Close Go back Collapse all sections
Process Data set: OFFECCT Bop (en) en

Key Data Set Information
Location PL
Geographical representativeness description Worldwide
Reference year 2024
Name
OFFECCT Bop
Technical purpose of product or process Bop is a series of chairs designed for USF Verftet, an arts arena for music, theater, film and modern art in Bergen, Norway. USF was established in 1993 and is an important actor within arts and culture in Bergen and Norway with the aim of collaborating, strengthening and participating in the development of culture and creativity. Bop lives up to the high standards of comfort, durability and adaptability required of a concert chair, but fits perfectly well in other public interiors as well. Benefits & functions - Can be upholstered both in fabrics or leather. - High comfort and adaptability. - Has armrests. The model studied in detail in this declaration is the OFFECCT Bop chair with armrests and upholstered in the Cura fabric from Gabriel - including packaging. The key environmental indicators are presented separately for the product and packaging on a table page 11 of this declaration.
Classification
Class name : Hierarchy level
  • EPDNorge: Furniture / Soft seating
General comment on data set Data quality: Specific data for the product composition are provided by the manufacturer. They represent the production of the declared product and were collected for EPD development in the year of study. Background data is based on registered EPDs according to EN 15804, Ostfold Research databases, ecoinvent and other LCA databases. The data quality of the raw materials in A1 is presented in the table below. Allocation: The allocation is made in accordance with the provisions of EN 15804. Incoming energy and water and waste production in-house is allocated equally among all products through mass allocation. Effects of primary production of recycled materials is allocated to the main product in which the material was used. The recycling process and transportation of the material is allocated to this analysis. Cut-off criteria: All major raw materials and all the essential energy is included. The production processes for raw materials and energy flows with very small amounts (less than 1%) are not included. These cut-off criteria do not apply for hazardous materials and substances.
Copyright Yes
Owner of data set
Quantitative reference
Reference flow(s)
Biogenic carbon content
  • Carbon content (biogenic): 0.78124999925 kg
  • Carbon content (biogenic) - packaging: 1.673749126618 kg
Time representativeness
Data set valid until 2029
Time representativeness description "2024-06-07" - "2029-06-07"
Technological representativeness
Technology description including background system Seat in laminated wood with cold foam. Quilted Selected Patterns ALFA seat and back, upholstered in fabric or leather. Standard leather Elmo Soft, piquet on the inside and standard on the outside. Legs in white pigmented massive ash.

Indicators of life cycle

IndicatorDirectionUnit Production
A1-A3
Transport
A4
Installation
A5
Maintenance
B2
Repair
B3
Replacement
B4
De-construction
C1
Transport
C2
Waste processing
C3
Disposal
C4
Recycling Potential
D
Input
  • 127.9
  • 0.1876
  • 0.01405
  • 19.88
  • 0.9053
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0.03178
  • 0.4222
  • 0.02356
  • -22.53
Input
  • 50.02
  • 0
  • -25.54
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • -24.48
  • 0
  • 0
Input
  • 177.9
  • 0.1876
  • -25.53
  • 19.88
  • 0.9053
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0.03178
  • -24.06
  • 0.02356
  • -22.53
Input
  • 234.9
  • 14.9
  • 0.8411
  • 108.3
  • 4.876
  • 0
  • 0
  • 2.252
  • 2.99
  • 0.7331
  • -12.89
Input
  • 39.27
  • 0
  • -2.973
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • -36.3
  • 0
  • 0
Input
  • 274.1
  • 14.9
  • -2.132
  • 108.3
  • 4.876
  • 0
  • 0
  • 2.252
  • -33.31
  • 0.7331
  • -12.89
Input
  • 4.303
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
Input
  • 0.4629
  • 0.006561
  • 0.0004619
  • 1.383
  • 0.06265
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0.001138
  • 0.009334
  • 0.0005299
  • 0.03639
Input
  • 0.1079
  • 0.02199
  • 0.001881
  • 0.3697
  • 0.01507
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0.004061
  • 0
  • 0.0247
  • -0.1206
Input
  • 0.2198
  • 0.001697
  • 0.0003981
  • 0.8694
  • 0.00399
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0.0002372
  • 0.004065
  • 0.0007403
  • -0.02857
Output
  • 0.2266
  • 0.0008158
  • 0
  • 0.01871
  • 0.0008389
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0.0001149
  • 0
  • 2.478
  • -0.005952
Output
  • 5.84
  • 1.296
  • 3.685
  • 0.4238
  • 0.01731
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0.1076
  • 0.265
  • 0.08004
  • -0.5383
Output
  • 0.0007475
  • 0.0001017
  • 0
  • 0.0007213
  • 0.00003265
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0.00001536
  • 0
  • 0.000003943
  • -0.00001539
Output
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
Output
  • 0.8328
  • 0
  • 3.399
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 1.258
  • 0
  • 0
Output
  • 0.000006605
  • 0
  • 0.0003719
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 6.857
  • 0
  • 0
Output
  • 0.4604
  • 0
  • 0.2068
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 2.801
  • 0
  • 0
Output
  • 6.966
  • 0
  • 3.128
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 42.38
  • 0
  • 0

IndicatorUnit Production
A1-A3
Transport
A4
Installation
A5
Maintenance
B2
Repair
B3
Replacement
B4
De-construction
C1
Transport
C2
Waste processing
C3
Disposal
C4
Recycling Potential
D
Abiotic depletion potential - fossil resources (ADPF)
  • 273.6
  • 14.9
  • 0.841
  • 108.1
  • 4.869
  • 0
  • 0
  • 2.252
  • 2.98
  • 0.733
  • -12.9
Abiotic depletion potential - non-fossil resources (ADPE)
  • 0.0005892
  • 0.00001636
  • 0.000001453
  • 0.0000434
  • 0.000001689
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0.000004046
  • 0.000002241
  • 5.165E-7
  • -0.00002166
Acidification potential, Accumulated Exceedance (AP)
  • 0.1027
  • 0.004027
  • 0.0002838
  • 0.03219
  • 0.00144
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0.0006106
  • 0.002075
  • 0.000238
  • -0.007564
Global Warming Potential - biogenic (GWP-biogenic)
  • -8.625
  • 0.0003932
  • 6.137
  • 0.0361
  • 0.001618
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0.0000609
  • 3.52
  • 0.00003179
  • -0.001123
Global Warming Potential - fossil fuels (GWP-fossil)
  • 18.99
  • 0.958
  • 0.06403
  • 5.62
  • 0.2516
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0.1494
  • 2.606
  • 0.04832
  • -1.36
Global Warming Potential - total (GWP-total)
  • 10.41
  • 0.9587
  • 6.201
  • 5.668
  • 0.2538
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0.1495
  • 6.126
  • 0.04837
  • -1.37
Global Warming Potential - land use and land use change (GWP-luluc)
  • 0.04164
  • 0.0002797
  • 0.00001977
  • 0.01266
  • 0.0005745
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0.00005221
  • 0.0001475
  • 0.00001039
  • -0.008991
  • 19.02
  • 0.9587
  • 0.06405
  • 5.988
  • 0.2688
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0.1495
  • 3.305
  • 0.04988
  • -1.919
Eutrophication potential - freshwater (EP-freshwater)
  • 0.001095
  • 0.000007306
  • 4.916E-7
  • 0.0005475
  • 0.00002473
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0.000001173
  • 0.00001388
  • 4.814E-7
  • -0.00009041
Eutrophication potential - marine (EP-marine)
  • 0.02426
  • 0.001211
  • 0.00009785
  • 0.004311
  • 0.000191
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0.0001811
  • 0.0008288
  • 0.00008089
  • -0.001809
Eutrophication potential - terrestrial (EP-terrestrial)
  • 0.2494
  • 0.01339
  • 0.001016
  • 0.0522
  • 0.002318
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0.002003
  • 0.008511
  • 0.0009029
  • -0.01888
Photochemical Ozone Creation Potential (POCP)
  • 0.08465
  • 0.004306
  • 0.0002931
  • 0.01353
  • 0.0005935
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0.0006131
  • 0.002146
  • 0.0002584
  • -0.007558
Depletion potential of the stratospheric ozone layer (ODP)
  • 0.000001685
  • 2.214E-7
  • 1.268E-8
  • 4.392E-7
  • 1.953E-8
  • 0
  • 0
  • 3.405E-8
  • 6.882E-8
  • 9.606E-9
  • -0.01796
Water (user) deprivation potential (WDP)
  • 1.311E+4
  • 11.43
  • 1.118
  • 1506
  • 66.97
  • 0
  • 0
  • 2.148
  • 9.871
  • 3.696
  • 13.82

IndicatorUnit Production
A1-A3
Transport
A4
Installation
A5
Maintenance
B2
Repair
B3
Replacement
B4
De-construction
C1
Transport
C2
Waste processing
C3
Disposal
C4
Recycling Potential
D
1This impact category deals mainly with the eventual impact of low dose ionizing radiation on human health of the nuclear fuel cycle. It does not consider effects due to possible nuclear accidents, occupational exposure nor due to radioactive waste disposal in underground facilities. Potential ionizing radiation from the soil, from radon and from some construction materials is also not measured by this indicator.
2The results of this environmental impact indicator shall be used with care as the uncertainties on these results are high or as there is limited experiences with the indicator.
Potential Human exposure efficiency relative to U235 (IRP) 1
  • 0.7465
  • 0.06513
  • 0.003604
  • 0.8896
  • 0.04033
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0.009845
  • 0.01152
  • 0.003085
  • -0.01852
Potential incidence of disease due to PM emissions (PM) 2
  • 0.000001455
  • 8.434E-8
  • 4.209E-9
  • 1.141E-7
  • 4.749E-9
  • 0
  • 0
  • 1.075E-8
  • 2.446E-8
  • 3.882E-9
  • -2.155E-7
Potential Soil quality index (SQP) 2
  • 272.6
  • 17.09
  • 0.5888
  • 25.32
  • 1.131
  • 0
  • 0
  • 1.553
  • 0.983
  • 1.664
  • -24.27
Potential Comparative Toxic Unit for humans - non-cancer effects (HTP-nc) 2
  • 6.423E-7
  • 1.054E-8
  • 1.391E-9
  • 8.809E-8
  • 3.369E-9
  • 0
  • 0
  • 1.792E-9
  • 1.095E-8
  • 9.15E-10
  • 9.8E-8
Potential Comparative Toxic Unit for humans - cancer effects (HTP-c) 2
  • 9.073E-8
  • 0
  • 3.3E-11
  • 2.793E-9
  • 9.7E-11
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 8.31E-10
  • 2.8E-11
  • -5.705E-9
Potential Comparative Toxic Unit for ecosystems (ETP-fw) 2
  • 1111
  • 10.9
  • 1.113
  • 86.63
  • 3.84
  • 0
  • 0
  • 1.659
  • 14.89
  • 0.6587
  • -81.23