Close Go back Collapse all sections
Process Data set: Envistar Top 10 with thermal wheel, controls and ThermoCooler (en) en

Key Data Set Information
Location SE
Geographical representativeness description Europe
Reference year 2025
Name
Envistar Top 10 with thermal wheel, controls and ThermoCooler
Technical purpose of product or process Air Handling Unit (AHU) for non residential building. Envistar Top ThermoCooler air handling unit for non residential buildings. Bi-directional including rotating heat exchanger and damper with integrated cooling, heating and controls.
Classification
Class name : Hierarchy level
  • EPDNorge: Construction / Ventilation components
General comment on data set Data quality: Specific data for the product composition are provided by the manufacturer. The data represent the production of the declared product and were collected for EPD development in the year of study. Background data is based on EPDs according to EN 15804 and different LCA databases. The data quality of the raw materials in A1 is presented in the table below. Allocation: The allocation is made in accordance with the provisions of EN 15804. Energy, water and waste production in-house is allocated equally among all products through mass allocation. Effects of primary production of recycled materials is allocated to the main product in which the material was used. The recycling process and transportation of the material is allocated to this analysis. Cut-off criteria: All major raw materials and all the essential energy is included. The production processes for raw materials and energy flows with very small amounts (less than 1%) are not included. These cut-off criteria do not apply for hazardous materials and substances.
Copyright Yes
Owner of data set
Quantitative reference
Reference flow(s)
Biogenic carbon content
  • Carbon content (biogenic): 0.0 kg
  • Carbon content (biogenic) - packaging: 0.0 kg
Time representativeness
Data set valid until 2030
Time representativeness description 2025-04-09 - 2030-04-09
Technological representativeness
Technology description including background system According to printout from IVP Designer (selection program).

Indicators of life cycle

IndicatorDirectionUnit Production
A1-A3
Transport
A4
De-construction
C1
Transport
C2
Waste processing
C3
Disposal
C4
Recycling Potential
D
Input
  • 8.5E+3
  • 4.902
  • 0
  • 1.578
  • 50.54
  • 10.16
  • -3344
Input
  • 2.931
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
Input
  • 8503
  • 4.902
  • 0
  • 1.578
  • 50.54
  • 10.16
  • -3344
Input
  • 3.844E+4
  • 367.4
  • 0
  • 110.3
  • 284.4
  • 43.12
  • -1.19E+4
Input
  • 824.4
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • -584.8
  • 0
  • 0
Input
  • 3.925E+4
  • 367.4
  • 0
  • 110.3
  • -300.4
  • 43.12
  • -1.19E+4
Input
  • 213.5
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0.0003703
  • 0.2238
  • 2.548
Input
  • 61.42
  • 0.1733
  • 0
  • 0.05646
  • 1.038
  • 0.04914
  • 7.289
Input
  • 649.2
  • 0.5994
  • 0
  • 0.2019
  • -0.00765
  • 2.172
  • 248.3
Input
  • 63.31
  • 0.0407
  • 0
  • 0.01179
  • 0.3102
  • 0.04137
  • -18.09
Output
  • 25.95
  • 0.01959
  • 0
  • 0.005686
  • 0.004012
  • 11.09
  • 0.4929
Output
  • 898
  • 25.75
  • 0
  • 5.362
  • 44.38
  • 54.33
  • -311.3
Output
  • 0.1551
  • 0.002506
  • 0
  • 0.000751
  • 0.0002015
  • 0.000007549
  • -0.03776
Output
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
Output
  • 91.34
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 448
  • 0.0002586
  • -0.3934
Output
  • 29.79
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 41.52
  • 0.000007565
  • -0.04929
Output
  • 17.56
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 4.027
  • 0.0002341
  • -0.2263
Output
  • 265.7
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 60.92
  • 0.003541
  • -3.424

IndicatorUnit Production
A1-A3
Transport
A4
De-construction
C1
Transport
C2
Waste processing
C3
Disposal
C4
Recycling Potential
D
Abiotic depletion potential - fossil resources (ADPF)
  • 3.927E+4
  • 367.4
  • 0
  • 110.2
  • 283
  • 43.07
  • -1.19E+4
Abiotic depletion potential - non-fossil resources (ADPE)
  • 1.426
  • 0.0005209
  • 0
  • 0.0002014
  • 0.0002658
  • 0.0000209
  • -0.3503
Acidification potential, Accumulated Exceedance (AP)
  • 35.28
  • 0.07151
  • 0
  • 0.02096
  • 0.1045
  • 0.0174
  • -18.21
Global Warming Potential - biogenic (GWP-biogenic)
  • 16.29
  • 0.00985
  • 0
  • 0.003018
  • 0.1531
  • 0.00362
  • -3.505
Global Warming Potential - fossil fuels (GWP-fossil)
  • 3135
  • 23.36
  • 0
  • 7.292
  • 99.23
  • 4.885
  • -1018
Global Warming Potential - total (GWP-total)
  • 3159
  • 23.37
  • 0
  • 7.297
  • 99.41
  • 4.908
  • -1033
Global Warming Potential - land use and land use change (GWP-luluc)
  • 7.708
  • 0.007663
  • 0
  • 0.002595
  • 0.02541
  • 0.01981
  • -12
  • 3157
  • 23.37
  • 0
  • 7.297
  • 85.72
  • 5.008
  • -1114
Eutrophication potential - freshwater (EP-freshwater)
  • 0.3167
  • 0.0001862
  • 0
  • 0.00005826
  • 0.00147
  • 0.0001234
  • -0.1173
Eutrophication potential - marine (EP-marine)
  • 4.149
  • 0.01501
  • 0
  • 0.004146
  • 0.02245
  • 0.004383
  • -1.398
Eutrophication potential - terrestrial (EP-terrestrial)
  • 70.47
  • 0.1676
  • 0
  • 0.04638
  • 0.2506
  • 0.04648
  • -17.21
Photochemical Ozone Creation Potential (POCP)
  • 15.73
  • 0.06517
  • 0
  • 0.01777
  • 0.07027
  • 0.01779
  • -5.63
Depletion potential of the stratospheric ozone layer (ODP)
  • 0.002112
  • 0.000005476
  • 0
  • 0.000001652
  • 0.000007278
  • 3.398E-7
  • -0.07385
Water (user) deprivation potential (WDP)
  • 3.256E+5
  • 314.1
  • 0
  • 106.6
  • 1.49E+3
  • 341.4
  • -3.417E+5

IndicatorUnit Production
A1-A3
Transport
A4
De-construction
C1
Transport
C2
Waste processing
C3
Disposal
C4
Recycling Potential
D
1This impact category deals mainly with the eventual impact of low dose ionizing radiation on human health of the nuclear fuel cycle. It does not consider effects due to possible nuclear accidents, occupational exposure nor due to radioactive waste disposal in underground facilities. Potential ionizing radiation from the soil, from radon and from some construction materials is also not measured by this indicator.
2The results of this environmental impact indicator shall be used with care as the uncertainties on these results are high or as there is limited experiences with the indicator.
Potential Human exposure efficiency relative to U235 (IRP) 1
  • 161.9
  • 1.606
  • 0
  • 0.4819
  • 1.337
  • 0.1341
  • -40.71
Potential incidence of disease due to PM emissions (PM) 2
  • 0.000276
  • 0.000001818
  • 0
  • 4.464E-7
  • 0.000001433
  • 2.705E-7
  • -0.00008877
Potential Soil quality index (SQP) 2
  • 1.435E+4
  • 349
  • 0
  • 77.12
  • 111
  • 119.1
  • -2098
Potential Comparative Toxic Unit for humans - non-cancer effects (HTP-nc) 2
  • 0.0002658
  • 2.763E-7
  • 0
  • 8.928E-8
  • 0.000008297
  • 0.000002404
  • -0.00006352
Potential Comparative Toxic Unit for humans - cancer effects (HTP-c) 2
  • 0.00001279
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 1.927E-7
  • 4.486E-8
  • -0.000003578
Potential Comparative Toxic Unit for ecosystems (ETP-fw) 2
  • 2.702E+5
  • 270.3
  • 0
  • 81.73
  • 1402
  • 3572
  • -1.242E+5