Close Go back Collapse all sections
Process Data set: Savo Joi (en) en

Key Data Set Information
Location SE
Geographical representativeness description Scandinavia
Reference year 2025
Name
Savo Joi
Technical purpose of product or process The Joi stool offers an ergonomic alternative to traditional office chairs, designed to promote movement and variety in your daily sitting routine. This minimalist office stool features a clean, streamlined design that fits seamlessly into modern workspaces. Available in two configurations, you can choose the standard model with a supportive footrest or opt for the advanced version featuring a footplate and innovative Joystick function. The Joystick base creates an active sitting experience by engaging your balance while allowing complete 360-degree movement freedom. The design eliminates the need for complex adjustments, making it a versatile seating solution that naturally accommodates different users and body types. This flexibility makes the Joi stool particularly well-suited for shared workspaces and dynamic office environments where adaptability is essential. The model analyzed in detail in this declaration is Savo Joi - high, with polyester fabric including packaging. Key environmental indicators for other models and options of the Joi family are presented in the table under the heading "Variants and Options"
Classification
Class name : Hierarchy level
  • EPDNorge: Furniture / Soft seating
General comment on data set Data quality: Specific data for the product composition are provided by the manufacturer. They represent the production of the declared product and were collected for EPD development in the year of study. Background data is based on registered EPDs according to EN 15804, Ostfold Research databases, ecoinvent and other LCA databases. The data quality of the raw materials in A1 is presented in the table below. Allocation: The allocation is made in accordance with the provisions of EN 15804. Incoming energy and water and waste production in-house is allocated equally among all products through mass allocation. Effects of primary production of recycled materials is allocated to the main product in which the material was used. The recycling process and transportation of the material is allocated to this analysis. Cut-off criteria: All major raw materials and all the essential energy is included. The production processes for raw materials and energy flows with very small amounts (less than 1%) are not included. These cut-off criteria do not apply for hazardous materials and substances.
Copyright Yes
Owner of data set
Quantitative reference
Reference flow(s)
  • - 1.0 * 1.0 Stück (Number of pieces)
Biogenic carbon content
  • Carbon content (biogenic): 1.048737373804 kg
  • Carbon content (biogenic) - packaging: 0.5555555556 kg
Time representativeness
Data set valid until 2030
Time representativeness description 2025-10-10 - 2030-10-10
Technological representativeness
Technology description including background system Certifications: Swedish Möbelfakta

Indicators of life cycle

IndicatorDirectionUnit Production
A1-A3
 Transport
A4
 Installation
A5
 Maintenance
B2
 Repair
B3
 Replacement
B4
 De-construction
C1
 Transport
C2
 Waste processing
C3
 Disposal
C4
 Recycling Potential
D
Input
  • 122.6
  • 0.1048
  • 0.004471
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0.0297
  • 0.05032
  • 0.01873
  • -22.65
Input
  • 28.04
  • 0
  • -9.84
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • -18.2
  • 0
  • 0
Input
  • 150.6
  • 0.1048
  • -9.836
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0.0297
  • -18.15
  • 0.01873
  • -22.65
Input
  • 464.5
  • 7.428
  • 0.2716
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 2.105
  • 1.231
  • 0.962
  • -15.73
Input
  • 24.89
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • -25.08
  • 0
  • 0
Input
  • 489.4
  • 7.428
  • 0.2716
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 2.105
  • -23.85
  • 0.962
  • -15.73
Input
  • 1.964
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
Input
  • 0.383
  • 0.003751
  • 0.0001483
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0.001063
  • 0.001155
  • 0.0004939
  • 0.0487
Input
  • 0.4616
  • 0.01339
  • 0.0006113
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0.003795
  • 0
  • 0.03111
  • 0.2443
Input
  • 0.519
  • 0.0007822
  • 0.0001281
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0.0002216
  • 0.003699
  • 0.0008674
  • -0.02914
Output
  • 0.3657
  • 0.0003788
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0.0001073
  • 0
  • 3.737
  • -0.007719
Output
  • 8.815
  • 0.355
  • 1.2
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0.1006
  • 0.268
  • 0.06341
  • -0.6769
Output
  • 0.002375
  • 0.00005064
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0.00001435
  • 0
  • 0.000005971
  • -0.00001434
Output
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
Output
  • 0.4682
  • 0
  • 1.116
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 1.703
  • 0
  • 0
Output
  • 0.4705
  • 0
  • 0.08389
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 8.66
  • 0
  • 0
Output
  • 0.3009
  • 0
  • 0.06864
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 2.787
  • 0
  • 0
Output
  • 4.552
  • 0
  • 1.038
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 42.17
  • 0
  • 0

IndicatorUnit Production
A1-A3
 Transport
A4
 Installation
A5
 Maintenance
B2
 Repair
B3
 Replacement
B4
 De-construction
C1
 Transport
C2
 Waste processing
C3
 Disposal
C4
 Recycling Potential
D
Abiotic depletion potential - fossil resources (ADPF)
  • 481.5
  • 7.427
  • 0.2716
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 2.104
  • 1.203
  • 0.9619
  • -15.74
Abiotic depletion potential - non-fossil resources (ADPE)
  • 0.003076
  • 0.00001334
  • 4.725E-7
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0.00000378
  • 7.613E-7
  • 7.234E-7
  • -0.00002752
Acidification potential, Accumulated Exceedance (AP)
  • 0.167
  • 0.002013
  • 0.00009192
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0.0005705
  • 0.001912
  • 0.0002989
  • -0.009244
Global Warming Potential - biogenic (GWP-biogenic)
  • -5.37
  • 0.0002008
  • 2.037
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0.0000569
  • 3.846
  • 0.00003193
  • -0.001308
Global Warming Potential - fossil fuels (GWP-fossil)
  • 31.14
  • 0.4926
  • 0.01941
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0.1396
  • 2.827
  • 0.04346
  • -1.698
Global Warming Potential - total (GWP-total)
  • 25.87
  • 0.4929
  • 2.056
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0.1397
  • 6.673
  • 0.04351
  • -1.709
Global Warming Potential - land use and land use change (GWP-luluc)
  • 0.1066
  • 0.0001722
  • 0.00000642
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0.00004878
  • 0.00003265
  • 0.00001276
  • -0.009096
  • 31.7
  • 0.4929
  • 0.01942
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0.1397
  • 2.826
  • 0.04423
  • -1.705
Eutrophication potential - freshwater (EP-freshwater)
  • 0.001919
  • 0.000003868
  • 1.594E-7
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0.000001096
  • 0.000002227
  • 4.421E-7
  • -0.0001112
Eutrophication potential - marine (EP-marine)
  • 0.03287
  • 0.0005971
  • 0.0000304
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0.0001692
  • 0.000973
  • 0.0001062
  • -0.002155
Eutrophication potential - terrestrial (EP-terrestrial)
  • 0.3569
  • 0.006604
  • 0.0003291
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0.001871
  • 0.00966
  • 0.001176
  • -0.02242
Photochemical Ozone Creation Potential (POCP)
  • 0.1202
  • 0.002022
  • 0.00009461
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0.0005729
  • 0.00236
  • 0.0003381
  • -0.009252
Depletion potential of the stratospheric ozone layer (ODP)
  • 0.000002819
  • 1.123E-7
  • 4.098E-9
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 3.182E-8
  • 1.695E-8
  • 1.297E-8
  • -0.01786
Water (user) deprivation potential (WDP)
  • 8013
  • 7.085
  • 0.3442
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 2.007
  • 1.963
  • 2.083
  • 31.71

IndicatorUnit Production
A1-A3
 Transport
A4
 Installation
A5
 Maintenance
B2
 Repair
B3
 Replacement
B4
 De-construction
C1
 Transport
C2
 Waste processing
C3
 Disposal
C4
 Recycling Potential
D
1This impact category deals mainly with the eventual impact of low dose ionizing radiation on human health of the nuclear fuel cycle. It does not consider effects due to possible nuclear accidents, occupational exposure nor due to radioactive waste disposal in underground facilities. Potential ionizing radiation from the soil, from radon and from some construction materials is also not measured by this indicator.
2The results of this environmental impact indicator shall be used with care as the uncertainties on these results are high or as there is limited experiences with the indicator.
Potential Human exposure efficiency relative to U235 (IRP) 1
  • 3.563
  • 0.03247
  • 0.001162
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0.009199
  • 0.002628
  • 0.003868
  • -0.01718
Potential incidence of disease due to PM emissions (PM) 2
  • 0.000002265
  • 3.546E-8
  • 1.356E-9
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 1.005E-8
  • 1.744E-8
  • 5.417E-9
  • -2.43E-7
Potential Soil quality index (SQP) 2
  • 551.6
  • 5.121
  • 0.1822
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 1.451
  • 0.1918
  • 2.104
  • -24.35
Potential Comparative Toxic Unit for humans - non-cancer effects (HTP-nc) 2
  • 0.000001145
  • 5.91E-9
  • 4.55E-10
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 1.675E-9
  • 1.048E-8
  • 6.09E-10
  • 1.337E-7
Potential Comparative Toxic Unit for humans - cancer effects (HTP-c) 2
  • 1.435E-7
  • 0
  • 1.1E-11
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 4.62E-10
  • 2.2E-11
  • -7.341E-9
Potential Comparative Toxic Unit for ecosystems (ETP-fw) 2
  • 1.21E+3
  • 5.47
  • 0.3622
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 1.55
  • 11.27
  • 0.5969
  • -100.1