Close Go back Collapse all sections
Process Data set: Profim Zoo (en) en

Key Data Set Information
Location PL
Geographical representativeness description Worldwide
Reference year 2024
Name
Profim Zoo
Technical purpose of product or process Versatile chairs with stylish comfort. Paul Brooks designed the ZOO collection which features stylish comfort. It is perfect as a background for small business meetings or in conference or lecture rooms. The model studied in detail in this declaration is the Profim Zoo with upholstered seat in Xtreme fabric form Camira and plastic back without armrests — including carton box packaging. The key environmental indicators for the other models and options of the Profim Zoo are presented on a table page 12 of this declaration.
Classification
Class name : Hierarchy level
  • EPDNorge: Furniture / Soft seating
General comment on data set Data quality: Specific data for the product composition are provided by the manufacturer. They represent the production of the declared product and were collected for EPD development in the year of study. Background data is based on registered EPDs according to EN 15804, Ostfold Research databases, ecoinvent and other LCA databases. The data quality of the raw materials in A1 is presented in the table below. Allocation: The allocation is made in accordance with the provisions of EN 15804. Incoming energy and water and waste production in-house is allocated equally among all products through mass allocation. Effects of primary production of recycled materials is allocated to the main product in which the material was used. The recycling process and transportation of the material is allocated to this analysis. Cut-off criteria: All major raw materials and all the essential energy is included. The production processes for raw materials and energy flows with very small amounts (less than 1%) are not included. These cut-off criteria do not apply for hazardous materials and substances.
Copyright Yes
Owner of data set
Quantitative reference
Reference flow(s)
Biogenic carbon content
  • Carbon content (biogenic): 0.002830188678 kg
  • Carbon content (biogenic) - packaging: 1.988644304836 kg
Time representativeness
Data set valid until 2029
Time representativeness description "2024-11-27" - "2029-11-27"
Technological representativeness
Technology description including background system Collection features: — variety of configurations — available in different versions: on four legs, legs with castors, with plastic or upholstered seat, plastic or upholstered backrest, with or without armrests — available in three plastic colours (black, grey and light grey) and five frame colours Product versions: 522 — plastic seat and backrest 502 — upholstered seat and plastic backrest 500 — upholstered set and backrest Frame versions: H — four legs with glides (teflon or felt) HC — four legs with castors 2P — polyamide armrests CTH — trolley Table top: Zoo model may occur with integrated table top (2PB). Right hand table top available as a standard. It's always black composite. Possibility of stacking.

Indicators of life cycle

IndicatorDirectionUnit Production
A1-A3
Transport
A4
Installation
A5
Maintenance
B2
Repair
B3
Replacement
B4
De-construction
C1
Transport
C2
Waste processing
C3
Disposal
C4
Recycling Potential
D
Input
  • 110.8
  • 0.2133
  • 0.01943
  • 19.88
  • 0.9053
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0.03615
  • 0.03326
  • 0.01502
  • -41.93
Input
  • 30.31
  • 0
  • -30.22
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • -0.08472
  • 0
  • 0
Input
  • 141.1
  • 0.2133
  • -30.2
  • 19.88
  • 0.9053
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0.03615
  • -0.05146
  • 0.01502
  • -41.93
Input
  • 388.1
  • 16.95
  • 1.088
  • 108.3
  • 4.876
  • 0
  • 0
  • 2.562
  • 0.9421
  • 0.7308
  • -16.97
Input
  • 112.6
  • 0
  • -3.551
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • -109
  • 0
  • 0
Input
  • 500.7
  • 16.95
  • -2.463
  • 108.3
  • 4.876
  • 0
  • 0
  • 2.562
  • -108.1
  • 0.7308
  • -16.97
Input
  • 4.032
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • -0.00005748
Input
  • 1.129
  • 0.007462
  • 0.0006141
  • 1.383
  • 0.06265
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0.001294
  • 0.000805
  • 0.0003942
  • 0.03705
Input
  • 0.283
  • 0.02501
  • 0.003853
  • 0.3697
  • 0.01507
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0.004619
  • 0
  • 0.02619
  • -1.147
Input
  • 0.3202
  • 0.00193
  • 0.0005946
  • 0.8694
  • 0.00399
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0.0002698
  • 0.00238
  • 0.0006593
  • -0.05208
Output
  • 0.2339
  • 0.0009278
  • 0
  • 0.01871
  • 0.0008389
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0.0001306
  • 0
  • 2.78
  • -0.006691
Output
  • 6.551
  • 1.474
  • 4.382
  • 0.4238
  • 0.01731
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0.1224
  • 0.05816
  • 0.06164
  • -0.6584
Output
  • 0.001118
  • 0.0001157
  • 0
  • 0.0007213
  • 0.00003265
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0.00001747
  • 0
  • 0.000004499
  • -0.00003147
Output
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
Output
  • 0.8328
  • 0
  • 3.128
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 1.388
  • 0
  • -0.000007738
Output
  • 0.000006605
  • 0
  • 0.9816
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 7.608
  • 0
  • -9.334E-7
Output
  • 0.4604
  • 0
  • 0.8711
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 5.292
  • 0
  • -0.000005875
Output
  • 6.966
  • 0
  • 13.18
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 80.06
  • 0
  • -0.00008888

IndicatorUnit Production
A1-A3
Transport
A4
Installation
A5
Maintenance
B2
Repair
B3
Replacement
B4
De-construction
C1
Transport
C2
Waste processing
C3
Disposal
C4
Recycling Potential
D
Abiotic depletion potential - fossil resources (ADPF)
  • 500.1
  • 16.95
  • 1.088
  • 108.1
  • 4.869
  • 0
  • 0
  • 2.561
  • 0.9293
  • 0.7307
  • -16.98
Abiotic depletion potential - non-fossil resources (ADPE)
  • 0.0006593
  • 0.00001861
  • 0.000001769
  • 0.0000434
  • 0.000001689
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0.000004601
  • 5.322E-7
  • 5.469E-7
  • -0.00003033
Acidification potential, Accumulated Exceedance (AP)
  • 0.1364
  • 0.00458
  • 0.0004744
  • 0.03219
  • 0.00144
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0.0006944
  • 0.001523
  • 0.0002286
  • -0.009995
Global Warming Potential - biogenic (GWP-biogenic)
  • -6.921
  • 0.0004472
  • 7.292
  • 0.0361
  • 0.001618
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0.00006926
  • 0.6415
  • 0.00002747
  • -0.001641
Global Warming Potential - fossil fuels (GWP-fossil)
  • 26.69
  • 1.09
  • 0.08686
  • 5.62
  • 0.2516
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0.1699
  • 7.871
  • 0.03433
  • -1.691
Global Warming Potential - total (GWP-total)
  • 19.82
  • 1.09
  • 7.379
  • 5.668
  • 0.2538
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0.17
  • 8.512
  • 0.03436
  • -1.71
Global Warming Potential - land use and land use change (GWP-luluc)
  • 0.04341
  • 0.0003181
  • 0.00002503
  • 0.01266
  • 0.0005745
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0.00005938
  • 0.00002036
  • 0.00000977
  • -0.01658
  • 26.72
  • 1.09
  • 0.08689
  • 5.988
  • 0.2688
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0.17
  • 8.511
  • 0.03605
  • -2.312
Eutrophication potential - freshwater (EP-freshwater)
  • 0.001335
  • 0.000008309
  • 7.705E-7
  • 0.0005475
  • 0.00002473
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0.000001334
  • 0.000001555
  • 3.566E-7
  • -0.0001173
Eutrophication potential - marine (EP-marine)
  • 0.02879
  • 0.001377
  • 0.0001827
  • 0.004311
  • 0.000191
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0.0002059
  • 0.0007434
  • 0.00008089
  • -0.002517
Eutrophication potential - terrestrial (EP-terrestrial)
  • 0.313
  • 0.01523
  • 0.001914
  • 0.0522
  • 0.002318
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0.002278
  • 0.00776
  • 0.0008972
  • -0.02648
Photochemical Ozone Creation Potential (POCP)
  • 0.1082
  • 0.004898
  • 0.0005218
  • 0.01353
  • 0.0005935
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0.0006973
  • 0.001899
  • 0.0002574
  • -0.009891
Depletion potential of the stratospheric ozone layer (ODP)
  • 0.000002103
  • 2.518E-7
  • 1.594E-8
  • 4.392E-7
  • 1.953E-8
  • 0
  • 0
  • 3.873E-8
  • 1.108E-8
  • 9.816E-9
  • -0.03389
Water (user) deprivation potential (WDP)
  • 1.364E+4
  • 13
  • 1.528
  • 1506
  • 66.97
  • 0
  • 0
  • 2.444
  • 1.802
  • 1.748
  • -19.29

IndicatorUnit Production
A1-A3
Transport
A4
Installation
A5
Maintenance
B2
Repair
B3
Replacement
B4
De-construction
C1
Transport
C2
Waste processing
C3
Disposal
C4
Recycling Potential
D
1This impact category deals mainly with the eventual impact of low dose ionizing radiation on human health of the nuclear fuel cycle. It does not consider effects due to possible nuclear accidents, occupational exposure nor due to radioactive waste disposal in underground facilities. Potential ionizing radiation from the soil, from radon and from some construction materials is also not measured by this indicator.
2The results of this environmental impact indicator shall be used with care as the uncertainties on these results are high or as there is limited experiences with the indicator.
Potential Human exposure efficiency relative to U235 (IRP) 1
  • 1.146
  • 0.07407
  • 0.004461
  • 0.8896
  • 0.04033
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0.0112
  • 0.001869
  • 0.002951
  • -0.03813
Potential incidence of disease due to PM emissions (PM) 2
  • 0.000001648
  • 9.592E-8
  • 6.491E-9
  • 1.141E-7
  • 4.749E-9
  • 0
  • 0
  • 1.223E-8
  • 1.335E-8
  • 4.099E-9
  • -3.341E-7
Potential Soil quality index (SQP) 2
  • 273.7
  • 19.44
  • 0.7264
  • 25.32
  • 1.131
  • 0
  • 0
  • 1.766
  • 0.1411
  • 1.607
  • -45.26
Potential Comparative Toxic Unit for humans - non-cancer effects (HTP-nc) 2
  • 7.395E-7
  • 1.199E-8
  • 3.164E-9
  • 8.809E-8
  • 3.369E-9
  • 0
  • 0
  • 2.038E-9
  • 9.397E-9
  • 5.13E-10
  • 9.263E-8
Potential Comparative Toxic Unit for humans - cancer effects (HTP-c) 2
  • 9.891E-8
  • 0
  • 7E-11
  • 2.793E-9
  • 9.7E-11
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 4.15E-10
  • 1.7E-11
  • -6.565E-9
Potential Comparative Toxic Unit for ecosystems (ETP-fw) 2
  • 1122
  • 12.4
  • 1.38
  • 86.63
  • 3.84
  • 0
  • 0
  • 1.887
  • 4.665
  • 0.477
  • -105.2