Close Go back Collapse all sections
Process Data set: Pillo armchair, ash (en) en

Key Data Set Information
Location SE
Geographical representativeness description Worldwide
Reference year 2024
Name
Pillo armchair, ash
Technical purpose of product or process The Pillo armchair is the latest addition to the Pillo product family and creates a complete family offer. With its high seating comfort, removable upholstery and a wide range of leg options, the armchair is both versatile and can be changed and easily maintained over time. The Pillo arm chair is suitable for all occasions, regardless of whether it is in a meeting room, at home for dinners, in hotel and restaurant environments, in the care sector or in the office. In addition, a subtle gap, a gap, is designed between the backrest and the seat that allows for easy cleaning.https://www.swedese.se/produkter/stolar/pillo-karmstol-traben The model studied in this declaration is Pillo armchair upholstered in polyester fabric with base in wooden legs ash, including packaging. This EPD includes the following variants: Pillo armchair, Ash Dining upholstered in polyester fabric, including packaging. Pillo armchair, wheelbase upholstered in polyester fabric, including packaging. Pillo armchair, 4-starbase upholstered in polyester fabric, including packaging. The key environmental indicators for these variants are presented on a table at page 11 of this declaration. If you are interested in the specific EPD-protocol for the variants, please contact us by info@swedese.se
Classification
Class name : Hierarchy level
  • EPDNorge: Furniture / Soft seating
General comment on data set Data quality: Specific data for the product composition are provided by the manufacturer. They represent the production of the declared product and were collected for EPD development in the year of study. Background data is based on registered EPDs according to EN 15804, Ostfold Research databases, ecoinvent and other LCA databases. The data quality of the raw materials in A1 is presented in the table below. Allocation: The allocation is made in accordance with the provisions of EN 15804. Incoming energy and water and waste production in-house is allocated equally among all products through mass allocation. Effects of primary production of recycled materials is allocated to the main product in which the material was used. The recycling process and transportation of the material is allocated to this analysis. Cut-off criteria: All major raw materials and all the essential energy is included. The production processes for raw materials and energy flows with very small amounts (less than 1%) are not included. These cut-off criteria do not apply for hazardous materials and substances.
Copyright Yes
Owner of data set
Quantitative reference
Reference flow(s)
Biogenic carbon content
  • Carbon content (biogenic): 1.7000000017 kg
  • Carbon content (biogenic) - packaging: 1.04166666675 kg
Time representativeness
Data set valid until 2029
Time representativeness description 2024-12-18 - 2029-12-18
Technological representativeness

Indicators of life cycle

IndicatorDirectionUnit Production
A1-A3
Transport
A4
Installation
A5
Maintenance
B2
Repair
B3
Replacement
B4
De-construction
C1
Transport
C2
Waste processing
C3
Disposal
C4
Recycling Potential
D
Input
  • 357.7
  • 0.1517
  • 0.008383
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0.07331
  • 0.09988
  • 0.02074
  • -54.82
Input
  • 70.02
  • 0
  • -17.69
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • -52.32
  • 0
  • 0
Input
  • 427.8
  • 0.1517
  • -17.69
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0.07331
  • -52.22
  • 0.02074
  • -54.82
Input
  • 9.6E+2
  • 10.6
  • 0.5092
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 5.121
  • 3.465
  • 0.9351
  • -20.37
Input
  • 98.12
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • -98.12
  • 0
  • 0
Input
  • 1058
  • 10.6
  • 0.5092
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 5.121
  • -94.65
  • 0.9351
  • -20.37
Input
  • 2.694
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
Input
  • 1.643
  • 0.005426
  • 0.000278
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0.002623
  • 0.002348
  • 0.0005412
  • 0.04058
Input
  • 4.006
  • 0.0194
  • 0.001146
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0.009377
  • 0
  • 0.04203
  • -1.738
Input
  • 1.062
  • 0.001133
  • 0.0002403
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0.0005477
  • 0.01151
  • 0.0008441
  • -0.0678
Output
  • 0.2954
  • 0.0005464
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0.0002641
  • 0
  • 3.461
  • -0.007609
Output
  • 10.77
  • 0.5153
  • 2.25
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0.2491
  • 0
  • 0.1071
  • -0.7722
Output
  • 0.007018
  • 0.00007217
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0.00003488
  • 0
  • 0.000005715
  • -0.00004184
Output
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
Output
  • 0.0942
  • 0
  • 2.093
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 1.51
  • 0
  • 0
Output
  • 0.2923
  • 0
  • 0.000003063
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 11.98
  • 0
  • 0
Output
  • 0.1901
  • 0
  • 0.1287
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 6.937
  • 0
  • 0
Output
  • 2.876
  • 0
  • 1.947
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 105
  • 0
  • 0

IndicatorUnit Production
A1-A3
Transport
A4
Installation
A5
Maintenance
B2
Repair
B3
Replacement
B4
De-construction
C1
Transport
C2
Waste processing
C3
Disposal
C4
Recycling Potential
D
Abiotic depletion potential - fossil resources (ADPF)
  • 1043
  • 10.59
  • 0.5092
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 5.121
  • 3.453
  • 0.9349
  • -20.38
Abiotic depletion potential - non-fossil resources (ADPE)
  • 0.001376
  • 0.00001936
  • 8.859E-7
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0.000009356
  • 0.000001582
  • 6.945E-7
  • -0.00002997
Acidification potential, Accumulated Exceedance (AP)
  • 0.2471
  • 0.002014
  • 0.0001724
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0.0009734
  • 0.006925
  • 0.0002955
  • -0.01191
Global Warming Potential - biogenic (GWP-biogenic)
  • -9.086
  • 0.00029
  • 3.819
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0.0001402
  • 7.317
  • 0.00003732
  • -0.002023
Global Warming Potential - fossil fuels (GWP-fossil)
  • 48.29
  • 0.7007
  • 0.0364
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0.3387
  • 7.124
  • 0.04648
  • -1.995
Global Warming Potential - total (GWP-total)
  • 39.54
  • 0.7013
  • 3.856
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0.3389
  • 14.44
  • 0.04653
  • -2.018
Global Warming Potential - land use and land use change (GWP-luluc)
  • 0.3365
  • 0.0002494
  • 0.00001204
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0.0001205
  • 0.00005343
  • 0.00001264
  • -0.02163
  • 49.55
  • 0.7013
  • 0.03641
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0.3389
  • 8.329
  • 0.04919
  • -2.697
Eutrophication potential - freshwater (EP-freshwater)
  • 0.002935
  • 0.000005598
  • 2.988E-7
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0.000002706
  • 0.00000357
  • 4.967E-7
  • -0.0001394
Eutrophication potential - marine (EP-marine)
  • 0.05277
  • 0.0003985
  • 0.00005701
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0.0001926
  • 0.003806
  • 0.0001039
  • -0.003067
Eutrophication potential - terrestrial (EP-terrestrial)
  • 0.5231
  • 0.004457
  • 0.0006171
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0.002154
  • 0.03677
  • 0.001153
  • -0.03232
Photochemical Ozone Creation Potential (POCP)
  • 0.1763
  • 0.001707
  • 0.0001774
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0.0008252
  • 0.008777
  • 0.0003305
  • -0.01184
Depletion potential of the stratospheric ozone layer (ODP)
  • 0.000004392
  • 1.587E-7
  • 7.684E-9
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 7.672E-8
  • 4.102E-8
  • 1.249E-8
  • -0.04444
Water (user) deprivation potential (WDP)
  • 3.793E+4
  • 10.25
  • 0.6453
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 4.953
  • 10.12
  • 2.56
  • -36.81

IndicatorUnit Production
A1-A3
Transport
A4
Installation
A5
Maintenance
B2
Repair
B3
Replacement
B4
De-construction
C1
Transport
C2
Waste processing
C3
Disposal
C4
Recycling Potential
D
1This impact category deals mainly with the eventual impact of low dose ionizing radiation on human health of the nuclear fuel cycle. It does not consider effects due to possible nuclear accidents, occupational exposure nor due to radioactive waste disposal in underground facilities. Potential ionizing radiation from the soil, from radon and from some construction materials is also not measured by this indicator.
2The results of this environmental impact indicator shall be used with care as the uncertainties on these results are high or as there is limited experiences with the indicator.
Potential Human exposure efficiency relative to U235 (IRP) 1
  • 13.8
  • 0.04631
  • 0.002179
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0.02238
  • 0.005628
  • 0.003807
  • -0.05075
Potential incidence of disease due to PM emissions (PM) 2
  • 0.000003842
  • 4.29E-8
  • 2.543E-9
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 2.074E-8
  • 3.407E-8
  • 5.214E-9
  • -4.195E-7
Potential Soil quality index (SQP) 2
  • 904.5
  • 7.411
  • 0.3416
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 3.582
  • 0.4149
  • 2.098
  • -59.19
Potential Comparative Toxic Unit for humans - non-cancer effects (HTP-nc) 2
  • 0.000001419
  • 8.58E-9
  • 8.53E-10
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 4.147E-9
  • 2.789E-8
  • 7.66E-10
  • 9.931E-8
Potential Comparative Toxic Unit for humans - cancer effects (HTP-c) 2
  • 1.376E-7
  • 0
  • 2E-11
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 8.04E-10
  • 2.5E-11
  • -7.532E-9
Potential Comparative Toxic Unit for ecosystems (ETP-fw) 2
  • 2069
  • 7.854
  • 0.679
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 3.796
  • 23.51
  • 0.6579
  • -124.6