Close Go back Collapse all sections
Process Data set: Nilo Chair (en) en

Key Data Set Information
Location SE
Geographical representativeness description Mainly Europe, but is available world wide.
Reference year 2024
Name
Nilo Chair
Use advice for data set The wooden seat shell is bought as a premanufactured component. The upholstering is done at Kinnarps' production site in Skillingaryd, where the fabric is also processed. Certain steel components are manufactured at Kinnarps' production site in Jönköping and some are purchased as premanufactured components. Final assembly of the product is done at Kinnarps' production site in Kinnarp. The flow chart below illustrates the system boundaries of the analysis.
Technical purpose of product or process Nilo wooden shell chair with 4-legged steel underframe with castors. Armrests are available as options. Felt pads and connectors are available as options for Nilo variants with 4-legged underframe and sledge underframe. Nilo is a practical and sustainable wooden shell chair in several versions that form a complete family of chairs. Thanks to its simple shape, it has the flexibility to fit into many different spaces, and is ideal for e.g. dining rooms, cafés and meeting rooms. Read more: https://www.kinnarps.com/products/seating/chairs/nilo/ Nilo is made from renewable FSC®-certified wood, which guarantees responsible forestry with respect to both people and the environment. The chair is made of a few parts, all of which you can either recycle, separate or replace - making it a circular and sustainable choice. Nilo is available with wooden seat shell, with or without upholstered seat cushion or fully upholstered. The back has a natural springiness that counteracts static sitting and increases blood circulation. The contoured seat provides a comfortable seating, as the user’s weight is distributed over a larger area. The seat shell is available in durable laminate, providing durability in especially tough spaces. Nilo is available with handles at the back, which makes it easy to move and support yourself on. The chair is stackable and available with castors, offering flexible environments and space efficient solutions. It can also be hung on tables, which frees up floor space and facilitates cleaning. This EPD includes the following variants: Nilo 4-legged with wooden seat shell, Nilo 4-legged with upholstered seat cushion in two different fabrics; 100 % recycled polyester fabric or wool-blend fabric, Nilo 4-legged with completely upholstered seat shell, one variant in 100 % recycled polyester, one in polyester fabric and one in wool-blend fabric, Nilo with sledge underframe. Included options are: Armrests, Felt pads, Connectors.
Classification
Class name : Hierarchy level
  • EPDNorge: Furniture / Soft seating
General comment on data set Data quality: Specific data for the product composition are provided by the manufacturer. They represent the production of the declared product and were collected for EPD development in the year of study. Background data is based on registered EPDs according to EN 15804, Ostfold Research databases, ecoinvent and other LCA databases. The data quality of the raw materials in A1 is presented in the table below. Specific data for the manufacturing processes (product stage A3) refers to the year 2020. All other specific data is from year of study. Allocation: The allocation is made in accordance with the provisions of EN 15804. Incoming energy and water and waste production in-house is allocated equally among all products through mass allocation. Effects of primary production of recycled materials is allocated to the main product in which the material was used. The recycling process and transportation of the material is allocated to this analysis. Cut-off criteria: All major raw materials and all the essential energy is included. The production processes for raw materials and energy flows with very small amounts (less than 1%) are not included. These cut-off criteria do not apply for hazardous materials and substances.
Copyright Yes
Owner of data set
Quantitative reference
Reference flow(s)
Biogenic carbon content
  • Carbon content (biogenic): 1.032272728305 kg
  • Carbon content (biogenic) - packaging: 0.0 kg
Time representativeness
Data set valid until 2029
Time representativeness description "2024-01-08" - "2029-01-08"
Technological representativeness
Technology description including background system Certifications: Swedish Möbelfakta, Nilo is FSC®-certified (FSC®C010544) in all executions. Fulfilled technical standards: EN 16139:2013 Furniture - Strength, durability and safety - Requirements for non-domestic seating, EN 1729 Furniture - Chairs and tables for educational institutions. Fulfilled fire requirements, for upholstered variants: EN 1021-1 Assessment of the ignitability of upholstered furniture – Part 1: Ignition source smouldering cigarette, with Kinnarps standard fabrics, EN 1021-2 Assessment of the ignitability of upholstered furniture – Part 2: Ignition source match flame equivalent, with Kinnarps standard fabrics.

Indicators of life cycle

IndicatorDirectionUnit Production
A1-A3
Transport
A4
Installation
A5
Maintenance
B2
Repair
B3
Replacement
B4
De-construction
C1
Transport
C2
Waste processing
C3
Disposal
C4
Recycling Potential
D
Input
  • 138
  • 0.05689
  • 0
  • 0.6211
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0.007715
  • 0.01897
  • 0.007683
  • -18.22
Input
  • 31.77
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • -31.77
  • 0
  • 0
Input
  • 169.8
  • 0.05689
  • 0
  • 0.6211
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0.007715
  • -31.75
  • 0.007678
  • -18.22
Input
  • 219.6
  • 1.256
  • 0
  • 4.572
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0.6133
  • 0.4548
  • 0.4014
  • -8.691
Input
  • 15.79
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • -15.79
  • 0
  • 0
Input
  • 235.5
  • 1.256
  • 0
  • 4.572
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0.6133
  • -15.34
  • 0.4014
  • -8.691
Input
  • 0.4809
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
Input
  • 0.2436
  • 0.001848
  • 0
  • 0.04979
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0.0002699
  • 0.0004185
  • 0.0002029
  • 0.02187
Input
  • 0.3423
  • 0.006372
  • 0
  • 0.04907
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0.0009044
  • 0
  • 0.01756
  • -0.3249
Input
  • 0.1794
  • 0.0005138
  • 0
  • 0.7845
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0.00006979
  • 0.001305
  • 0.0003619
  • -0.02282
Output
  • 0.1371
  • 0.0001762
  • 0
  • 0.0008639
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0.00003356
  • 0
  • 1.551
  • -0.00373
Output
  • 4.728
  • 0.1868
  • 0
  • 0.05548
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0.05331
  • 0.025
  • 0.01971
  • -0.3505
Output
  • 0.00118
  • 0.000005031
  • 0
  • 0.00002677
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0.000004188
  • 0
  • 0.000002459
  • -0.00001313
Output
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
Output
  • 1.234
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0.7856
  • 0
  • 0
Output
  • 0.000005122
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 5.051
  • 0
  • 0
Output
  • 0.4842
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 2.34
  • 0
  • 0
Output
  • 7.326
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 35.4
  • 0
  • 0

IndicatorUnit Production
A1-A3
Transport
A4
Installation
A5
Maintenance
B2
Repair
B3
Replacement
B4
De-construction
C1
Transport
C2
Waste processing
C3
Disposal
C4
Recycling Potential
D
Abiotic depletion potential - fossil resources (ADPF)
  • 233.6
  • 1.256
  • 0
  • 4.567
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0.6133
  • 0.4522
  • 0.4013
  • -8.694
Abiotic depletion potential - non-fossil resources (ADPE)
  • 0.0002998
  • 0.000007214
  • 0
  • 0.000007479
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 6.728E-7
  • 2.789E-7
  • 3.023E-7
  • -0.00001393
Acidification potential, Accumulated Exceedance (AP)
  • 0.07749
  • 0.0004162
  • 0
  • 0.00156
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0.0001216
  • 0.0006284
  • 0.0001245
  • -0.005092
Global Warming Potential - biogenic (GWP-biogenic)
  • -3.457
  • 0.0001005
  • 0
  • 0.001682
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0.00001617
  • 3.786
  • 0.00001328
  • -0.0007963
Global Warming Potential - fossil fuels (GWP-fossil)
  • 14.67
  • 0.05933
  • 0
  • 0.2673
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0.03776
  • 1.179
  • 0.01791
  • -0.8924
Global Warming Potential - total (GWP-total)
  • 11.24
  • 0.05953
  • 0
  • 0.2694
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0.03778
  • 4.964
  • 0.01793
  • -0.9004
Global Warming Potential - land use and land use change (GWP-luluc)
  • 0.03539
  • 0.00009253
  • 0
  • 0.0004351
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0.0000115
  • 0.00001119
  • 0.000005314
  • -0.00723
  • 16.35
  • 0.05952
  • 0
  • 0.2693
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0.03778
  • 1.152
  • 0.01867
  • -1.241
Eutrophication potential - freshwater (EP-freshwater)
  • 0.0007809
  • 0.000002179
  • 0
  • 0.00002137
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 3.004E-7
  • 0.000001014
  • 1.809E-7
  • -0.00006041
Eutrophication potential - marine (EP-marine)
  • 0.01642
  • 0.0001101
  • 0
  • 0.0002476
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0.00002662
  • 0.0002918
  • 0.00004428
  • -0.001252
Eutrophication potential - terrestrial (EP-terrestrial)
  • 0.1835
  • 0.001231
  • 0
  • 0.002879
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0.0002969
  • 0.003092
  • 0.0004906
  • -0.01312
Photochemical Ozone Creation Potential (POCP)
  • 0.06304
  • 0.0004505
  • 0
  • 0.000905
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0.0001166
  • 0.0007743
  • 0.000141
  • -0.005079
Depletion potential of the stratospheric ozone layer (ODP)
  • 0.000001252
  • 1.224E-8
  • 0
  • 2.37E-8
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 9.104E-9
  • 5.318E-9
  • 5.417E-9
  • -0.01464
Water (user) deprivation potential (WDP)
  • 4293
  • 3.72
  • 0
  • 81.84
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0.4702
  • 1.366
  • 0.841
  • 0.08573

IndicatorUnit Production
A1-A3
Transport
A4
Installation
A5
Maintenance
B2
Repair
B3
Replacement
B4
De-construction
C1
Transport
C2
Waste processing
C3
Disposal
C4
Recycling Potential
D
1This impact category deals mainly with the eventual impact of low dose ionizing radiation on human health of the nuclear fuel cycle. It does not consider effects due to possible nuclear accidents, occupational exposure nor due to radioactive waste disposal in underground facilities. Potential ionizing radiation from the soil, from radon and from some construction materials is also not measured by this indicator.
2The results of this environmental impact indicator shall be used with care as the uncertainties on these results are high or as there is limited experiences with the indicator.
Potential Human exposure efficiency relative to U235 (IRP) 1
  • 1.835
  • 0.004102
  • 0
  • 0.0316
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0.00268
  • 0.00104
  • 0.001611
  • -0.01587
Potential incidence of disease due to PM emissions (PM) 2
  • 0.000001572
  • 1.377E-8
  • 0
  • 1.309E-8
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 3.468E-9
  • 8.589E-9
  • 2.264E-9
  • -1.577E-7
Potential Soil quality index (SQP) 2
  • 634.7
  • 2.341
  • 0
  • 1.276
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0.703
  • 0.08058
  • 0.8802
  • -19.64
Potential Comparative Toxic Unit for humans - non-cancer effects (HTP-nc) 2
  • 5.385E-7
  • 3.06E-9
  • 0
  • 1.642E-8
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 4.34E-10
  • 6.406E-9
  • 2.42E-10
  • 5.732E-8
Potential Comparative Toxic Unit for humans - cancer effects (HTP-c) 2
  • 6.607E-8
  • 0
  • 0
  • 7.39E-10
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 2.36E-10
  • 9E-12
  • -3.612E-9
Potential Comparative Toxic Unit for ecosystems (ETP-fw) 2
  • 470.4
  • 1.833
  • 0
  • 4.947
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0.4484
  • 2.695
  • 0.2442
  • -54.18