Close Go back Collapse all sections
Process Data set: RH Logic 300 (en) en

Key Data Set Information
Location SE
Geographical representativeness description Worldwide. A4 stage transportation from factory to market, is assumed to be 1.000 km. See table on page 6 for further detail.
Reference year 2024
Name
RH Logic 300
Technical purpose of product or process The RH Logic 300 family offers a range of ergonomic office chairs with medium backs, each designed to provide optimal comfort and support. Standard features include castors for soft floors and a base in silver aluminum. These chairs can be customized with various options and accessories to suit individual preferences. All models feature a frictionless tilt mechanism that is infinitely adjustable and can be locked into the desired position. This encourages active seating, with the option to work with the tilt open. Additionally, the backrest angle is separately adjustable to provide support in any position. The RH Logic 300 Comfort variant includes extra padding for improved ventilation, while the RH Logic 300 Elegance is equipped with an upholstered back shell for added style and comfort. The RH Logic 300 Elite model is designed for 24/7 use and features 20 mm extra foam in the seat and back pad for enhanced comfort during extended periods of sitting. Adjustment controls are conveniently located and easy to understand, ensuring optimal ergonomic support while seated. The model studied in this declaration is the RH Logic 300 (3340), including packaging. The model declared does not include any options or accessories. The key environmental indicators for the other models of the family, and applicable options of the product collection are presented in a table on page 12 of this declaration
Classification
Class name : Hierarchy level
  • EPDNorge: Furniture / Soft seating
General comment on data set Data quality: Specific data for the product composition are provided by the manufacturer. They represent the production of the declared product and were collected for EPD development in the year of study. Background data is based on registered EPDs according to EN 15804, Ostfold Research databases, ecoinvent and other LCA databases. The data quality of the raw materials in A1 is presented in the table below. Allocation: The allocation is made in accordance with the provisions of EN 15804. Incoming energy and water and waste production in-house is allocated equally among all products through mass allocation. Effects of primary production of recycled materials is allocated to the main product in which the material was used. The recycling process and transportation of the material is allocated to this analysis. Cut-off criteria: All major raw materials and all the essential energy is included. The production processes for raw materials and energy flows with very small amounts (less than 1%) are not included. These cut-off criteria do not apply for hazardous materials and substances.
Copyright Yes
Owner of data set
Quantitative reference
Reference flow(s)
Biogenic carbon content
  • Carbon content (biogenic): 0.0 kg
  • Carbon content (biogenic) - packaging: 1.871219951227 kg
Time representativeness
Data set valid until 2029
Time representativeness description 2024-10-04 - 2029-10-04
Technological representativeness

Indicators of life cycle

IndicatorDirectionUnit Production
A1-A3
Transport
A4
Installation
A5
Maintenance
B2
Repair
B3
Replacement
B4
De-construction
C1
Transport
C2
Waste processing
C3
Disposal
C4
Recycling Potential
D
Input
  • 172.2
  • 0.4513
  • 0.01567
  • 12.24
  • 1.984
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0.08966
  • 0.1145
  • 0.05284
  • -90.11
Input
  • 31.9
  • 0
  • -31.9
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
Input
  • 204.1
  • 0.4513
  • -31.88
  • 12.24
  • 1.984
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0.08966
  • 0.1145
  • 0.05284
  • -90.11
Input
  • 788.3
  • 35.88
  • 0.9388
  • 71.6
  • 2.049
  • 0
  • 0
  • 6.264
  • 3.449
  • 2.677
  • -46.77
Input
  • 233.8
  • 0
  • -3.143
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • -230.7
  • 0
  • 0
Input
  • 1022
  • 35.88
  • -2.204
  • 71.6
  • 2.049
  • 0
  • 0
  • 6.264
  • -227.2
  • 2.677
  • -46.77
Input
  • 12.59
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
Input
  • 1.717
  • 0.01579
  • 0.0005154
  • 0.7763
  • 0.02004
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0.003208
  • 0.002705
  • 0.001392
  • 0.09302
Input
  • 6.6
  • 0.05291
  • 0.002101
  • 0.7361
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0.01147
  • 0
  • 0.07709
  • -1.878
Input
  • 0.8355
  • 0.004083
  • 0.0004443
  • 11.78
  • 0.009027
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0.0006698
  • 0.009813
  • 0.002414
  • -0.124
Output
  • 0.8133
  • 0.001963
  • 0
  • 0.01324
  • 0.0001891
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0.000323
  • 0
  • 10.3
  • -0.01385
Output
  • 10.97
  • 3.118
  • 4.115
  • 0.8506
  • 0.01253
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0.3046
  • 0.1673
  • 0.1776
  • -1.733
Output
  • 0.005046
  • 0.000245
  • 0
  • 0.0004326
  • 0.00002114
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0.00004267
  • 0
  • 0.0000165
  • -0.00009484
Output
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
Output
  • 0.5317
  • 0
  • 3.797
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 3.752
  • 0
  • 0
Output
  • 0.4253
  • 0
  • 0.001547
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 21.23
  • 0
  • 0
Output
  • 0.2816
  • 0
  • 0.2312
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 11.25
  • 0
  • 0
Output
  • 4.261
  • 0
  • 3.497
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 170.2
  • 0
  • 0

IndicatorUnit Production
A1-A3
Transport
A4
Installation
A5
Maintenance
B2
Repair
B3
Replacement
B4
De-construction
C1
Transport
C2
Waste processing
C3
Disposal
C4
Recycling Potential
D
Abiotic depletion potential - fossil resources (ADPF)
  • 921.6
  • 35.88
  • 0.9388
  • 71.48
  • 2.018
  • 0
  • 0
  • 6.263
  • 3.427
  • 2.676
  • -46.78
Abiotic depletion potential - non-fossil resources (ADPE)
  • 0.01476
  • 0.00003936
  • 0.000001622
  • 0.0001139
  • 0.000001161
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0.00001144
  • 0.000001807
  • 0.000002011
  • -0.00006082
Acidification potential, Accumulated Exceedance (AP)
  • 0.3111
  • 0.007112
  • 0.0003168
  • 0.02391
  • 0.0003444
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0.00119
  • 0.006106
  • 0.0008332
  • -0.02699
Global Warming Potential - biogenic (GWP-biogenic)
  • -6.393
  • 0.0009461
  • 6.861
  • 0.02725
  • 0.001365
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0.0001715
  • 0.5005
  • 0.00009169
  • -0.006389
Global Warming Potential - fossil fuels (GWP-fossil)
  • 69.06
  • 2.209
  • 0.07124
  • 4.12
  • 0.07468
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0.4142
  • 17.97
  • 0.1222
  • -4.58
Global Warming Potential - total (GWP-total)
  • 62.75
  • 2.21
  • 6.932
  • 4.159
  • 0.08014
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0.4146
  • 18.47
  • 0.1223
  • -4.632
Global Warming Potential - land use and land use change (GWP-luluc)
  • 0.08705
  • 0.000673
  • 0.00002207
  • 0.01255
  • 0.004091
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0.0001474
  • 0.00006707
  • 0.00003559
  • -0.0459
  • 71.54
  • 2.21
  • 0.07126
  • 4.2
  • 0.1086
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0.4145
  • 18.34
  • 0.1246
  • -6.09
Eutrophication potential - freshwater (EP-freshwater)
  • 0.002513
  • 0.00001757
  • 5.488E-7
  • 0.0003279
  • 0.00000494
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0.000003309
  • 0.000004766
  • 0.000001249
  • -0.0002947
Eutrophication potential - marine (EP-marine)
  • 0.06407
  • 0.001557
  • 0.000109
  • 0.003794
  • 0.00005441
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0.0002356
  • 0.003168
  • 0.0002957
  • -0.006215
Eutrophication potential - terrestrial (EP-terrestrial)
  • 0.6604
  • 0.01737
  • 0.001134
  • 0.04426
  • 0.0007306
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0.002635
  • 0.03172
  • 0.003274
  • -0.06546
Photochemical Ozone Creation Potential (POCP)
  • 0.2084
  • 0.006821
  • 0.0003272
  • 0.01383
  • 0.0001712
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0.001009
  • 0.007677
  • 0.0009415
  • -0.02478
Depletion potential of the stratospheric ozone layer (ODP)
  • 0.000003325
  • 5.326E-7
  • 1.415E-8
  • 3.674E-7
  • 8.08E-9
  • 0
  • 0
  • 9.383E-8
  • 4.129E-8
  • 3.604E-8
  • -0.07037
Water (user) deprivation potential (WDP)
  • 1.02E+4
  • 27.51
  • 1.245
  • 1457
  • 156
  • 0
  • 0
  • 6.058
  • 8.602
  • 5.95
  • -355.6

IndicatorUnit Production
A1-A3
Transport
A4
Installation
A5
Maintenance
B2
Repair
B3
Replacement
B4
De-construction
C1
Transport
C2
Waste processing
C3
Disposal
C4
Recycling Potential
D
1This impact category deals mainly with the eventual impact of low dose ionizing radiation on human health of the nuclear fuel cycle. It does not consider effects due to possible nuclear accidents, occupational exposure nor due to radioactive waste disposal in underground facilities. Potential ionizing radiation from the soil, from radon and from some construction materials is also not measured by this indicator.
2The results of this environmental impact indicator shall be used with care as the uncertainties on these results are high or as there is limited experiences with the indicator.
Potential Human exposure efficiency relative to U235 (IRP) 1
  • 2.486
  • 0.1568
  • 0.004022
  • 0.5418
  • 0.04602
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0.02738
  • 0.006411
  • 0.01079
  • -0.1102
Potential incidence of disease due to PM emissions (PM) 2
  • 0.000003899
  • 2.029E-7
  • 4.697E-9
  • 1.991E-7
  • 1.825E-9
  • 0
  • 0
  • 2.536E-8
  • 4.351E-8
  • 1.506E-8
  • -7.744E-7
Potential Soil quality index (SQP) 2
  • 436.4
  • 41.13
  • 0.6558
  • 21.37
  • 1.52
  • 0
  • 0
  • 4.381
  • 0.4833
  • 5.859
  • -94.32
Potential Comparative Toxic Unit for humans - non-cancer effects (HTP-nc) 2
  • 0.000001141
  • 2.536E-8
  • 1.555E-9
  • 2.486E-7
  • 1.55E-9
  • 0
  • 0
  • 5.072E-9
  • 2.858E-8
  • 1.727E-9
  • 2.263E-7
Potential Comparative Toxic Unit for humans - cancer effects (HTP-c) 2
  • 9.878E-8
  • 0
  • 3.6E-11
  • 1.117E-8
  • 5.9E-11
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 1.153E-9
  • 6E-11
  • -1.74E-8
Potential Comparative Toxic Unit for ecosystems (ETP-fw) 2
  • 1989
  • 26.23
  • 1.243
  • 77.92
  • 2.526
  • 0
  • 0
  • 4.643
  • 39.2
  • 1.679
  • -252.5