Close Go back Collapse all sections
Process Data set: Twin chair w/wooden legs (en) en

Key Data Set Information
Location EE
Geographical representativeness description Europa and USA
Reference year 2025
Name
Twin chair w/wooden legs
Technical purpose of product or process Twin is a unique chair with beautiful flow in the design, and looks equally good from all angles. The soft, organic design invites you to a flexible and relaxed sitting position, where you sit exactly as it comes most naturally to you. The wooden base bears witness to good craftsmanship, with great details and finger joints. It is also very easy to clean, with a crumb gap between the seat, back and armrests. Distance between seat and back - Right/left facing armrests - Upolstered seat/back - Wooden base - Chemical disinfectant ok (acid-cured varnish) - EPD (Environmental Product Declaration) - Møbelfakta
Classification
Class name : Hierarchy level
  • EPDNorge: Furniture / Soft seating
General comment on data set Data quality: Specific data for the product composition are provided by the manufacturer. They represent the production of the declared product and were collected for EPD development in the year of study. Background data is based on registered EPDs according to EN 15804, Ostfold Research databases, ecoinvent and other LCA databases. The data quality of the raw materials in A1 is presented in the table below. Allocation: The allocation is made in accordance with the provisions of EN 15804. Incoming energy and water and waste production in-house is allocated equally among all products through mass allocation. Effects of primary production of recycled materials is allocated to the main product in which the material was used. The recycling process and transportation of the material is allocated to this analysis. Cut-off criteria: All major raw materials and all the essential energy is included. The production processes for raw materials and energy flows with very small amounts (less than 1%) are not included. These cut-off criteria do not apply for hazardous materials and substances.
Copyright Yes
Owner of data set
Quantitative reference
Reference flow(s)
Biogenic carbon content
  • Carbon content (biogenic): 0.739285714286 kg
  • Carbon content (biogenic) - packaging: 1.2962962964 kg
Time representativeness
Data set valid until 2030
Time representativeness description 2025-05-22 - 2030-05-22
Technological representativeness
Technology description including background system Width: 69cm, Height: 79cm, Depth: 75cm, Seat height 43cm, Max. user weight 160 kg Weight: 12,55 kg (without cardboard) The product is tested and approved according to the following standards: The testing laboratory has been accredited by the Latvian National Accreditation Bureau LATAK in accordance with the requirements of LVS EN ISO/IEC 17025:2017 and has been assigned registration No. T-316. NS-EN 16139: 2013 NS-EN 1022: 2005 NS-EN 1335-3: 2005 NS-EN 1728: 2012

Indicators of life cycle

IndicatorDirectionUnit Production
A1-A3
Transport
A4
Installation
A5
Maintenance
B2
Repair
B3
Replacement
B4
De-construction
C1
Transport
C2
Waste processing
C3
Disposal
C4
Recycling Potential
D
Input
  • 185
  • 0.7934
  • 0.003433
  • 20.46
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0.04851
  • 0.1344
  • 0.02446
  • -60.14
Input
  • 39.55
  • 0
  • -4.095
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • -23.17
  • 0
  • 0
Input
  • 224.6
  • 0.7934
  • -4.092
  • 20.46
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0.04851
  • -23.03
  • 0.02446
  • -60.14
Input
  • 989.5
  • 52.64
  • 0.1911
  • 107.1
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 1.071
  • 4.761
  • 1.062
  • -23.92
Input
  • 149.1
  • 0
  • -4.247
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • -144.9
  • 0
  • 0
Input
  • 1139
  • 52.64
  • -4.056
  • 107.1
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 1.071
  • -140.1
  • 1.062
  • -23.92
Input
  • 3.944
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
Input
  • 0.7872
  • 0.02846
  • 0.0001081
  • 1.496
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0.001576
  • 0.003176
  • 0.0006363
  • 0.05137
Input
  • 0.617
  • 0.1023
  • 0.0004132
  • 0.3927
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0.005434
  • 0
  • 0.04321
  • -1.7
Input
  • 0.9039
  • 0.005809
  • 0.00009201
  • 0.8715
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0.0004381
  • 0.01661
  • 0.0009594
  • -0.07462
Output
  • 0.4466
  • 0.00277
  • 0
  • 0.01628
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0.0001503
  • 0
  • 3.887
  • -0.009329
Output
  • 12.35
  • 2.425
  • 0.8
  • 0.4023
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0.1593
  • 0
  • 0.1429
  • -0.9239
Output
  • 0.003686
  • 0.0003576
  • 0
  • 0.0007587
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0.00000429
  • 0
  • 0.0000065
  • -0.00004527
Output
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
Output
  • 0.05307
  • 0
  • 0.7022
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 1.941
  • 0
  • 0
Output
  • 0.602
  • 0
  • 0.000005953
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 12.3
  • 0
  • 0
Output
  • 0.3528
  • 0
  • 0.04005
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 7.577
  • 0
  • 0
Output
  • 5.338
  • 0
  • 0.6058
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 114.6
  • 0
  • 0

IndicatorUnit Production
A1-A3
Transport
A4
Installation
A5
Maintenance
B2
Repair
B3
Replacement
B4
De-construction
C1
Transport
C2
Waste processing
C3
Disposal
C4
Recycling Potential
D
Abiotic depletion potential - fossil resources (ADPF)
  • 1136
  • 52.63
  • 0.1911
  • 106.9
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 1.071
  • 4.746
  • 1.062
  • -23.93
Abiotic depletion potential - non-fossil resources (ADPE)
  • 0.001565
  • 0.0001048
  • 3.178E-7
  • 0.00004386
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0.000006152
  • 0.000002143
  • 7.859E-7
  • -0.00003612
Acidification potential, Accumulated Exceedance (AP)
  • 0.4228
  • 0.01004
  • 0.00006339
  • 0.03053
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0.0003549
  • 0.009779
  • 0.0003375
  • -0.01399
Global Warming Potential - biogenic (GWP-biogenic)
  • -6.597
  • 0.001494
  • 1.188
  • 0.03657
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0.00008574
  • 4.055
  • 0.00004344
  • -0.002321
Global Warming Potential - fossil fuels (GWP-fossil)
  • 74.38
  • 3.493
  • 0.01924
  • 5.229
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0.0506
  • 10.82
  • 0.05429
  • -2.376
Global Warming Potential - total (GWP-total)
  • 68.02
  • 3.496
  • 1.208
  • 5.277
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0.05076
  • 14.88
  • 0.05435
  • -2.402
Global Warming Potential - land use and land use change (GWP-luluc)
  • 0.2425
  • 0.001319
  • 0.000004352
  • 0.01198
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0.00007891
  • 0.00007112
  • 0.00001445
  • -0.02377
  • 78.3
  • 3.496
  • 0.01925
  • 5.642
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0.05076
  • 12.32
  • 0.0577
  • -3.241
Eutrophication potential - freshwater (EP-freshwater)
  • 0.003438
  • 0.00002907
  • 1.093E-7
  • 0.0005512
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0.000001858
  • 0.00000431
  • 5.878E-7
  • -0.0001645
Eutrophication potential - marine (EP-marine)
  • 0.08108
  • 0.001962
  • 0.00002667
  • 0.003924
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0.00009389
  • 0.005435
  • 0.0001183
  • -0.003555
Eutrophication potential - terrestrial (EP-terrestrial)
  • 0.7901
  • 0.02197
  • 0.000227
  • 0.04821
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0.00105
  • 0.05212
  • 0.001315
  • -0.0374
Photochemical Ozone Creation Potential (POCP)
  • 0.268
  • 0.00841
  • 0.0000667
  • 0.0124
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0.0003842
  • 0.01241
  • 0.0003762
  • -0.01392
Depletion potential of the stratospheric ozone layer (ODP)
  • 0.00000665
  • 7.844E-7
  • 2.867E-9
  • 4.439E-7
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 1.044E-8
  • 5.722E-8
  • 1.416E-8
  • -0.04864
Water (user) deprivation potential (WDP)
  • 4437
  • 54.28
  • 0.3162
  • 1621
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 3.172
  • 14.29
  • 3.096
  • -30.31

IndicatorUnit Production
A1-A3
Transport
A4
Installation
A5
Maintenance
B2
Repair
B3
Replacement
B4
De-construction
C1
Transport
C2
Waste processing
C3
Disposal
C4
Recycling Potential
D
1This impact category deals mainly with the eventual impact of low dose ionizing radiation on human health of the nuclear fuel cycle. It does not consider effects due to possible nuclear accidents, occupational exposure nor due to radioactive waste disposal in underground facilities. Potential ionizing radiation from the soil, from radon and from some construction materials is also not measured by this indicator.
2The results of this environmental impact indicator shall be used with care as the uncertainties on these results are high or as there is limited experiences with the indicator.
Potential Human exposure efficiency relative to U235 (IRP) 1
  • 3.601
  • 0.2301
  • 0.0008254
  • 0.9283
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0.003498
  • 0.007521
  • 0.004339
  • -0.05486
Potential incidence of disease due to PM emissions (PM) 2
  • 0.000005388
  • 2.088E-7
  • 9.67E-10
  • 8.905E-8
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 1.174E-8
  • 4.21E-8
  • 5.907E-9
  • -4.751E-7
Potential Soil quality index (SQP) 2
  • 511.9
  • 35.27
  • 0.1633
  • 26
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 1.996
  • 0.5491
  • 2.395
  • -64.91
Potential Comparative Toxic Unit for humans - non-cancer effects (HTP-nc) 2
  • 0.000001666
  • 4.451E-8
  • 2.94E-10
  • 8.55E-8
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 2.61E-9
  • 3.468E-8
  • 9.33E-10
  • 1.288E-7
Potential Comparative Toxic Unit for humans - cancer effects (HTP-c) 2
  • 1.588E-7
  • 0
  • 7E-12
  • 2.74E-9
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 1.023E-9
  • 3.1E-11
  • -9.169E-9
Potential Comparative Toxic Unit for ecosystems (ETP-fw) 2
  • 2619
  • 39.59
  • 0.2424
  • 76.67
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 1.563
  • 3E+1
  • 0.7754
  • -147.2