Close Go back Collapse all sections
Process Data set: Profim Sorriso 10V (en) en

Key Data Set Information
Location PL
Geographical representativeness description Worldwide
Reference year 2024
Name
Profim Sorriso 10V
Technical purpose of product or process Designed by Jaroslaw Szymanski of Studio 1:1, the name of the armchair means 'smile' in Italian. It is distinguished by an elegant, oval shell shape and expressive and precise stitching. It is an ideal solution for modern reception areas, hotels or cafés, where comfort of use is important. The model studied in this declaration is the Profim Sorriso 10V upholstered in the Xtreme fabric from Camira, including packaging. Key environmental indicators for other models within the family, as well as applicable product collection options, are presented in a table on page 12 of this declaration.
Classification
Class name : Hierarchy level
  • EPDNorge: Furniture / Soft seating
General comment on data set Data quality: Specific data for the product composition are provided by the manufacturer. They represent the production of the declared product and were collected for EPD development in the year of study. Background data is based on registered EPDs according to EN 15804, Ostfold Research databases, ecoinvent and other LCA databases. The data quality of the raw materials in A1 is presented in the table below. Allocation: The allocation is made in accordance with the provisions of EN 15804. Incoming energy and water and waste production in-house is allocated equally among all products through mass allocation. Effects of primary production of recycled materials is allocated to the main product in which the material was used. The recycling process and transportation of the material is allocated to this analysis. Cut-off criteria: All major raw materials and all the essential energy is included. The production processes for raw materials and energy flows with very small amounts (less than 1%) are not included. These cut-off criteria do not apply for hazardous materials and substances.
Copyright Yes
Owner of data set
Quantitative reference
Reference flow(s)
Biogenic carbon content
  • Carbon content (biogenic): 4.71698113E-4 kg
  • Carbon content (biogenic) - packaging: 2.058560447398 kg
Time representativeness
Data set valid until 2029
Time representativeness description "2024-07-08" - "2029-07-08"
Technological representativeness
Technology description including background system - frame: metal wire with cross section fi 16 mm - Colour variants: MetallicPro, Chrome and Black (RAL 9005) - glides: teflon glides or felt glides - seat (cushion): cold molded foam - density 85 kg/m3 - shell: metal frame; cold molded foam - density 80 kg/m3 - possibility of mixing colours of the same fabric on shell and seat cushion

Indicators of life cycle

IndicatorDirectionUnit Production
A1-A3
Transport
A4
Installation
A5
Maintenance
B2
Repair
B3
Replacement
B4
De-construction
C1
Transport
C2
Waste processing
C3
Disposal
C4
Recycling Potential
D
Input
  • 1.5E+2
  • 0.3222
  • 0.0174
  • 19.88
  • 0.9053
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0.0546
  • 0.159
  • 0.03098
  • -63.08
Input
  • 26.24
  • 0
  • -26.22
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • -0.01412
  • 0
  • 0
Input
  • 176.3
  • 0.3222
  • -26.21
  • 19.88
  • 0.9053
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0.0546
  • 0.1449
  • 0.03098
  • -63.08
Input
  • 695.7
  • 25.6
  • 1.039
  • 108.3
  • 4.876
  • 0
  • 0
  • 3.869
  • 5.075
  • 1.39
  • -29.23
Input
  • 182
  • 0
  • -3.687
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • -178.3
  • 0
  • 0
Input
  • 877.7
  • 25.6
  • -2.648
  • 108.3
  • 4.876
  • 0
  • 0
  • 3.869
  • -173.2
  • 1.39
  • -29.23
Input
  • 6.903
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • -0.0003736
Input
  • 0.645
  • 0.01127
  • 0.0005713
  • 1.383
  • 0.06265
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0.001954
  • 0.003729
  • 0.000805
  • 0.07162
Input
  • 0.2192
  • 0.03778
  • 0.002322
  • 0.3697
  • 0.01507
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0.006976
  • 0
  • 0.04701
  • -1.244
Input
  • 0.8685
  • 0.002915
  • 0.0004922
  • 0.8694
  • 0.00399
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0.0004074
  • 0.01735
  • 0.001258
  • -0.07899
Output
  • 0.3444
  • 0.001401
  • 0
  • 0.01871
  • 0.0008389
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0.0001973
  • 0
  • 5.153
  • -0.01239
Output
  • 11.64
  • 2.227
  • 4.547
  • 0.4238
  • 0.01731
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0.1849
  • 0.03
  • 0.1599
  • -1.171
Output
  • 0.001642
  • 0.0001748
  • 0
  • 0.0007213
  • 0.00003265
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0.00002638
  • 0
  • 0.000008502
  • -0.00004602
Output
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
Output
  • 0.8328
  • 0
  • 4.187
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 2.584
  • 0
  • -0.0000503
Output
  • 0.000006605
  • 0
  • 0.001829
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 13.56
  • 0
  • -0.000006067
Output
  • 0.4604
  • 0
  • 0.2543
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 7.876
  • 0
  • -0.00003819
Output
  • 6.966
  • 0
  • 3.847
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 119.2
  • 0
  • -0.0005777

IndicatorUnit Production
A1-A3
Transport
A4
Installation
A5
Maintenance
B2
Repair
B3
Replacement
B4
De-construction
C1
Transport
C2
Waste processing
C3
Disposal
C4
Recycling Potential
D
Abiotic depletion potential - fossil resources (ADPF)
  • 877.5
  • 25.6
  • 1.039
  • 108.1
  • 4.869
  • 0
  • 0
  • 3.869
  • 5.053
  • 1.39
  • -29.24
Abiotic depletion potential - non-fossil resources (ADPE)
  • 0.001595
  • 0.00002811
  • 0.000001793
  • 0.0000434
  • 0.000001689
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0.00000695
  • 0.000002343
  • 0.000001032
  • -0.00007594
Acidification potential, Accumulated Exceedance (AP)
  • 0.291
  • 0.006918
  • 0.0003505
  • 0.03219
  • 0.00144
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0.001049
  • 0.01018
  • 0.0004392
  • -0.01755
Global Warming Potential - biogenic (GWP-biogenic)
  • -6.745
  • 0.0006755
  • 7.548
  • 0.0361
  • 0.001618
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0.0001046
  • 1.825
  • 0.00005639
  • -0.002726
Global Warming Potential - fossil fuels (GWP-fossil)
  • 56.82
  • 1.646
  • 0.07993
  • 5.62
  • 0.2516
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0.2566
  • 12.78
  • 0.06932
  • -2.986
Global Warming Potential - total (GWP-total)
  • 50.14
  • 1.647
  • 7.628
  • 5.668
  • 0.2538
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0.2568
  • 14.6
  • 0.06939
  • -3.013
Global Warming Potential - land use and land use change (GWP-luluc)
  • 0.06378
  • 0.0004805
  • 0.0000244
  • 0.01266
  • 0.0005745
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0.00008969
  • 0.00008142
  • 0.0000188
  • -0.02502
  • 57.24
  • 1.647
  • 0.07995
  • 5.988
  • 0.2688
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0.2568
  • 14.78
  • 0.0738
  • -4.138
Eutrophication potential - freshwater (EP-freshwater)
  • 0.003308
  • 0.00001255
  • 6.07E-7
  • 0.0005475
  • 0.00002473
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0.000002015
  • 0.000005117
  • 7.379E-7
  • -0.0002062
Eutrophication potential - marine (EP-marine)
  • 0.06428
  • 0.00208
  • 0.0001217
  • 0.004311
  • 0.000191
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0.0003111
  • 0.005638
  • 0.0001544
  • -0.004248
Eutrophication potential - terrestrial (EP-terrestrial)
  • 0.6082
  • 0.02301
  • 0.001255
  • 0.0522
  • 0.002318
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0.00344
  • 0.05411
  • 0.001715
  • -0.04463
Photochemical Ozone Creation Potential (POCP)
  • 0.2119
  • 0.007397
  • 0.0003622
  • 0.01353
  • 0.0005935
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0.001053
  • 0.01289
  • 0.0004912
  • -0.01713
Depletion potential of the stratospheric ozone layer (ODP)
  • 0.000002927
  • 3.803E-7
  • 1.566E-8
  • 4.392E-7
  • 1.953E-8
  • 0
  • 0
  • 5.849E-8
  • 6.251E-8
  • 1.857E-8
  • -0.05073
Water (user) deprivation potential (WDP)
  • 1.423E+4
  • 19.64
  • 1.392
  • 1506
  • 66.97
  • 0
  • 0
  • 3.691
  • 14.94
  • 3.842
  • -5.579

IndicatorUnit Production
A1-A3
Transport
A4
Installation
A5
Maintenance
B2
Repair
B3
Replacement
B4
De-construction
C1
Transport
C2
Waste processing
C3
Disposal
C4
Recycling Potential
D
1This impact category deals mainly with the eventual impact of low dose ionizing radiation on human health of the nuclear fuel cycle. It does not consider effects due to possible nuclear accidents, occupational exposure nor due to radioactive waste disposal in underground facilities. Potential ionizing radiation from the soil, from radon and from some construction materials is also not measured by this indicator.
2The results of this environmental impact indicator shall be used with care as the uncertainties on these results are high or as there is limited experiences with the indicator.
Potential Human exposure efficiency relative to U235 (IRP) 1
  • 1.688
  • 0.1119
  • 0.004454
  • 0.8896
  • 0.04033
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0.01691
  • 0.008372
  • 0.005657
  • -0.05564
Potential incidence of disease due to PM emissions (PM) 2
  • 0.000004302
  • 1.449E-7
  • 5.202E-9
  • 1.141E-7
  • 4.749E-9
  • 0
  • 0
  • 1.847E-8
  • 4.549E-8
  • 7.745E-9
  • -5.382E-7
Potential Soil quality index (SQP) 2
  • 215.2
  • 29.37
  • 0.7326
  • 25.32
  • 1.131
  • 0
  • 0
  • 2.667
  • 0.6183
  • 3.105
  • -68.07
Potential Comparative Toxic Unit for humans - non-cancer effects (HTP-nc) 2
  • 0.000001564
  • 1.811E-8
  • 1.715E-9
  • 8.809E-8
  • 3.369E-9
  • 0
  • 0
  • 3.079E-9
  • 3.53E-8
  • 1.139E-9
  • 1.816E-7
Potential Comparative Toxic Unit for humans - cancer effects (HTP-c) 2
  • 1.527E-7
  • 0
  • 4.1E-11
  • 2.793E-9
  • 9.7E-11
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 1.143E-9
  • 3.8E-11
  • -1.205E-8
Potential Comparative Toxic Unit for ecosystems (ETP-fw) 2
  • 2733
  • 18.72
  • 1.373
  • 86.63
  • 3.84
  • 0
  • 0
  • 2.85
  • 32.27
  • 0.979
  • -186