Close Go back Collapse all sections
Process Data set: Profim Snap (en) en

Key Data Set Information
Location PL
Geographical representativeness description Worldwide
Reference year 2024
Name
Profim Snap
Technical purpose of product or process Snap is a versatile chair designed for both work and relaxation, offering exceptional comfort paired with an elegant, timeless aesthetic. This chair represents Profim’s next step in innovative furniture design and production. The collection was designed by the Swedish Note Design Studio, renowned for blending functionality with sophisticated design. The model studied in detail in this declaration is the Profim Snap 21H - 4-legged metal frame without armrests and pads, upholstered in Xtreme fabric from Camira, - including carton box packaging.
Classification
Class name : Hierarchy level
  • EPDNorge: Furniture / Soft seating
General comment on data set Data quality: Specific data for the product composition are provided by the manufacturer. They represent the production of the declared product and were collected for EPD development in the year of study. Background data is based on registered EPDs according to EN 15804, Ostfold Research databases, ecoinvent and other LCA databases. The data quality of the raw materials in A1 is presented in the table below. Allocation: The allocation is made in accordance with the provisions of EN 15804. Incoming energy and water and waste production in-house is allocated equally among all products through mass allocation. Effects of primary production of recycled materials is allocated to the main product in which the material was used. The recycling process and transportation of the material is allocated to this analysis. Cut-off criteria: All major raw materials and all the essential energy is included. The production processes for raw materials and energy flows with very small amounts (less than 1%) are not included. These cut-off criteria do not apply for hazardous materials and substances.
Copyright Yes
Owner of data set
Quantitative reference
Reference flow(s)
Biogenic carbon content
  • Carbon content (biogenic): 0.0 kg
  • Carbon content (biogenic) - packaging: 2.171802935183 kg
Time representativeness
Data set valid until 2029
Time representativeness description "2024-09-06" - "2029-09-06"
Technological representativeness
Technology description including background system The Snap armchair epitomizes comfort and style, designed to maximize user comfort. Collection offers two distinct aesthetics: the softer and more expressive Fluffy (21H) and the slim and delicate Slim (20H). Designed to support the body and promote well-being in the workplace, Snap enhances employee productivity. Created with sustainability in mind, Snap employs innovative technologies and environmentally friendly materials, minimizing the negative impact on the planet while maintaining high quality and durability. The seat is composed of up to 70% recycled polyamide, while the back is made of up to 75% recycled polypropylene.

Indicators of life cycle

IndicatorDirectionUnit Production
A1-A3
Transport
A4
Installation
A5
Maintenance
B2
Repair
B3
Replacement
B4
De-construction
C1
Transport
C2
Waste processing
C3
Disposal
C4
Recycling Potential
D
Input
  • 156.4
  • 0.3944
  • 0.02166
  • 19.88
  • 0.9053
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0.06683
  • 0.1807
  • 0.02713
  • -97.99
Input
  • 28.17
  • 0
  • -28.17
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
Input
  • 184.5
  • 0.3944
  • -28.15
  • 19.88
  • 0.9053
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0.06683
  • 0.1807
  • 0.02713
  • -97.99
Input
  • 659.4
  • 31.34
  • 1.202
  • 108.3
  • 4.876
  • 0
  • 0
  • 4.736
  • 4.34
  • 1.301
  • -33.67
Input
  • 273.6
  • 0
  • -3.574
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • -270.1
  • 0
  • 0
Input
  • 933
  • 31.34
  • -2.372
  • 108.3
  • 4.876
  • 0
  • 0
  • 4.736
  • -265.7
  • 1.301
  • -33.67
Input
  • 11.12
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
Input
  • 1.476
  • 0.0138
  • 0.0006808
  • 1.383
  • 0.06265
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0.002392
  • 0.004275
  • 0.0007108
  • 0.06053
Input
  • 0.4592
  • 0.04624
  • 0.004509
  • 0.3697
  • 0.01507
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0.00854
  • 0
  • 0.04201
  • -3.468
Input
  • 0.7307
  • 0.003568
  • 0.0006705
  • 0.8694
  • 0.00399
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0.0004987
  • 0.01547
  • 0.001174
  • -0.1208
Output
  • 0.4444
  • 0.001715
  • 0
  • 0.01871
  • 0.0008389
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0.0002415
  • 0
  • 5.115
  • -0.01188
Output
  • 13.97
  • 2.726
  • 4.776
  • 0.4238
  • 0.01731
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0.2264
  • 1.456
  • 0.1634
  • -1.246
Output
  • 0.002078
  • 0.0002139
  • 0
  • 0.0007213
  • 0.00003265
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0.00003229
  • 0
  • 0.000008388
  • -0.0000759
Output
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
Output
  • 0.8328
  • 0
  • 3.238
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 2.429
  • 0
  • 0
Output
  • 0.000006605
  • 0
  • 1.256
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 17.39
  • 0
  • 0
Output
  • 0.4604
  • 0
  • 1.07
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 11.17
  • 0
  • 0
Output
  • 6.966
  • 0
  • 16.19
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 169.1
  • 0
  • 0

IndicatorUnit Production
A1-A3
Transport
A4
Installation
A5
Maintenance
B2
Repair
B3
Replacement
B4
De-construction
C1
Transport
C2
Waste processing
C3
Disposal
C4
Recycling Potential
D
Abiotic depletion potential - fossil resources (ADPF)
  • 816.3
  • 31.34
  • 1.202
  • 108.1
  • 4.869
  • 0
  • 0
  • 4.736
  • 4.144
  • 1.3
  • -33.68
Abiotic depletion potential - non-fossil resources (ADPE)
  • 0.006915
  • 0.0000344
  • 0.000001936
  • 0.0000434
  • 0.000001689
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0.000008507
  • 0.000002808
  • 9.711E-7
  • -0.00004787
Acidification potential, Accumulated Exceedance (AP)
  • 0.3029
  • 0.008469
  • 0.0005431
  • 0.03219
  • 0.00144
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0.001284
  • 0.007093
  • 0.0004074
  • -0.01966
Global Warming Potential - biogenic (GWP-biogenic)
  • -6.902
  • 0.0008268
  • 7.963
  • 0.0361
  • 0.001618
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0.0001281
  • 4.295
  • 0.00006168
  • -0.003439
Global Warming Potential - fossil fuels (GWP-fossil)
  • 56.84
  • 2.015
  • 0.09606
  • 5.62
  • 0.2516
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0.3141
  • 18.3
  • 0.06172
  • -3.237
Global Warming Potential - total (GWP-total)
  • 50.01
  • 2.016
  • 8.059
  • 5.668
  • 0.2538
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0.3143
  • 22.6
  • 0.06179
  • -3.279
Global Warming Potential - land use and land use change (GWP-luluc)
  • 0.07264
  • 0.0005882
  • 0.00002756
  • 0.01266
  • 0.0005745
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0.0001098
  • 0.0001244
  • 0.00001741
  • -0.03861
  • 57.5
  • 2.016
  • 0.09609
  • 5.988
  • 0.2688
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0.3143
  • 21.52
  • 0.07937
  • -4.328
Eutrophication potential - freshwater (EP-freshwater)
  • 0.003125
  • 0.00001536
  • 8.751E-7
  • 0.0005475
  • 0.00002473
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0.000002466
  • 0.000006627
  • 6.45E-7
  • -0.0002291
Eutrophication potential - marine (EP-marine)
  • 0.06358
  • 0.002546
  • 0.0002112
  • 0.004311
  • 0.000191
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0.0003808
  • 0.003677
  • 0.000144
  • -0.005149
Eutrophication potential - terrestrial (EP-terrestrial)
  • 0.6803
  • 0.02816
  • 0.002221
  • 0.0522
  • 0.002318
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0.004211
  • 0.03624
  • 0.001597
  • -0.05436
Photochemical Ozone Creation Potential (POCP)
  • 0.2274
  • 0.009055
  • 0.0006016
  • 0.01353
  • 0.0005935
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0.001289
  • 0.008716
  • 0.0004582
  • -0.01952
Depletion potential of the stratospheric ozone layer (ODP)
  • 0.000003839
  • 4.655E-7
  • 1.753E-8
  • 4.392E-7
  • 1.953E-8
  • 0
  • 0
  • 7.16E-8
  • 6.675E-8
  • 1.745E-8
  • -0.07962
Water (user) deprivation potential (WDP)
  • 1.545E+4
  • 24.04
  • 1.694
  • 1506
  • 66.97
  • 0
  • 0
  • 4.518
  • 1.212
  • 3.197
  • -83.42

IndicatorUnit Production
A1-A3
Transport
A4
Installation
A5
Maintenance
B2
Repair
B3
Replacement
B4
De-construction
C1
Transport
C2
Waste processing
C3
Disposal
C4
Recycling Potential
D
1This impact category deals mainly with the eventual impact of low dose ionizing radiation on human health of the nuclear fuel cycle. It does not consider effects due to possible nuclear accidents, occupational exposure nor due to radioactive waste disposal in underground facilities. Potential ionizing radiation from the soil, from radon and from some construction materials is also not measured by this indicator.
2The results of this environmental impact indicator shall be used with care as the uncertainties on these results are high or as there is limited experiences with the indicator.
Potential Human exposure efficiency relative to U235 (IRP) 1
  • 2.256
  • 0.1369
  • 0.004891
  • 0.8896
  • 0.04033
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0.0207
  • 0.008899
  • 0.005261
  • -0.09213
Potential incidence of disease due to PM emissions (PM) 2
  • 0.00000379
  • 1.773E-7
  • 7.352E-9
  • 1.141E-7
  • 4.749E-9
  • 0
  • 0
  • 2.261E-8
  • 4.032E-8
  • 7.283E-9
  • -7.236E-7
Potential Soil quality index (SQP) 2
  • 355.8
  • 35.95
  • 0.7923
  • 25.32
  • 1.131
  • 0
  • 0
  • 3.265
  • 0.6083
  • 2.853
  • -105.8
Potential Comparative Toxic Unit for humans - non-cancer effects (HTP-nc) 2
  • 0.000001623
  • 2.217E-8
  • 3.742E-9
  • 8.809E-8
  • 3.369E-9
  • 0
  • 0
  • 3.769E-9
  • 4.234E-8
  • 9.74E-10
  • 1.427E-7
Potential Comparative Toxic Unit for humans - cancer effects (HTP-c) 2
  • 1.618E-7
  • 0
  • 8.2E-11
  • 2.793E-9
  • 9.7E-11
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 1.402E-9
  • 3.2E-11
  • -1.187E-8
Potential Comparative Toxic Unit for ecosystems (ETP-fw) 2
  • 2204
  • 22.92
  • 1.515
  • 86.63
  • 3.84
  • 0
  • 0
  • 3.488
  • 35.39
  • 0.8717
  • -204.5