Close Go back Collapse all sections
Process Data set: Optima TS0101, Outward opening, Topguided window, Wood with 2-layer insulated glass unit. (en) en

Key Data Set Information
Geographical representativeness description We proudly sell to, and care for customers across Europe. Scenarios beyond cradle-to-gate are based on the situation in the Danish market.
Reference year 2025
Name
Optima TS0101, Outward opening, Topguided window, Wood with 2-layer insulated glass unit.
Technical purpose of product or process Window with outward opening sash for use in exterior walls of domestic and commercial buildings Wood with 2-layer insulated glass unit
Classification
Class name : Hierarchy level
  • EPDNorge: Construction / Doors and windows
General comment on data set Data quality: Specific data for the product composition are provided by the manufacturer. The data represent the production of the declared product and were collected for EPD development in the year of study. Background data is based on EPDs according to EN 15804 and different LCA databases. The data quality of the raw materials in A1 is presented in the table below. Allocation: The allocation is made in accordance with the provisions of EN 15804. Effects of primary production of recycled materials is allocated to the main product in which the material was used. The recycling process and transportation of the material is allocated to this analysis. The PCR specific background data follow the allocation rules in the Ecoinvent v3.7.1 Cut-off database version. The allocation of water, energy and waste flows within the production facilities for windows and doors follows unit-based allocation adjusted with a point system to different product groups or products. This score system is regulated by a factor which increases with the resource intensity of each product. The unit-based allocation is adjusted by the weight of the product, excluding the weight of glass. Cut-off criteria: All major raw materials and all the essential energy is included. The production processes for raw materials and energy flows with very small amounts (less than 1%) are not included. These cut-off criteria do not apply for hazardous materials and substances.
Copyright Yes
Owner of data set
Quantitative reference
Reference flow(s)
Biogenic carbon content
  • Carbon content (biogenic): 11.519415 kg
  • Carbon content (biogenic) - packaging: 1.653666668 kg
Time representativeness
Data set valid until 2030
Time representativeness description 2025-02-06 - 2030-02-06
Technological representativeness
Technology description including background system Glazing composition: 4-X-4 configuration. Frame profile dimensions: 44 mm. x 116 mm., providing structural stability and improved thermal performance. Surface treatment: Factory-applied water-based paint for increased resistance to moisture and weathering, ensuring longevity and low maintenance.

Indicators of life cycle

IndicatorDirectionUnit Production
A1-A3
 Transport
A4
 Installation
A5
 Maintenance
B2
 Replacement
B4
 De-construction
C1
 Transport
C2
 Waste processing
C3
 Disposal
C4
 Recycling Potential
D
Input
  • 621.4
  • 0.3597
  • 0.001299
  • 9.406
  • 208
  • 1.83
  • 0
  • 6.781
  • 0.08569
  • -168.2
Input
  • 301.3
  • 0
  • -55.52
  • 0
  • -1.359E-9
  • 0
  • 0
  • -245.8
  • 0
  • 0
Input
  • 922.2
  • 0.3597
  • -55.52
  • 9.406
  • 207.9
  • 1.83
  • 0
  • -239
  • 0.08569
  • -168.2
Input
  • 1379
  • 25.13
  • 0.06325
  • 20.87
  • 4.8E+2
  • 13.04
  • 0
  • 32.22
  • 5.297
  • -107
Input
  • 40.01
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 1.675E-9
  • 0
  • 0
  • -40.01
  • 0
  • 0
Input
  • 1419
  • 25.13
  • 0.06325
  • 20.87
  • 479.9
  • 13.04
  • 0
  • -7.791
  • 5.297
  • -107
Input
  • 0.1649
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0.05442
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
Input
  • 6.578
  • 0.01287
  • 0.0000379
  • 0.03307
  • 2.232
  • 0.03041
  • 0
  • 0.1409
  • 0.001802
  • -0.001836
Input
  • 0.5447
  • 0.04601
  • 0.0004317
  • 0.02512
  • 0.2468
  • 0.01802
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0.1386
  • -7.26
Input
  • 1.501
  • 0.002687
  • 0.00004604
  • 0.1134
  • 0.5033
  • 0.003938
  • 0
  • 0.0119
  • 0.00575
  • -0.3216
Output
  • 48.14
  • 0.001296
  • 0
  • 0.09909
  • 15.96
  • 0.0008448
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0.2385
  • 0.0194
Output
  • 24.23
  • 1.222
  • 0.2
  • 0.3039
  • 15.76
  • 0.02368
  • 0
  • 0
  • 22.07
  • -2.667
Output
  • 0.0216
  • 0.0001712
  • 0
  • 0.00009912
  • 0.007218
  • 0.00009343
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0.000003221
  • -0.0004286
Output
  • 0
  • 0
  • 3.8
  • 0
  • 1.254
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
Output
  • 9.157
  • 0
  • 0.000004693
  • 0
  • 6.436
  • 0
  • 0
  • 10.35
  • 0.0001147
  • 0
Output
  • 0.784
  • 0
  • 0.1984
  • 0
  • 8.573
  • 0
  • 0
  • 25
  • 0.000002373
  • 0
Output
  • 0.4931
  • 0
  • 0.138
  • 0
  • 6.118
  • 0
  • 0
  • 17.91
  • 0.0001799
  • 0
Output
  • 7.461
  • 0
  • 2.088
  • 0
  • 92.56
  • 0
  • 0
  • 270.9
  • 0.002722
  • 0

IndicatorUnit Production
A1-A3
 Transport
A4
 Installation
A5
 Maintenance
B2
 Replacement
B4
 De-construction
C1
 Transport
C2
 Waste processing
C3
 Disposal
C4
 Recycling Potential
D
Abiotic depletion potential - fossil resources (ADPF)
  • 1397
  • 25.13
  • 0.06324
  • 19.64
  • 485.9
  • 12.94
  • 0
  • 32.22
  • 5.296
  • -107
Abiotic depletion potential - non-fossil resources (ADPE)
  • 0.01196
  • 0.00004591
  • 8.728E-8
  • 0.00006107
  • 0.003966
  • 0.000002447
  • 0
  • 0.000008046
  • 0.000002355
  • -0.00002273
Acidification potential, Accumulated Exceedance (AP)
  • 0.7835
  • 0.004776
  • 0.00004327
  • 0.0102
  • 0.2672
  • 0.008569
  • 0
  • 0.01088
  • 0.001936
  • -0.05845
Global Warming Potential - biogenic (GWP-biogenic)
  • -47.53
  • 0.0006879
  • 6.064
  • 0.1286
  • 0.3012
  • 0.00131
  • 0
  • 42.26
  • 0.1101
  • -0.03143
Global Warming Potential - fossil fuels (GWP-fossil)
  • 94.18
  • 1.662
  • 0.005382
  • 0.9243
  • 35.36
  • 0.9248
  • 0
  • 10.13
  • 0.2549
  • -8.537
Global Warming Potential - total (GWP-total)
  • 50.03
  • 1.663
  • 6.069
  • 1.986
  • 36.78
  • 0.9269
  • 0
  • 52.39
  • 0.3651
  • -8.738
Global Warming Potential - land use and land use change (GWP-luluc)
  • 3.267
  • 0.0005915
  • 0.00000138
  • 0.9335
  • 1.079
  • 0.0007836
  • 0
  • 0.0007938
  • 0.00006466
  • -0.1692
  • 100.2
  • 1.663
  • 0.005383
  • 1.977
  • 37.43
  • 1.031
  • 0
  • 10.15
  • 0.3658
  • -8.9
Eutrophication potential - freshwater (EP-freshwater)
  • 0.05124
  • 0.00001328
  • 6.45E-8
  • 0.004914
  • 0.01692
  • 0.00001022
  • 0
  • 0.00001781
  • 0.000003009
  • -0.0004311
Eutrophication potential - marine (EP-marine)
  • 0.1256
  • 0.0009451
  • 0.00001857
  • 0.01066
  • 0.04348
  • 0.001203
  • 0
  • 0.003194
  • 0.0007374
  • -0.01037
Eutrophication potential - terrestrial (EP-terrestrial)
  • 1.496
  • 0.01057
  • 0.0001989
  • 0.03058
  • 0.5158
  • 0.01339
  • 0
  • 0.03518
  • 0.007422
  • -0.1125
Photochemical Ozone Creation Potential (POCP)
  • 0.3881
  • 0.004049
  • 0.00005112
  • 0.009865
  • 0.1348
  • 0.004118
  • 0
  • 0.01004
  • 0.002159
  • -0.0365
Depletion potential of the stratospheric ozone layer (ODP)
  • 0.00001132
  • 3.765E-7
  • 8.6E-10
  • 2.578E-7
  • 0.000004109
  • 1.746E-7
  • 0
  • 5.026E-7
  • 7.262E-8
  • -0.1153
Water (user) deprivation potential (WDP)
  • 7062
  • 24.3
  • 0.09735
  • 73.45
  • 2425
  • 119.4
  • 0
  • 134.8
  • 7.902
  • -3.68E+3

IndicatorUnit Production
A1-A3
 Transport
A4
 Installation
A5
 Maintenance
B2
 Replacement
B4
 De-construction
C1
 Transport
C2
 Waste processing
C3
 Disposal
C4
 Recycling Potential
D
1This impact category deals mainly with the eventual impact of low dose ionizing radiation on human health of the nuclear fuel cycle. It does not consider effects due to possible nuclear accidents, occupational exposure nor due to radioactive waste disposal in underground facilities. Potential ionizing radiation from the soil, from radon and from some construction materials is also not measured by this indicator.
2The results of this environmental impact indicator shall be used with care as the uncertainties on these results are high or as there is limited experiences with the indicator.
Potential Human exposure efficiency relative to U235 (IRP) 1
  • 2.526
  • 0.1098
  • 0.0002293
  • 0.07829
  • 0.9557
  • 0.09138
  • 0
  • 0.1471
  • 0.02127
  • -0.474
Potential incidence of disease due to PM emissions (PM) 2
  • 0.000003777
  • 1.017E-7
  • 5.28E-10
  • 1.276E-7
  • 0.000001383
  • 6.898E-8
  • 0
  • 2.04E-7
  • 3.766E-8
  • -0.000001289
Potential Soil quality index (SQP) 2
  • 779.6
  • 17.58
  • 0.03545
  • 39.72
  • 275.4
  • 7.288
  • 0
  • 15.83
  • 14.38
  • -152.6
Potential Comparative Toxic Unit for humans - non-cancer effects (HTP-nc) 2
  • 0.0000025
  • 2.035E-8
  • 3.84E-10
  • 5.211E-8
  • 8.595E-7
  • 5.673E-9
  • 0
  • 7.486E-8
  • 3.507E-9
  • -1.971E-7
Potential Comparative Toxic Unit for humans - cancer effects (HTP-c) 2
  • 9.314E-8
  • 0
  • 8E-12
  • 2.18E-9
  • 3.709E-8
  • 1.216E-9
  • 0
  • 1.786E-8
  • 1.63E-10
  • -2.201E-8
Potential Comparative Toxic Unit for ecosystems (ETP-fw) 2
  • 1735
  • 18.63
  • 0.07201
  • 108.7
  • 604.2
  • 10.35
  • 0
  • 40.6
  • 26.09
  • -266.4