Close Go back Collapse all sections
Process Data set: Marble Block Stone from Norwegian Rose Quarry - China (en) en

Key Data Set Information
Location NO
Geographical representativeness description China.
Reference year 2024
Name
Marble Block Stone from Norwegian Rose Quarry - China
Use advice for data set Modules A1-A4 are included in the document. A1-A3 encompass the extraction of raw materials, transportation of those materials, and the manufacturing of shapeless and regular blocks. Both products share the processes of marble extraction from the quarry, internal transportation, cutting, and splitting. Regular blocks also undergo cutting, final inspection, and storage before being transported to markets in module A4. The blocks are exported to European countries, where natural stone factories handle further processing into various marble products.
Technical purpose of product or process Marble block stone from Fauske is quarried north of the Arctic Circle and characterized by its distinctive patterns and a range of shades and colors. These versatile blocks can be used as walling stone, exterior wall cladding, interior design, high-traffic flooring, and sculptural artistic work, to name a few. The petrographic classification of the stone is Calcitic-Dolomitic marble. The marble with its significant Dolomite content is typically more durable and better suited for high-traffic areas or exterior applications where durability is essential, making the product known for versatile usage. The stone block comes as squared or shapeless (labeled as Mosaic). The marble comes in three dominating colors: 1. Norwegian Rose, world-renowned pink marble. 2. Hermelin (Antique Fonce), classic blue-grey marble in a dark and light version. 3. Antique Verdatre, exclusive mint green-white marble.
Classification
Class name : Hierarchy level
  • EPDNorge: Construction / Natural stone
General comment on data set Data quality: Specific data for the product composition are provided by the manufacturer. The data represent the production of the declared product and were collected for EPD development in the year of study. Background data is based on EPDs according to EN 15804 and different LCA databases. The data quality of the raw materials in A1 is presented in the table below. Allocation: The allocation is made in accordance with the provisions of EN 15804. Incoming energy and water and waste production in-house is allocated equally among all products through mass allocation. Effects of primary production of recycled materials is allocated to the main product in which the material was used. The recycling process and transportation of the material is allocated to this analysis. Cut-off criteria: All major raw materials and all the essential energy is included. The production processes for raw materials and energy flows with very small amounts (less than 1%) are not included. These cut-off criteria do not apply for hazardous materials and substances.
Copyright Yes
Owner of data set
Quantitative reference
Reference flow(s)
Biogenic carbon content
  • Carbon content (biogenic): 1.0 kg
  • Carbon content (biogenic) - packaging: 1.0 kg
Time representativeness
Data set valid until 2029
Time representativeness description "2024-07-26" - "2029-07-26"
Technological representativeness
Technology description including background system Mineralogy: Calcite (65%), dolomite (30%), various auxiliary minerals (5%) The product meets the requirements set by the general reference rules UNI EN 1469/2015 and the chemical and physical properties correspond to the values specified by the relevant UNI. Reference standards: EN 1936, 12373, 13755, 1926, 12371.

Indicators of life cycle

IndicatorDirectionUnit Raw material supply
A1
Transport
A2
Manufacturing
A3
Transport
A4
De-construction
C1
Transport
C2
Waste processing
C3
Disposal
C4
Recycling Potential
D
Input
  • 150.2
  • 0
  • 0.4879
  • 68.94
  • 0.3
  • 1.768
  • 7.945
  • 0.6379
  • -6.349
Input
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
Input
  • 150.2
  • 0
  • 0.4879
  • 68.94
  • 0.3
  • 1.768
  • 7.945
  • 0.6379
  • -6.349
Input
  • 681.2
  • 0
  • 23.34
  • 4231
  • 55.07
  • 123.5
  • 15.44
  • 41.45
  • -28.62
Input
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
Input
  • 681.2
  • 0
  • 23.34
  • 4231
  • 55.07
  • 123.5
  • 15.44
  • 41.45
  • -28.62
Input
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
Input
  • 0.3063
  • 0
  • 0.02781
  • 1.294
  • 0
  • 0.06324
  • 0
  • 0.01318
  • -0.1298
Input
  • 1.681
  • 0
  • 0.0007843
  • 7.818
  • 0
  • 0.2261
  • 0
  • 0.0379
  • -0.1334
Input
  • 2.751
  • 0
  • 0.004454
  • 0.4926
  • 0.002834
  • 0.01321
  • 0.02644
  • 0.04938
  • -0.9959
Output
  • 0.2441
  • 0
  • 0.001173
  • 0.3456
  • 0.001621
  • 0.006369
  • 0.001542
  • 0
  • -0.006535
Output
  • 5.119
  • 0
  • 0.0452
  • 32.72
  • 0.06521
  • 6.006
  • 0.04872
  • 3E+2
  • -0.1982
Output
  • 0.004736
  • 0
  • 0.000134
  • 0.02837
  • 0.0003824
  • 0.0008412
  • 0.0001632
  • 0
  • -0.000215
Output
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
Output
  • 3.145
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 7E+2
  • 0
  • 0
Output
  • 0.9777
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
Output
  • 0.581
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
Output
  • 8.79
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0

IndicatorUnit Raw material supply
A1
Transport
A2
Manufacturing
A3
Transport
A4
De-construction
C1
Transport
C2
Waste processing
C3
Disposal
C4
Recycling Potential
D
Abiotic depletion potential - fossil resources (ADPF)
  • 681.1
  • 0
  • 23.33
  • 4231
  • 55.07
  • 123.5
  • 15.44
  • 41.45
  • -27.11
Abiotic depletion potential - non-fossil resources (ADPE)
  • 0.0001523
  • 0
  • 0.00003357
  • 0.002559
  • 0.00000614
  • 0.0002256
  • 0.000006308
  • 0.00001137
  • -0.0001423
Acidification potential, Accumulated Exceedance (AP)
  • 0.5112
  • 0
  • 0.003503
  • 8.985
  • 0.04186
  • 0.02347
  • 0.004023
  • 0.01254
  • -0.01443
Global Warming Potential - biogenic (GWP-biogenic)
  • 0.1477
  • 0
  • 0.001299
  • 0.1857
  • 0.0007502
  • 0.00338
  • 0.004294
  • 0.001093
  • -0.03197
Global Warming Potential - fossil fuels (GWP-fossil)
  • 49.85
  • 0
  • 0.4704
  • 327.2
  • 4
  • 8.167
  • 0.497
  • 1.285
  • -1.603
Global Warming Potential - total (GWP-total)
  • 5E+1
  • 0
  • 0.472
  • 327.4
  • 4
  • 8.173
  • 0.504
  • 1.286
  • -1.636
Global Warming Potential - land use and land use change (GWP-luluc)
  • 0.0081
  • 0
  • 0.0003564
  • 0.2613
  • 0.0003154
  • 0.002907
  • 0.0006878
  • 0.0002519
  • -0.001083
  • 49.99
  • 0
  • 0.4719
  • 462.2
  • 4
  • 8.173
  • 0.4977
  • 1.286
  • -1.714
Eutrophication potential - freshwater (EP-freshwater)
  • 0.0002797
  • 0
  • 0.00001651
  • 0.002757
  • 0.00001457
  • 0.00006525
  • 0.00003141
  • 0.000009588
  • -0.0000426
Eutrophication potential - marine (EP-marine)
  • 0.2228
  • 0
  • 0.000483
  • 2.281
  • 0.01848
  • 0.004644
  • 0.001179
  • 0.004701
  • -0.005003
Eutrophication potential - terrestrial (EP-terrestrial)
  • 2.444
  • 0
  • 0.0055
  • 25.36
  • 0.2
  • 0.05195
  • 0.01358
  • 0.0518
  • -0.05879
Photochemical Ozone Creation Potential (POCP)
  • 0.6721
  • 0
  • 0.01004
  • 6.614
  • 0.05574
  • 0.0199
  • 0.003637
  • 0.01482
  • -0.01552
Depletion potential of the stratospheric ozone layer (ODP)
  • 0.00001047
  • 0
  • 2.905E-7
  • 0.00006608
  • 8.64E-7
  • 0.00000185
  • 9.8E-8
  • 6.255E-7
  • -2.919E-7
Water (user) deprivation potential (WDP)
  • 2268
  • 0
  • 30.38
  • 1744
  • 11.7
  • 119.4
  • 1704
  • 87.26
  • -1271

IndicatorUnit Raw material supply
A1
Transport
A2
Manufacturing
A3
Transport
A4
De-construction
C1
Transport
C2
Waste processing
C3
Disposal
C4
Recycling Potential
D
1This impact category deals mainly with the eventual impact of low dose ionizing radiation on human health of the nuclear fuel cycle. It does not consider effects due to possible nuclear accidents, occupational exposure nor due to radioactive waste disposal in underground facilities. Potential ionizing radiation from the soil, from radon and from some construction materials is also not measured by this indicator.
2The results of this environmental impact indicator shall be used with care as the uncertainties on these results are high or as there is limited experiences with the indicator.
Potential Human exposure efficiency relative to U235 (IRP) 1
  • 3.099
  • 0
  • 0.09054
  • 18.37
  • 0.24
  • 0.5397
  • 0.259
  • 0.1799
  • -0.2488
Potential incidence of disease due to PM emissions (PM) 2
  • 0.00001333
  • 0
  • 2.213E-8
  • 0.00000581
  • 0.000005066
  • 5E-7
  • 6.44E-8
  • 2.67E-7
  • -3.073E-7
Potential Soil quality index (SQP) 2
  • 92.9
  • 0
  • 3.354
  • 1122
  • 6.69
  • 86.38
  • 8.729
  • 151.1
  • 61.54
Potential Comparative Toxic Unit for humans - non-cancer effects (HTP-nc) 2
  • 4.285E-7
  • 0
  • 7.374E-9
  • 0.000001337
  • 2.8E-8
  • 1E-7
  • 9.8E-9
  • 1.2E-8
  • -3.43E-8
Potential Comparative Toxic Unit for humans - cancer effects (HTP-c) 2
  • 1.821E-8
  • 0
  • 3.09E-10
  • 0
  • 1E-9
  • 0
  • 7E-10
  • 6E-10
  • -1.4E-9
Potential Comparative Toxic Unit for ecosystems (ETP-fw) 2
  • 424.9
  • 0
  • 13.12
  • 2945
  • 30.1
  • 91.54
  • 10.94
  • 20.5
  • -27.91