Close Go back Collapse all sections
Process Data set: BIO DILE™ joint filler from GIND AS (en) en

Key Data Set Information
Location NO
Geographical representativeness description Norway, Sweden and Germany.
Reference year 2024
Name
BIO DILE™ joint filler from GIND AS
Use advice for data set This product system includes production of the joint filler out of bio-based bitumen and aggregates (modules A1-A3), transport of the finished goods to Norway Sweden, and Germany (module A4), and end-of-life scenario (modules C1-C4). The benefits for the next life cycle are accounted for in module D.
Technical purpose of product or process The BIO DILE™ line is a draining joint filler for stones and similar. The blend of biogenic binder component and bitumen is formulated to comply with EN 12591 'Bitumen and bituminous binders'. Applications can be specified for the customer's use. This EPD covers the products 'BIO DILE™ Draining', 'BIO DILE™ Solid', and 'BIO DILE™ Compact'.
Classification
Class name : Hierarchy level
  • EPDNorge: Construction / Technical-chemical building materials products
General comment on data set Data quality: Specific data for the product composition are provided by the manufacturer. The data represent the production of the declared product and were collected for EPD development in the year of study. Background data is based on EPDs according to EN 15804 and different LCA databases. The data quality of the raw materials in A1 is presented in the table below. Allocation: The allocation is made in accordance with the provisions of EN 15804. Incoming energy and water and waste production in-house is allocated equally among all products through mass allocation. Effects of primary production of recycled materials is allocated to the main product in which the material was used. The recycling process and transportation of the material is allocated to this analysis. Cut-off criteria: All major raw materials and all the essential energy is included. The production processes for raw materials and energy flows with very small amounts (less than 1%) are not included. These cut-off criteria do not apply for hazardous materials and substances.
Copyright Yes
Owner of data set
Quantitative reference
Reference flow(s)
Biogenic carbon content
  • Carbon content (biogenic): 1.0 kg
  • Carbon content (biogenic) - packaging: 1.0 kg
Time representativeness
Data set valid until 2029
Time representativeness description 2024-10-08 - 2029-10-08
Technological representativeness
Technology description including background system CarbonBind biogenic bitumen component is used in percentage between 4% and 40% of the total weight. The BIO DILE™ joint filler is a long-lasting product, with virtually unlimited lifetime.

Indicators of life cycle

IndicatorDirectionUnit Raw material supply
A1
Transport
A2
Manufacturing
A3
Transport
A4
Installation
A5
De-construction
C1
Transport
C2
Waste processing
C3
Disposal
C4
Recycling Potential
D
Input
  • 0.5007
  • 0.008634
  • 1.1
  • 0.03043
  • 0.08285
  • 0.00009816
  • 0.00181
  • 0.01135
  • 0
  • -0.2222
Input
  • 2.752
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • -2.752
  • 0
  • 0
Input
  • 3.253
  • 0.008634
  • 1.1
  • 0.03043
  • 0.08285
  • 0.00009816
  • 0.00181
  • -2.741
  • 0
  • -0.2222
Input
  • 1.161
  • 0.5992
  • 0.5939
  • 2.176
  • 0.2427
  • 0.01815
  • 0.1265
  • 0.02206
  • 0
  • -4.008
Input
  • 0.7867
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • -0.7474
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
Input
  • 1.948
  • 0.5992
  • 0.5939
  • 2.176
  • -0.5047
  • 0.01815
  • 0.1265
  • 0.02206
  • 0
  • -4.008
Input
  • 0.1716
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0.00858
  • 0.000008912
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
Input
  • 0.006833
  • 0.0003072
  • 0.001035
  • 0.001083
  • 0.0004714
  • 0.000002415
  • 0.00006476
  • 0
  • 0
  • -0.002429
Input
  • 0.003087
  • 0.001083
  • 0.003251
  • 0.003821
  • 0.0005891
  • 0.00003554
  • 0.0002316
  • 0
  • 0
  • -0.001008
Input
  • 0.001549
  • 0.00006355
  • 0.009158
  • 0.0002274
  • 0.0005567
  • 9.34E-7
  • 0.00001352
  • 0.00003778
  • 0
  • -0.001968
Output
  • 0.0009907
  • 0.00003098
  • 0.0005533
  • 0.0001112
  • 0.00008478
  • 5.342E-7
  • 0.000006522
  • 0.000002203
  • 0
  • -0.001605
Output
  • 0.01458
  • 0.02639
  • 0.007705
  • 0.1017
  • 0.03183
  • 0.00002149
  • 0.00615
  • 0.00006959
  • 0
  • -0.005202
Output
  • 0.00001056
  • 0.000004079
  • 0.000004123
  • 0.00001484
  • 0.000001741
  • 1.26E-7
  • 8.614E-7
  • 2.332E-7
  • 0
  • -0.00002945
Output
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
Output
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0.0006904
  • 0
  • 0.06229
  • 0.000008751
  • 0
  • 1
  • 0
  • 0
Output
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0.001305
  • 0
  • 0.00006647
  • 2.713E-8
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
Output
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0.000781
  • 0
  • 0.0000409
  • 9.302E-8
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
Output
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0.01182
  • 0
  • 0.0006188
  • 0.000001407
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0

IndicatorUnit Raw material supply
A1
Transport
A2
Manufacturing
A3
Transport
A4
Installation
A5
De-construction
C1
Transport
C2
Waste processing
C3
Disposal
C4
Recycling Potential
D
Abiotic depletion potential - fossil resources (ADPF)
  • 1.946
  • 0.5992
  • 0.5938
  • 2.176
  • 0.2819
  • 0.01815
  • 0.1264
  • 0.02205
  • 0
  • -4.008
Abiotic depletion potential - non-fossil resources (ADPE)
  • 0.000001245
  • 0.000001122
  • 5.829E-7
  • 0.000003859
  • 3.627E-7
  • 2.023E-9
  • 2.31E-7
  • 9.011E-9
  • 0
  • -3.783E-7
Acidification potential, Accumulated Exceedance (AP)
  • 0.0003283
  • 0.0001965
  • 0.0002044
  • 0.0006262
  • 0.00007229
  • 0.00001379
  • 0.00002404
  • 0.000005748
  • 0
  • -0.0004327
Global Warming Potential - biogenic (GWP-biogenic)
  • -0.322
  • 0.0000166
  • 0.0002681
  • 0.00005893
  • 0.0002021
  • 2.472E-7
  • 0.000003461
  • 0.3257
  • 0
  • -0.000144
Global Warming Potential - fossil fuels (GWP-fossil)
  • 0.07308
  • 0.04015
  • 0.04342
  • 0.145
  • 0.0175
  • 0.001319
  • 0.008363
  • 0.00071
  • 0
  • -0.04268
Global Warming Potential - total (GWP-total)
  • -0.2487
  • 0.04018
  • 0.04372
  • 0.1451
  • 0.01772
  • 0.001319
  • 0.00837
  • 0.3264
  • 0
  • -0.04286
Global Warming Potential - land use and land use change (GWP-luluc)
  • 0.000266
  • 0.00001565
  • 0.00003034
  • 0.00005348
  • 0.00001862
  • 1.039E-7
  • 0.000002977
  • 9.826E-7
  • 0
  • -0.00003407
  • 0.07675
  • 0.04018
  • 0.04363
  • 0.1451
  • 0.0177
  • 0.001319
  • 0.008369
  • 0.000711
  • 0
  • -0.04285
Eutrophication potential - freshwater (EP-freshwater)
  • 0.000003633
  • 3.192E-7
  • 6.58E-7
  • 0.000001129
  • 2.967E-7
  • 4.8E-9
  • 6.682E-8
  • 4.487E-8
  • 0
  • -8.921E-7
Eutrophication potential - marine (EP-marine)
  • 0.00006107
  • 0.00004325
  • 0.00005499
  • 0.0001358
  • 0.00001752
  • 0.000006088
  • 0.000004756
  • 0.000001684
  • 0
  • -0.00008205
Eutrophication potential - terrestrial (EP-terrestrial)
  • 0.0006652
  • 0.0004824
  • 0.0006138
  • 0.001514
  • 0.0001792
  • 0.0000668
  • 0.0000532
  • 0.0000194
  • 0
  • -0.0009325
Photochemical Ozone Creation Potential (POCP)
  • 0.0003216
  • 0.000154
  • 0.0001986
  • 0.0005008
  • 0.00006372
  • 0.00001837
  • 0.00002038
  • 0.000005195
  • 0
  • -0.0005127
Depletion potential of the stratospheric ozone layer (ODP)
  • 9.259E-9
  • 8.966E-9
  • 8.065E-9
  • 3.266E-8
  • 3.178E-9
  • 2.85E-10
  • 1.894E-9
  • 1.4E-10
  • 0
  • -7.469E-8
Water (user) deprivation potential (WDP)
  • 43.57
  • 0.581
  • 15
  • 2.035
  • 3.215
  • 0.003856
  • 0.1223
  • 2.434
  • 0
  • -32.5

IndicatorUnit Raw material supply
A1
Transport
A2
Manufacturing
A3
Transport
A4
Installation
A5
De-construction
C1
Transport
C2
Waste processing
C3
Disposal
C4
Recycling Potential
D
1This impact category deals mainly with the eventual impact of low dose ionizing radiation on human health of the nuclear fuel cycle. It does not consider effects due to possible nuclear accidents, occupational exposure nor due to radioactive waste disposal in underground facilities. Potential ionizing radiation from the soil, from radon and from some construction materials is also not measured by this indicator.
2The results of this environmental impact indicator shall be used with care as the uncertainties on these results are high or as there is limited experiences with the indicator.
Potential Human exposure efficiency relative to U235 (IRP) 1
  • 0.01743
  • 0.002617
  • 0.003649
  • 0.009505
  • 0.001746
  • 0.00007777
  • 0.0005527
  • 0.00037
  • 0
  • -0.02011
Potential incidence of disease due to PM emissions (PM) 2
  • 2.906E-9
  • 2.324E-9
  • 2.973E-9
  • 8.639E-9
  • 9.33E-10
  • 3.65E-10
  • 5.12E-10
  • 9.2E-11
  • 0
  • -2.723E-9
Potential Soil quality index (SQP) 2
  • 0.9372
  • 0.3863
  • 0.1139
  • 1.471
  • 0.1642
  • 0.002303
  • 0.08845
  • 0.01247
  • 0
  • -0.9032
Potential Comparative Toxic Unit for humans - non-cancer effects (HTP-nc) 2
  • 1.309E-9
  • 4.97E-10
  • 8.04E-10
  • 1.754E-9
  • 2.31E-10
  • 9E-12
  • 1.02E-10
  • 1.4E-11
  • 0
  • -6.26E-10
Potential Comparative Toxic Unit for humans - cancer effects (HTP-c) 2
  • 1.3E-10
  • 0
  • 3.1E-11
  • 0
  • 8E-12
  • 0
  • 0
  • 1E-12
  • 0
  • -2.5E-11
Potential Comparative Toxic Unit for ecosystems (ETP-fw) 2
  • 1.76
  • 0.443
  • 0.6905
  • 1.598
  • 0.238
  • 0.009918
  • 0.09374
  • 0.01563
  • 0
  • -2.545