaking chairs, the HÅG H04 and HÅG H05, both crafted by the legendary designer Peter Opsvik. This chair is powered by the signature HÅG inBalance® movement mechanism, which seamlessly adapts to your every posture shift, no matter how subtle. Its innovative "4-in-1" adjustment wheel simplifies personalization, enabling you to effortlessly modify seat depth, backrest height, and tilt-resistance in a single, fluid motion. The HÅG Creed also features redesigned HÅG SwingBack™ armrests, offering a sleeker, square design while maintaining smooth transitions between positions. The model studied in this declaration is the HÅG Creed 6004, including packaging. The model declared does not include any options such as armrests, etc. The key environmental indicators for the other models of the family, and applicable options of the product collection are presented in a table on page 12 of this declaration.
Classification
Class name : Hierarchy level
  • EPDNorge: Furniture / Soft seating
General comment on data set Data quality: Specific data for the product composition are provided by the manufacturer. They represent the production of the declared product and were collected for EPD development in the year of study. Background data is based on registered EPDs according to EN 15804, Ostfold Research databases, ecoinvent and other LCA databases. The data quality of the raw materials in A1 is presented in the table below. Allocation: The allocation is made in accordance with the provisions of EN 15804. Incoming energy and water and waste production in-house is allocated equally among all products through mass allocation. Effects of primary production of recycled materials is allocated to the main product in which the material was used. The recycling process and transportation of the material is allocated to this analysis. Cut-off criteria: All major raw materials and all the essential energy is included. The production processes for raw materials and energy flows with very small amounts (less than 1%) are not included. These cut-off criteria do not apply for hazardous materials and substances.
Copyright Yes
Owner of data set
Quantitative reference
Reference flow(s)
Biogenic carbon content
  • Carbon content (biogenic): 0.007075471695 kg
  • Carbon content (biogenic) - packaging: 1.042819792183 kg
Time representativeness
Data set valid until 2029
Time representativeness description 2024-11-22 - 2029-11-22
Technological representativeness
Technology description including background system Total weight: 13,64 kg (packaging excluded) Total weight: 16,00 kg (packaging included)

Indicators of life cycle

IndicatorDirectionUnit Production
A1-A3
Transport
A4
Installation
A5
Maintenance
B2
Repair
B3
Replacement
B4
De-construction
C1
Transport
C2
Waste processing
C3
Disposal
C4
Recycling Potential
D
Input
  • 144.1
  • 0.2847
  • 0.009245
  • 12.24
  • 1.984
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0.05657
  • 0.09779
  • 0.03388
  • -54.39
Input
  • 25.41
  • 0
  • -21.96
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • -0.2118
  • 0
  • 0
Input
  • 175.3
  • 0.2847
  • -21.95
  • 12.24
  • 1.984
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0.05657
  • -0.114
  • 0.03387
  • -54.39
Input
  • 449.9
  • 22.64
  • 0.5435
  • 71.6
  • 2.049
  • 0
  • 0
  • 3.952
  • 2.635
  • 1.706
  • -28.57
Input
  • 149.6
  • 0
  • -4.396
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • -145.2
  • 0
  • 0
Input
  • 691.1
  • 22.64
  • -3.853
  • 71.6
  • 2.049
  • 0
  • 0
  • 3.952
  • -142.6
  • 1.706
  • -28.57
Input
  • 6.88
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
Input
  • 0.8285
  • 0.00996
  • 0.0003007
  • 0.7763
  • 0.02004
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0.002024
  • 0.00232
  • 0.0008921
  • 0.0623
Input
  • 0.168
  • 0.03338
  • 0.001206
  • 0.7361
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0.007236
  • 0
  • 0.04736
  • -0.9758
Input
  • 1.21
  • 0.002576
  • 0.0002584
  • 11.78
  • 0.009027
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0.0004226
  • 0.007987
  • 0.001539
  • -0.07335
Output
  • 0.5397
  • 0.001239
  • 0
  • 0.01324
  • 0.0001891
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0.0002038
  • 0
  • 6.615
  • -0.0096
Output
  • 9.877
  • 1.967
  • 2.356
  • 0.8506
  • 0.01253
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0.1922
  • 0.5253
  • 0.1316
  • -1.09
Output
  • 0.003044
  • 0.0001546
  • 0
  • 0.0004326
  • 0.00002114
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0.00002692
  • 0
  • 0.00001063
  • -0.00005245
Output
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
Output
  • 3.002
  • 0
  • 2.148
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 2.341
  • 0
  • 0
Output
  • 0.00001128
  • 0
  • 0.0009869
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 13.64
  • 0
  • 0
Output
  • 0.1789
  • 0
  • 0.1288
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 6.557
  • 0
  • 0
Output
  • 2.707
  • 0
  • 1.949
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 99.2
  • 0
  • 0

IndicatorUnit Production
A1-A3
Transport
A4
Installation
A5
Maintenance
B2
Repair
B3
Replacement
B4
De-construction
C1
Transport
C2
Waste processing
C3
Disposal
C4
Recycling Potential
D
Abiotic depletion potential - fossil resources (ADPF)
  • 642.4
  • 22.64
  • 0.5435
  • 71.48
  • 2.018
  • 0
  • 0
  • 3.952
  • 2.575
  • 1.706
  • -28.57
Abiotic depletion potential - non-fossil resources (ADPE)
  • 0.01042
  • 0.00002483
  • 9.304E-7
  • 0.0001139
  • 0.000001161
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0.000007219
  • 0.000001533
  • 0.000001281
  • -0.00003976
Acidification potential, Accumulated Exceedance (AP)
  • 0.2123
  • 0.004487
  • 0.0001826
  • 0.02391
  • 0.0003444
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0.0007511
  • 0.004505
  • 0.0005314
  • -0.01655
Global Warming Potential - biogenic (GWP-biogenic)
  • -3.559
  • 0.0005969
  • 3.824
  • 0.02725
  • 0.001365
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0.0001082
  • 0.5435
  • 0.00005918
  • -0.003551
Global Warming Potential - fossil fuels (GWP-fossil)
  • 46.6
  • 1.394
  • 0.04463
  • 4.12
  • 0.07468
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0.2613
  • 11.58
  • 0.0782
  • -2.847
Global Warming Potential - total (GWP-total)
  • 43.09
  • 1.395
  • 3.868
  • 4.159
  • 0.08014
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0.2615
  • 12.13
  • 0.07829
  • -2.876
Global Warming Potential - land use and land use change (GWP-luluc)
  • 0.0507
  • 0.0004246
  • 0.00001268
  • 0.01255
  • 0.004091
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0.00009302
  • 0.00006342
  • 0.0000227
  • -0.02622
  • 37.2
  • 1.395
  • 0.02213
  • 4.2
  • 0.1086
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0.2615
  • 11.59
  • 0.08127
  • -3.844
Eutrophication potential - freshwater (EP-freshwater)
  • 0.001867
  • 0.00001109
  • 3.16E-7
  • 0.0003279
  • 0.00000494
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0.000002088
  • 0.000003844
  • 8.017E-7
  • -0.000185
Eutrophication potential - marine (EP-marine)
  • 0.04476
  • 0.0009826
  • 0.00006631
  • 0.003794
  • 0.00005441
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0.0001486
  • 0.002343
  • 0.0001885
  • -0.003857
Eutrophication potential - terrestrial (EP-terrestrial)
  • 0.4366
  • 0.01096
  • 0.000654
  • 0.04426
  • 0.0007306
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0.001662
  • 0.02323
  • 0.002087
  • -0.04054
Photochemical Ozone Creation Potential (POCP)
  • 0.1415
  • 0.004304
  • 0.0001895
  • 0.01383
  • 0.0001712
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0.0006368
  • 0.005608
  • 0.0006001
  • -0.01554
Depletion potential of the stratospheric ozone layer (ODP)
  • 0.000002189
  • 3.36E-7
  • 8.181E-9
  • 3.674E-7
  • 8.08E-9
  • 0
  • 0
  • 5.92E-8
  • 3.608E-8
  • 2.297E-8
  • -0.04271
Water (user) deprivation potential (WDP)
  • 3673
  • 17.35
  • 0.7655
  • 1457
  • 156
  • 0
  • 0
  • 3.822
  • 3.733
  • 3.836
  • -156.1

IndicatorUnit Production
A1-A3
Transport
A4
Installation
A5
Maintenance
B2
Repair
B3
Replacement
B4
De-construction
C1
Transport
C2
Waste processing
C3
Disposal
C4
Recycling Potential
D
1This impact category deals mainly with the eventual impact of low dose ionizing radiation on human health of the nuclear fuel cycle. It does not consider effects due to possible nuclear accidents, occupational exposure nor due to radioactive waste disposal in underground facilities. Potential ionizing radiation from the soil, from radon and from some construction materials is also not measured by this indicator.
2The results of this environmental impact indicator shall be used with care as the uncertainties on these results are high or as there is limited experiences with the indicator.
Potential Human exposure efficiency relative to U235 (IRP) 1
  • 1.634
  • 0.09893
  • 0.002334
  • 0.5418
  • 0.04602
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0.01727
  • 0.005142
  • 0.006879
  • -0.06136
Potential incidence of disease due to PM emissions (PM) 2
  • 0.000002704
  • 1.28E-7
  • 2.725E-9
  • 1.991E-7
  • 1.825E-9
  • 0
  • 0
  • 1.6E-8
  • 2.968E-8
  • 9.597E-9
  • -4.768E-7
Potential Soil quality index (SQP) 2
  • 385.8
  • 25.95
  • 0.401
  • 21.37
  • 1.52
  • 0
  • 0
  • 2.764
  • 0.3696
  • 3.732
  • -57.34
Potential Comparative Toxic Unit for humans - non-cancer effects (HTP-nc) 2
  • 7.414E-7
  • 1.6E-8
  • 8.84E-10
  • 2.486E-7
  • 1.55E-9
  • 0
  • 0
  • 3.2E-9
  • 2.097E-8
  • 1.123E-9
  • 1.564E-7
Potential Comparative Toxic Unit for humans - cancer effects (HTP-c) 2
  • 6.71E-8
  • 0
  • 2E-11
  • 1.117E-8
  • 5.9E-11
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 8.21E-10
  • 3.7E-11
  • -1.108E-8
Potential Comparative Toxic Unit for ecosystems (ETP-fw) 2
  • 1184
  • 16.55
  • 0.712
  • 77.92
  • 2.526
  • 0
  • 0
  • 2.929
  • 30.78
  • 1.08
  • -160.6