Close Go back Collapse all sections
Process Data set: OFFECCT Circulus (en) en

Key Data Set Information
Location PL
Geographical representativeness description Worldwide
Reference year 2025
Name
OFFECCT Circulus
Technical purpose of product or process Circulus, Latin for circle, plays on the very essence of the new sofa. It combines one of the core design elements with the ambition to design and manufacture an innovative sofa system with circularity in mind. Unlimited in every sense: colours, comfort, adaptability, and durability, and above all, recyclability. It’s simply made for endless life and possibilities. The model analyzed in detail in this declaration is the OFFECCT Circulus 2-seater sofa with a high backrest, upholstered in Xtreme fabric from Camira, including packaging. Key environmental indicators for other models and options of the OFFECCT Circulus are presented in tables on pages 12–13 of this declaration.
Classification
Class name : Hierarchy level
  • EPDNorge: Furniture / Soft seating
General comment on data set Data quality: Specific data for the product composition are provided by the manufacturer. They represent the production of the declared product and were collected for EPD development in the year of study. Background data is based on registered EPDs according to EN 15804, Ostfold Research databases, ecoinvent and other LCA databases. The data quality of the raw materials in A1 is presented in the table below. Allocation: The allocation is made in accordance with the provisions of EN 15804. Incoming energy and water and waste production in-house is allocated equally among all products through mass allocation. Effects of primary production of recycled materials is allocated to the main product in which the material was used. The recycling process and transportation of the material is allocated to this analysis. Cut-off criteria: All major raw materials and all the essential energy is included. The production processes for raw materials and energy flows with very small amounts (less than 1%) are not included. These cut-off criteria do not apply for hazardous materials and substances.
Copyright Yes
Owner of data set
Quantitative reference
Reference flow(s)
Biogenic carbon content
  • Carbon content (biogenic): 0.100000000008 kg
  • Carbon content (biogenic) - packaging: 4.373375262398 kg
Time representativeness
Data set valid until 2030
Time representativeness description 2025-06-02 - 2030-06-02
Technological representativeness
Technology description including background system The Circulus sofa system offers virtually unlimited possibilities to easily configure and tailor a sofa for any environment. You can play around with one, two and three seat combinations anyway you like, add high and low back rests, place in a row or with facing seats. Then add 74 frame colours and a multitude of fabrics and upholstery colours of your choice. You can do the math. The only limit is your imagination.

Indicators of life cycle

IndicatorDirectionUnit Production
A1-A3
Transport
A4
Installation
A5
Maintenance
B2
Repair
B3
Replacement
B4
De-construction
C1
Transport
C2
Waste processing
C3
Disposal
C4
Recycling Potential
D
Input
  • 980.7
  • 1.033
  • 0.04758
  • 19.88
  • 0.9053
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0.1751
  • 0.2561
  • 0.1508
  • -135.7
Input
  • 95.75
  • 0
  • -107.8
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • -1.382
  • 0
  • 0
Input
  • 1076
  • 1.033
  • -107.7
  • 19.88
  • 0.9053
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0.1751
  • -1.126
  • 0.1508
  • -135.7
Input
  • 3078
  • 82.09
  • 2.809
  • 108.3
  • 4.876
  • 0
  • 0
  • 12.41
  • 7.28
  • 8.189
  • -221
Input
  • 213.8
  • 0
  • -19.03
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • -195.7
  • 0
  • 0
Input
  • 3292
  • 82.09
  • -16.23
  • 108.3
  • 4.876
  • 0
  • 0
  • 12.41
  • -188.4
  • 8.189
  • -221
Input
  • 20.18
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • -0.0005173
Input
  • 5.486
  • 0.03614
  • 0.001551
  • 1.383
  • 0.06265
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0.006266
  • 0.005837
  • 0.003998
  • 0.1392
Input
  • 0.7143
  • 0.1211
  • 0.006243
  • 0.3697
  • 0.01507
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0.02237
  • 0
  • 0.169
  • 1.003
Input
  • 6.139
  • 0.009347
  • 0.001334
  • 0.8694
  • 0.00399
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0.001306
  • 0.0179
  • 0.00738
  • -0.4291
Output
  • 1.965
  • 0.004494
  • 0
  • 0.01871
  • 0.0008389
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0.0006327
  • 0
  • 32.21
  • 0.02971
Output
  • 59.2
  • 7.14
  • 12.2
  • 0.4238
  • 0.01731
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0.5929
  • 1.082
  • 0.3269
  • -6.12
Output
  • 0.01513
  • 0.0005604
  • 0
  • 0.0007213
  • 0.00003265
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0.00008459
  • 0
  • 0.00005074
  • -0.000735
Output
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
Output
  • 0.8328
  • 0
  • 11.16
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 7.991
  • 0
  • -0.00006964
Output
  • 0.000006605
  • 0
  • 0.001857
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 48.18
  • 0
  • -0.000008401
Output
  • 0.4604
  • 0
  • 0.6713
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 9.209
  • 0
  • -0.00005287
Output
  • 6.966
  • 0
  • 10.16
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 139.3
  • 0
  • -0.0007999

IndicatorUnit Production
A1-A3
Transport
A4
Installation
A5
Maintenance
B2
Repair
B3
Replacement
B4
De-construction
C1
Transport
C2
Waste processing
C3
Disposal
C4
Recycling Potential
D
Abiotic depletion potential - fossil resources (ADPF)
  • 3.27E+3
  • 82.08
  • 2.809
  • 108.1
  • 4.869
  • 0
  • 0
  • 12.41
  • 7.123
  • 8.188
  • -221
Abiotic depletion potential - non-fossil resources (ADPE)
  • 0.02722
  • 0.00009012
  • 0.000004818
  • 0.0000434
  • 0.000001689
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0.00002228
  • 0.000003917
  • 0.000006189
  • -0.0001132
Acidification potential, Accumulated Exceedance (AP)
  • 1.354
  • 0.02218
  • 0.0009447
  • 0.03219
  • 0.00144
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0.003363
  • 0.01213
  • 0.002528
  • -0.1212
Global Warming Potential - biogenic (GWP-biogenic)
  • -14.14
  • 0.002166
  • 19.92
  • 0.0361
  • 0.001618
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0.0003355
  • 4.61
  • 0.0002846
  • -0.06521
Global Warming Potential - fossil fuels (GWP-fossil)
  • 217
  • 5.277
  • 0.2269
  • 5.62
  • 0.2516
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0.8227
  • 13.59
  • 0.3558
  • -18.94
Global Warming Potential - total (GWP-total)
  • 205.4
  • 5.281
  • 20.15
  • 5.668
  • 0.2538
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0.8234
  • 18.2
  • 0.3562
  • -19.28
Global Warming Potential - land use and land use change (GWP-luluc)
  • 2.569
  • 0.001541
  • 0.00006563
  • 0.01266
  • 0.0005745
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0.0002876
  • 0.0001599
  • 0.0001079
  • -0.2814
  • 221.2
  • 5.281
  • 0.2269
  • 5.988
  • 0.2688
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0.8233
  • 18.32
  • 0.3675
  • -18.65
Eutrophication potential - freshwater (EP-freshwater)
  • 0.01277
  • 0.00004024
  • 0.000001635
  • 0.0005475
  • 0.00002473
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0.000006461
  • 0.00001117
  • 0.000003537
  • -0.0008897
Eutrophication potential - marine (EP-marine)
  • 0.2059
  • 0.00667
  • 0.0003391
  • 0.004311
  • 0.000191
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0.0009974
  • 0.00633
  • 0.0009017
  • -0.01855
Eutrophication potential - terrestrial (EP-terrestrial)
  • 2.183
  • 0.07377
  • 0.003383
  • 0.0522
  • 0.002318
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0.01103
  • 0.06274
  • 0.009963
  • -0.1999
Photochemical Ozone Creation Potential (POCP)
  • 0.777
  • 0.02372
  • 0.0009791
  • 0.01353
  • 0.0005935
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0.003377
  • 0.01525
  • 0.002872
  • -0.07309
Depletion potential of the stratospheric ozone layer (ODP)
  • 0.00002324
  • 0.000001219
  • 4.23E-8
  • 4.392E-7
  • 1.953E-8
  • 0
  • 0
  • 1.876E-7
  • 9.17E-8
  • 1.108E-7
  • -0.05889
Water (user) deprivation potential (WDP)
  • 6.385E+4
  • 62.97
  • 3.906
  • 1506
  • 66.97
  • 0
  • 0
  • 11.83
  • 10.24
  • 15.92
  • -7472

IndicatorUnit Production
A1-A3
Transport
A4
Installation
A5
Maintenance
B2
Repair
B3
Replacement
B4
De-construction
C1
Transport
C2
Waste processing
C3
Disposal
C4
Recycling Potential
D
1This impact category deals mainly with the eventual impact of low dose ionizing radiation on human health of the nuclear fuel cycle. It does not consider effects due to possible nuclear accidents, occupational exposure nor due to radioactive waste disposal in underground facilities. Potential ionizing radiation from the soil, from radon and from some construction materials is also not measured by this indicator.
2The results of this environmental impact indicator shall be used with care as the uncertainties on these results are high or as there is limited experiences with the indicator.
Potential Human exposure efficiency relative to U235 (IRP) 1
  • 16.34
  • 0.3587
  • 0.01205
  • 0.8896
  • 0.04033
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0.05423
  • 0.01407
  • 0.03284
  • -0.7884
Potential incidence of disease due to PM emissions (PM) 2
  • 0.00001438
  • 4.645E-7
  • 1.408E-8
  • 1.141E-7
  • 4.749E-9
  • 0
  • 0
  • 5.923E-8
  • 1.003E-7
  • 4.633E-8
  • -0.000001735
Potential Soil quality index (SQP) 2
  • 1444
  • 94.16
  • 2.048
  • 25.32
  • 1.131
  • 0
  • 0
  • 8.553
  • 1.061
  • 17.74
  • -81.88
Potential Comparative Toxic Unit for humans - non-cancer effects (HTP-nc) 2
  • 0.000008441
  • 5.807E-8
  • 4.586E-9
  • 8.809E-8
  • 3.369E-9
  • 0
  • 0
  • 9.872E-9
  • 4.958E-8
  • 4.533E-9
  • 5.385E-8
Potential Comparative Toxic Unit for humans - cancer effects (HTP-c) 2
  • 8.995E-7
  • 0
  • 1.09E-10
  • 2.793E-9
  • 9.7E-11
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 2.143E-9
  • 1.7E-10
  • -5.828E-8
Potential Comparative Toxic Unit for ecosystems (ETP-fw) 2
  • 7387
  • 60.03
  • 3.688
  • 86.63
  • 3.84
  • 0
  • 0
  • 9.137
  • 157
  • 4.802
  • -541.6