Close Go back Collapse all sections
Process Data set: NorDan NTech Villa Tophinged - TW 105/80 (With Aluminium Cladding) (en) en

Key Data Set Information
Location PL
Geographical representativeness description Europe, but scenarios beyond cradle-to-gate are based on the situation in the Norwegian market.
Reference year 2024
Name
NorDan NTech Villa Tophinged - TW 105/80 (With Aluminium Cladding)
Technical purpose of product or process Window with outward opening tophinged sash, for use in exterior walls of domestic and commercial buildings. NorDan NTech Villa Tophinged - TW in size 1230x1480 mm is covered in this EPD. Wooden window with aluminium cladding. Triple glazed unit 4E + 16G + 4 + 16G + E4
Classification
Class name : Hierarchy level
  • EPDNorge: Construction / Doors and windows
General comment on data set Data quality: Specific data for the product composition are provided by the manufacturer. The data represent the production of the declared product and were collected for EPD development in the year of study. Background data is based on EPDs according to EN 15804 and different LCA databases. The data quality of the raw materials in A1 is presented in the table below. Material quantities of the specified product in reference size have been calculated by NorDan's business system. The production data was collected in 2021 and is an average for 2020. Allocation: The allocation is made in accordance with the provisions of EN 15804. Effects of primary production of recycled materials is allocated to the main product in which the material was used. The recycling process and transportation of the material is allocated to this analysis. The PCR specific background data follow the allocation rules in the Ecoinvent v3.7.1 Cut-off database version. The allocation of water, energy and waste flows within the production facilities for windows and doors follows unit-based allocation adjusted with a point system to different product groups or products. This score system is regulated by a factor which increases with the resource intensity of each product. The unit-based allocation is adjusted by the weight of the product, excluding the weight of glass. Cut-off criteria: All major raw materials and all the essential energy is included. The production processes for raw materials and energy flows with very small amounts (less than 1%) are not included. These cut-off criteria do not apply for hazardous materials and substances.
Copyright Yes
Owner of data set
Quantitative reference
Reference flow(s)
Biogenic carbon content
  • Carbon content (biogenic): 11.771701795882 kg
  • Carbon content (biogenic) - packaging: 1.48416583453 kg
Time representativeness
Data set valid until 2029
Time representativeness description 2024-03-22 - 2029-03-22
Technological representativeness
Technology description including background system Outward opening window. Triple glazed, 105 mm frame with 8 mm aluminium clad, 80 mm sash. Uwin 0,82 W/m2K. Certified: BBA - British Board of Agrément, Secured by Design, DVV, RISE P-marked production. The total weight of the product is 67,13 kg. The packaging has an average weight of 3,77 kg. Area of functional unit 1,82 m2. Conversion factor is 0,549 for 1 m2.

Indicators of life cycle

IndicatorDirectionUnit Production
A1-A3
Transport
A4
Installation
A5
Maintenance
B2
Replacement
B4
De-construction
C1
Transport
C2
Waste processing
C3
Disposal
C4
Recycling Potential
D
Input
  • 461
  • 1.627
  • 0.002389
  • 44.74
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0.1027
  • 2.123
  • 0.2144
  • -188.6
Input
  • 360.4
  • 0
  • -49.83
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • -309.9
  • 0
  • 0
Input
  • 821.3
  • 1.627
  • -49.83
  • 44.74
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0.1027
  • -307.8
  • 0.2143
  • -188.6
Input
  • 1593
  • 136.9
  • 0.1099
  • 668
  • 0
  • 0
  • 7.162
  • 14.75
  • 11.49
  • -66.7
Input
  • 110.1
  • 0
  • -5.521
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • -104.6
  • 0
  • 0
Input
  • 1703
  • 136.9
  • -5.411
  • 668
  • 0
  • 0
  • 7.162
  • -89.89
  • 11.49
  • -66.7
Input
  • 0.2825
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0.01468
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
Input
  • 3.19
  • 0.05592
  • 0.00006754
  • 0.04295
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0.003657
  • 0.04421
  • 0.005677
  • 0.003939
Input
  • 2.849
  • 0.179
  • 0.0004803
  • 0.104
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0.01285
  • 0
  • 0.2449
  • -9.359
Input
  • 3.177
  • 0.01436
  • 0.0000649
  • 0.6931
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0.0008105
  • 0.01904
  • 0.01036
  • -0.273
Output
  • 2.612
  • 0.007212
  • 0
  • 47.93
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0.0003862
  • 0
  • 44.92
  • 0.002557
Output
  • 30.05
  • 10.07
  • 0.3595
  • 8.173
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0.4439
  • 41.03
  • 0.4318
  • -1.782
Output
  • 0.005894
  • 0.0009374
  • 0
  • 0.002554
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0.0000487
  • 0
  • 0.00007076
  • -0.0002653
Output
  • 0
  • 0
  • 3.41
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
Output
  • 1.457
  • 0
  • 0.1164
  • 0.2594
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0.7521
  • 0
  • 0
Output
  • 1.859
  • 0
  • 0.1781
  • 0.00009445
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 68.26
  • 0
  • 0
Output
  • 0.2431
  • 0
  • 0.1239
  • 4.104
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 18.9
  • 0
  • 0
Output
  • 3.115
  • 0
  • 1.874
  • 60.06
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 285.9
  • 0
  • 0

IndicatorUnit Production
A1-A3
Transport
A4
Installation
A5
Maintenance
B2
Replacement
B4
De-construction
C1
Transport
C2
Waste processing
C3
Disposal
C4
Recycling Potential
D
Abiotic depletion potential - fossil resources (ADPF)
  • 1719
  • 136.9
  • 0.1099
  • 737.6
  • 0
  • 0
  • 7.162
  • 14.75
  • 11.49
  • -66.71
Abiotic depletion potential - non-fossil resources (ADPE)
  • 0.001193
  • 0.0001465
  • 1.523E-7
  • 0.0007656
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0.00001208
  • 0.000005486
  • 0.000008678
  • -0.00003526
Acidification potential, Accumulated Exceedance (AP)
  • 1.064
  • 0.06875
  • 0.00005442
  • 0.5291
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0.002658
  • 0.01144
  • 0.003553
  • -0.03731
Global Warming Potential - biogenic (GWP-biogenic)
  • -33.92
  • 0.003511
  • 5.441
  • 0.4537
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0.0002002
  • 29.7
  • 0.0003771
  • -0.01517
Global Warming Potential - fossil fuels (GWP-fossil)
  • 138.1
  • 8.763
  • 0.01584
  • 62.29
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0.4665
  • 11.27
  • 0.5042
  • -5.363
Global Warming Potential - total (GWP-total)
  • 104.3
  • 8.769
  • 5.457
  • 63.09
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0.4669
  • 40.96
  • 0.5047
  • -5.491
Global Warming Potential - land use and land use change (GWP-luluc)
  • 0.13
  • 0.003138
  • 0.000002276
  • 0.3461
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0.0001651
  • 0.0003484
  • 0.0001517
  • -0.1128
  • 147
  • 8.769
  • 0.01584
  • 62.83
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0.4669
  • 11.25
  • 0.5072
  • -5.895
Eutrophication potential - freshwater (EP-freshwater)
  • 0.007136
  • 0.00006404
  • 8.464E-8
  • 0.001482
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0.000003839
  • 0.00001569
  • 0.000005035
  • -0.0003331
Eutrophication potential - marine (EP-marine)
  • 0.17
  • 0.0164
  • 0.00002914
  • 0.08913
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0.000951
  • 0.00515
  • 0.001267
  • -0.008466
Eutrophication potential - terrestrial (EP-terrestrial)
  • 1.948
  • 0.1824
  • 0.0002335
  • 1.041
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0.01048
  • 0.05212
  • 0.01398
  • -0.09125
Photochemical Ozone Creation Potential (POCP)
  • 0.5635
  • 0.0548
  • 0.00006375
  • 0.2734
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0.002996
  • 0.01335
  • 0.004034
  • -0.02878
Depletion potential of the stratospheric ozone layer (ODP)
  • 0.00001417
  • 0.000002048
  • 1.551E-9
  • 0.0000072
  • 0
  • 0
  • 1.063E-7
  • 2.049E-7
  • 1.553E-7
  • -0.1463
Water (user) deprivation potential (WDP)
  • 2173
  • 96.63
  • 0.2476
  • 98.32
  • 0
  • 0
  • 6.788
  • 57.35
  • 22.94
  • -1601

IndicatorUnit Production
A1-A3
Transport
A4
Installation
A5
Maintenance
B2
Replacement
B4
De-construction
C1
Transport
C2
Waste processing
C3
Disposal
C4
Recycling Potential
D
1This impact category deals mainly with the eventual impact of low dose ionizing radiation on human health of the nuclear fuel cycle. It does not consider effects due to possible nuclear accidents, occupational exposure nor due to radioactive waste disposal in underground facilities. Potential ionizing radiation from the soil, from radon and from some construction materials is also not measured by this indicator.
2The results of this environmental impact indicator shall be used with care as the uncertainties on these results are high or as there is limited experiences with the indicator.
Potential Human exposure efficiency relative to U235 (IRP) 1
  • 5.205
  • 0.5972
  • 0.0004444
  • 2.087
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0.0313
  • 0.05362
  • 0.0462
  • -0.305
Potential incidence of disease due to PM emissions (PM) 2
  • 0.00001263
  • 6.982E-7
  • 7.51E-10
  • 0.00000535
  • 0
  • 0
  • 4.254E-8
  • 1.728E-7
  • 6.496E-8
  • -0.000001251
Potential Soil quality index (SQP) 2
  • 8411
  • 135.1
  • 0.1133
  • 312.2
  • 0
  • 0
  • 6.13
  • 5.397
  • 25
  • -193
Potential Comparative Toxic Unit for humans - non-cancer effects (HTP-nc) 2
  • 0.000003092
  • 9.777E-8
  • 3.92E-10
  • 8.297E-7
  • 0
  • 0
  • 7.09E-9
  • 7.218E-8
  • 6.522E-9
  • -1.03E-7
Potential Comparative Toxic Unit for humans - cancer effects (HTP-c) 2
  • 2.677E-7
  • 0
  • 8E-12
  • 8.514E-8
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 6.793E-9
  • 2.43E-10
  • -1.383E-8
Potential Comparative Toxic Unit for ecosystems (ETP-fw) 2
  • 3.89E+3
  • 97.35
  • 0.113
  • 2091
  • 0
  • 0
  • 5.355
  • 56.22
  • 6.814
  • -251.1