Close Go back Collapse all sections
Process Data set: Dundra S70 (en) en

Key Data Set Information
Location SE
Geographical representativeness description European market
Reference year 2025
Name
Dundra S70
Technical purpose of product or process Stefan Borselius has designed the Dundra seating series that is constructed around a chromed steel frame with upholstered moulded seats. The covered button that is one of the hallmarks of this family of furnishings helps ensure that the backrest retains its intended shape. Dundra chair is a great choice in, for example, restaurants, hotels and libraries. Dundra S70 is one of many variations in the Dundra family. Dundra is made for non-domestic environments. https://www.blastation.com/products/product-families/dundra/dundra#&tab=1 Wood and steel frame. Moulded HR foam padding. Upholstered in fabric or leather. Leather as per colour chart. 6a. Chrome plated (chrome III) or painted steel frame. Plastic foot. S70 and S70A are stackable.
Classification
Class name : Hierarchy level
  • EPDNorge: Furniture / Soft seating
General comment on data set Data quality: Specific data for the product composition are provided by the manufacturer. They represent the production of the declared product and were collected for EPD development in the year of study. Background data is based on registered EPDs according to EN 15804, Ostfold Research databases, ecoinvent and other LCA databases. The data quality of the raw materials in A1 is presented in the table below. Allocation: The allocation is made in accordance with the provisions of EN 15804. Incoming energy and water and waste production in-house is allocated equally among all products through mass allocation. Effects of primary production of recycled materials is allocated to the main product in which the material was used. The recycling process and transportation of the material is allocated to this analysis. Cut-off criteria: All major raw materials and all the essential energy is included. The production processes for raw materials and energy flows with very small amounts (less than 1%) are not included. These cut-off criteria do not apply for hazardous materials and substances.
Copyright Yes
Owner of data set
Quantitative reference
Reference flow(s)
Biogenic carbon content
  • Carbon content (biogenic): 0.604847104889 kg
  • Carbon content (biogenic) - packaging: 0.762719907844 kg
Time representativeness
Data set valid until 2030
Time representativeness description 2025-11-30 - 2030-11-30
Technological representativeness
Technology description including background system Dimensions: Seat height = 46 Overall height = 80 Seat width = 45 Overall width = 50 Seat depth = 43 Overall depth = 56 The product is tested and approved according to the following standard: EN 16139:2013 Furniture - Strength, durability and safety - Requirements for non-domestic seating. Test level 1

Indicators of life cycle

IndicatorDirectionUnit Production
A1-A3
Transport
A4
Installation
A5
Maintenance
B2
Repair
B3
Replacement
B4
De-construction
C1
Transport
C2
Waste processing
C3
Disposal
C4
Recycling Potential
D
Input
  • 142.5
  • 0.1008
  • 0.01115
  • 0.0003975
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0.01008
  • 0.03564
  • 0.01238
  • -17.79
Input
  • 42.18
  • 0
  • -22.94
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • -19.12
  • 0
  • 0
Input
  • 184.7
  • 0.1008
  • -22.93
  • 0.0003975
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0.01008
  • -19.09
  • 0.01238
  • -17.79
Input
  • 399.6
  • 7.039
  • 0.5572
  • 0.002934
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0.7039
  • 1.161
  • 0.6281
  • -11.86
Input
  • 31.93
  • 0
  • -5.171
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • -26.71
  • 0
  • 0
Input
  • 431.6
  • 7.039
  • -4.614
  • 0.002934
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0.7039
  • -25.55
  • 0.6281
  • -11.86
Input
  • 1.171
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
Input
  • 0.3616
  • 0.003605
  • 0.0003301
  • 0.00003195
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0.0003605
  • 0.0008145
  • 0.000326
  • 0.03606
Input
  • 0.1819
  • 0.01289
  • 0.003041
  • 0.0000315
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0.001289
  • 0
  • 0.01914
  • 0.126
Input
  • 0.4909
  • 0.0007528
  • 0.0003665
  • 0.0005029
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0.00007528
  • 0.003648
  • 0.0005663
  • -0.02281
Output
  • 0.05479
  • 0.000363
  • 0
  • 5.54E-7
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0.0000363
  • 0
  • 2.408
  • -0.00575
Output
  • 4.359
  • 0.3423
  • 1.909
  • 0.00003561
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0.03423
  • 0
  • 0.03931
  • -0.5072
Output
  • 0.003751
  • 0.00004795
  • 0
  • 1.716E-8
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0.000004795
  • 0
  • 0.000003851
  • -0.00001147
Output
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
Output
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0.5592
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 1.228
  • 0
  • 0
Output
  • 0
  • 0
  • 1.277
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 5.753
  • 0
  • 0
Output
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0.8928
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 2.164
  • 0
  • 0
Output
  • 0
  • 0
  • 13.51
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 32.75
  • 0
  • 0

IndicatorUnit Production
A1-A3
Transport
A4
Installation
A5
Maintenance
B2
Repair
B3
Replacement
B4
De-construction
C1
Transport
C2
Waste processing
C3
Disposal
C4
Recycling Potential
D
Abiotic depletion potential - fossil resources (ADPF)
  • 431
  • 7.039
  • 0.5571
  • 0.002931
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0.7039
  • 1.151
  • 0.628
  • -11.86
Abiotic depletion potential - non-fossil resources (ADPE)
  • 0.0003781
  • 0.00001286
  • 8.084E-7
  • 4.796E-9
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0.000001286
  • 5.505E-7
  • 4.719E-7
  • -0.00002058
Acidification potential, Accumulated Exceedance (AP)
  • 0.1025
  • 0.001338
  • 0.0003236
  • 0.000001001
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0.0001338
  • 0.002174
  • 0.0001954
  • -0.006964
Global Warming Potential - biogenic (GWP-biogenic)
  • -2.433
  • 0.0001927
  • 0.3759
  • 0.00000108
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0.00001927
  • 3.128
  • 0.00002499
  • -0.000995
Global Warming Potential - fossil fuels (GWP-fossil)
  • 28.38
  • 0.4655
  • 0.05233
  • 0.0001716
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0.04655
  • 2.22
  • 0.02862
  • -1.274
Global Warming Potential - total (GWP-total)
  • 26.02
  • 0.4659
  • 0.9259
  • 0.000173
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0.04659
  • 5.347
  • 0.02865
  • -1.282
Global Warming Potential - land use and land use change (GWP-luluc)
  • 0.0734
  • 0.0001657
  • 0.00001224
  • 2.793E-7
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0.00001657
  • 0.00001922
  • 0.000008349
  • -0.007134
  • 28.39
  • 0.4659
  • 0.4227
  • 0.0001729
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0.04659
  • 3.278
  • 0.03074
  • -1.817
Eutrophication potential - freshwater (EP-freshwater)
  • 0.001301
  • 0.000003719
  • 4.945E-7
  • 1.372E-8
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 3.719E-7
  • 0.000001422
  • 2.925E-7
  • -0.00008369
Eutrophication potential - marine (EP-marine)
  • 0.02185
  • 0.0002647
  • 0.0001409
  • 1.589E-7
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0.00002647
  • 0.001183
  • 0.00006938
  • -0.001632
Eutrophication potential - terrestrial (EP-terrestrial)
  • 0.2723
  • 0.002961
  • 0.001433
  • 0.000001848
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0.0002961
  • 0.01145
  • 0.0007691
  • -0.01699
Photochemical Ozone Creation Potential (POCP)
  • 0.07729
  • 0.001134
  • 0.0003761
  • 5.809E-7
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0.0001134
  • 0.002754
  • 0.0002209
  • -0.006968
Depletion potential of the stratospheric ozone layer (ODP)
  • 9.359E-7
  • 1.054E-7
  • 7.793E-9
  • 1.5E-11
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 1.054E-8
  • 1.345E-8
  • 8.459E-9
  • -0.01406
Water (user) deprivation potential (WDP)
  • 3426
  • 6.808
  • 0.908
  • 0.05222
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0.6808
  • 3.152
  • 1.391
  • 21.69

IndicatorUnit Production
A1-A3
Transport
A4
Installation
A5
Maintenance
B2
Repair
B3
Replacement
B4
De-construction
C1
Transport
C2
Waste processing
C3
Disposal
C4
Recycling Potential
D
1This impact category deals mainly with the eventual impact of low dose ionizing radiation on human health of the nuclear fuel cycle. It does not consider effects due to possible nuclear accidents, occupational exposure nor due to radioactive waste disposal in underground facilities. Potential ionizing radiation from the soil, from radon and from some construction materials is also not measured by this indicator.
2The results of this environmental impact indicator shall be used with care as the uncertainties on these results are high or as there is limited experiences with the indicator.
Potential Human exposure efficiency relative to U235 (IRP) 1
  • 1.714
  • 0.03076
  • 0.002135
  • 0.00002025
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0.003076
  • 0.002015
  • 0.002527
  • -0.01375
Potential incidence of disease due to PM emissions (PM) 2
  • 0.000001686
  • 2.85E-8
  • 4.13E-9
  • 9E-12
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 2.85E-9
  • 1.404E-8
  • 3.536E-9
  • -1.861E-7
Potential Soil quality index (SQP) 2
  • 966.1
  • 4.923
  • 0.3749
  • 0.0008186
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0.4923
  • 0.152
  • 1.378
  • -19.14
Potential Comparative Toxic Unit for humans - non-cancer effects (HTP-nc) 2
  • 0.000001075
  • 5.7E-9
  • 2.642E-9
  • 1.1E-11
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 5.7E-10
  • 8.982E-9
  • 4.03E-10
  • 9.865E-8
Potential Comparative Toxic Unit for humans - cancer effects (HTP-c) 2
  • 8.054E-8
  • 0
  • 5.6E-11
  • 1E-12
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 3.5E-10
  • 1.4E-11
  • -5.474E-9
Potential Comparative Toxic Unit for ecosystems (ETP-fw) 2
  • 703.2
  • 5.218
  • 0.6501
  • 0.003175
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0.5218
  • 7.174
  • 0.393
  • -75.29