Close Go back Collapse all sections
Process Data set: Envistar Flex 150 with counter-flow heat exchanger and controls (en) en

Key Data Set Information
Location SE
Geographical representativeness description Europe
Reference year 2025
Name
Envistar Flex 150 with counter-flow heat exchanger and controls
Technical purpose of product or process Air Handling Unit (AHU) for non residential building. Envistar Flex air handling unit for non residential buildings. Bi-directional including counter-flow heat exchanger and integrated controls, damper and LPHW coil.
Classification
Class name : Hierarchy level
  • EPDNorge: Construction / Ventilation components
General comment on data set Data quality: Specific data for the product composition are provided by the manufacturer. The data represent the production of the declared product and were collected for EPD development in the year of study. Background data is based on EPDs according to EN 15804 and different LCA databases. The data quality of the raw materials in A1 is presented in the table below. Allocation: The allocation is made in accordance with the provisions of EN 15804. Energy, water and waste production in-house is allocated equally among all products through mass allocation. Effects of primary production of recycled materials is allocated to the main product in which the material was used. The recycling process and transportation of the material is allocated to this analysis. Cut-off criteria: All major raw materials and all the essential energy is included. The production processes for raw materials and energy flows with very small amounts (less than 1%) are not included. These cut-off criteria do not apply for hazardous materials and substances.
Copyright Yes
Owner of data set
Quantitative reference
Reference flow(s)
Biogenic carbon content
  • Carbon content (biogenic): 0.0 kg
  • Carbon content (biogenic) - packaging: 0.0 kg
Time representativeness
Data set valid until 2030
Time representativeness description 2025-02-13 - 2030-02-13
Technological representativeness
Technology description including background system According to to printout from IVP Designer (selection program).

Indicators of life cycle

IndicatorDirectionUnit Production
A1-A3
 Transport
A4
 De-construction
C1
 Transport
C2
 Waste processing
C3
 Disposal
C4
 Recycling Potential
D
Input
  • 1.318E+4
  • 5.64
  • 0
  • 1.816
  • 58.01
  • 4.471
  • -6545
Input
  • 10.83
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
Input
  • 1.319E+4
  • 5.64
  • 0
  • 1.816
  • 58.01
  • 4.471
  • -6545
Input
  • 4.348E+4
  • 422.7
  • 0
  • 126.9
  • 326.1
  • 29.02
  • -1.976E+4
Input
  • 820.5
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • -479.3
  • 0
  • 0
Input
  • 4.43E+4
  • 422.7
  • 0
  • 126.9
  • -153.2
  • 29.02
  • -1.976E+4
Input
  • 198.1
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0.0001363
  • 0.05952
  • 1.081
Input
  • 67.82
  • 0.1994
  • 0
  • 0.06496
  • 1.254
  • 0.04689
  • 5.55
Input
  • 634.3
  • 0.6896
  • 0
  • 0.2323
  • -0.00264
  • 0.8051
  • 238.4
Input
  • 96.58
  • 0.04683
  • 0
  • 0.01357
  • 0.3229
  • 0.03805
  • -35.19
Output
  • 26.21
  • 0.02254
  • 0
  • 0.006542
  • 0.00139
  • 3.568
  • 4.339
Output
  • 1035
  • 29.63
  • 0
  • 6.169
  • 50.11
  • 57.45
  • -494.9
Output
  • 0.1665
  • 0.002883
  • 0
  • 0.0008641
  • 0.00006985
  • 0.00000453
  • -0.07191
Output
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
Output
  • 68.89
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 500.8
  • 0.0001186
  • -0.05719
Output
  • 22.47
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 49.03
  • 0.0000033
  • -0.007403
Output
  • 13.24
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 1.153
  • 0.0001375
  • -0.02349
Output
  • 200.4
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 17.44
  • 0.00208
  • -0.3553

IndicatorUnit Production
A1-A3
 Transport
A4
 De-construction
C1
 Transport
C2
 Waste processing
C3
 Disposal
C4
 Recycling Potential
D
Abiotic depletion potential - fossil resources (ADPF)
  • 4.366E+4
  • 422.7
  • 0
  • 126.8
  • 324.5
  • 28.99
  • -1.976E+4
Abiotic depletion potential - non-fossil resources (ADPE)
  • 0.9162
  • 0.0005993
  • 0
  • 0.0002317
  • 0.0002838
  • 0.00001178
  • -0.08142
Acidification potential, Accumulated Exceedance (AP)
  • 29.84
  • 0.08228
  • 0
  • 0.02411
  • 0.1177
  • 0.01131
  • -13.96
Global Warming Potential - biogenic (GWP-biogenic)
  • 25.7
  • 0.01133
  • 0
  • 0.003472
  • 0.1859
  • 0.002707
  • -6.507
Global Warming Potential - fossil fuels (GWP-fossil)
  • 3476
  • 26.87
  • 0
  • 8.389
  • 112.8
  • 3.798
  • -1629
Global Warming Potential - total (GWP-total)
  • 3518
  • 26.89
  • 0
  • 8.396
  • 113
  • 3.807
  • -1661
Global Warming Potential - land use and land use change (GWP-luluc)
  • 16.3
  • 0.008817
  • 0
  • 0.002986
  • 0.02259
  • 0.005564
  • -25.95
  • 3512
  • 26.89
  • 0
  • 8.395
  • 96.53
  • 3.928
  • -1706
Eutrophication potential - freshwater (EP-freshwater)
  • 0.2195
  • 0.0002142
  • 0
  • 0.00006702
  • 0.001796
  • 0.00005755
  • -0.0874
Eutrophication potential - marine (EP-marine)
  • 3.848
  • 0.01727
  • 0
  • 0.004771
  • 0.02524
  • 0.003215
  • -1.569
Eutrophication potential - terrestrial (EP-terrestrial)
  • 64.25
  • 0.1929
  • 0
  • 0.05336
  • 0.2817
  • 0.03514
  • -17.64
Photochemical Ozone Creation Potential (POCP)
  • 14.27
  • 0.07498
  • 0
  • 0.02044
  • 0.07847
  • 0.01114
  • -6.132
Depletion potential of the stratospheric ozone layer (ODP)
  • 0.0002852
  • 0.0000063
  • 0
  • 0.0000019
  • 0.000008756
  • 2.97E-7
  • -0.06543
Water (user) deprivation potential (WDP)
  • 5.222E+5
  • 361.3
  • 0
  • 122.7
  • 1266
  • 443.1
  • -7.666E+5

IndicatorUnit Production
A1-A3
 Transport
A4
 De-construction
C1
 Transport
C2
 Waste processing
C3
 Disposal
C4
 Recycling Potential
D
1This impact category deals mainly with the eventual impact of low dose ionizing radiation on human health of the nuclear fuel cycle. It does not consider effects due to possible nuclear accidents, occupational exposure nor due to radioactive waste disposal in underground facilities. Potential ionizing radiation from the soil, from radon and from some construction materials is also not measured by this indicator.
2The results of this environmental impact indicator shall be used with care as the uncertainties on these results are high or as there is limited experiences with the indicator.
Potential Human exposure efficiency relative to U235 (IRP) 1
  • 183.6
  • 1.847
  • 0
  • 0.5544
  • 1.491
  • 0.132
  • -76.58
Potential incidence of disease due to PM emissions (PM) 2
  • 0.0002958
  • 0.000002092
  • 0
  • 5.136E-7
  • 0.000001711
  • 1.466E-7
  • -0.0001209
Potential Soil quality index (SQP) 2
  • 1.731E+4
  • 401.5
  • 0
  • 88.73
  • 126.9
  • 83.85
  • -898.9
Potential Comparative Toxic Unit for humans - non-cancer effects (HTP-nc) 2
  • 0.000199
  • 3.179E-7
  • 0
  • 1.027E-7
  • 0.00000323
  • 6.483E-7
  • -0.00003201
Potential Comparative Toxic Unit for humans - cancer effects (HTP-c) 2
  • 0.00001284
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 1.197E-7
  • 1.305E-8
  • -0.000004698
Potential Comparative Toxic Unit for ecosystems (ETP-fw) 2
  • 1.642E+5
  • 310.9
  • 0
  • 94.03
  • 1634
  • 7.21E+3
  • -6.06E+4