Close Go back Collapse all sections
Process Data set: Hobas Sewer Pipe RO with FWC coupling DN400-800, PN1 & PN6, SN10000 (en) en

Key Data Set Information
Geographical representativeness description Europe
Reference year 2025
Name
Hobas Sewer Pipe RO with FWC coupling DN400-800, PN1 & PN6, SN10000
Technical purpose of product or process Filled (VO) Pipe, Hobas Diameter Series, DN400-800, PN1 & PN6, SN10000, Liner: Standard, Length: 6 m, Glass: E, Resin: Ortho, Liner Resin: Ortho, with FWC Coupling Glass: E, Resin: Ortho, Liner Resin: Ortho, Specifications and product details are presented here: https://www.amiblu.com/ A typical composition of the pipes covered by this EPD is as follows:
Classification
Class name : Hierarchy level
  • EPDNorge: Construction / Piping
General comment on data set Data quality: Specific data for the product compositions are used. In case of some raw materials, data from ecoinvent 3.6 were modified to better reflect the composition of specific materials used by Amiblu. Transportation modes and distances are collected for all raw materials, specific for each production site. Energy inputs are also specific for each site. Production site data were collected in the year of study defined on page 2. The data quality of the raw materials in A1 is presented in the table below. Allocation: Allocation was carried out in accordance with EN 15804. There are no-allocations between co-products in the EPD since there are no co-products created during the manufacturing. Environmental burdens related to A1 and A2 stages are allocated to pipes based on the specific pipe composition, transport modes and distances of raw materials to a plant in which the product has been produced. All manufacturing inputs (energy and auxiliary materials) are allocated equally to products through mass allocation. Equal allocation also applies to waste, although for certain waste flows, a specific allocation was performed based on the production process and product formulation. Effects of primary production of recycled materials is allocated to the main product in which the material was used. The recycling process and transportation of the material is allocated to this analysis. Cut-off criteria: All raw materials which are present in the final product at a concentration greater than 0.1 % are included. Some of the raw materials used at lower content are modeled using datasets representing the closest match according to the best knowledge of Amiblu. The contribution of capital goods is estimated to be lower than the general cut-off criteria of 1%. Transport of personnel is outside the scope of the LCA
Copyright Yes
Owner of data set
Quantitative reference
Reference flow(s)
Biogenic carbon content
  • Carbon content (biogenic): 1.0 kg
  • Carbon content (biogenic) - packaging: 1.0 kg
Time representativeness
Data set valid until 2030
Time representativeness description 2025-04-08 - 2030-04-08
Technological representativeness
Technology description including background system The list below provides a mass of a functional unit (1m pipe section with the coupling assembled on a 6m pipe unit). This information is used to calculate the A1-A3 and A4 outputs for 1m section of pipeline by multiplication with the values presented in tables. Furthermore, mass of 1m pipe section shall also be used to calculate A5 outputs according to the equation provided on page 5.

Indicators of life cycle

IndicatorDirectionUnit Production
A1-A3
Transport
A4
Installation
A5
De-construction
C1
Transport
C2
Waste processing
C3
Disposal
C4
Recycling Potential
D
Input
  • 1.45
  • 0.01774
  • 0.4029
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
Input
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
Input
  • 1.45
  • 0.01774
  • 0.4029
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
Input
  • 37.22
  • 1.257
  • 8.043
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
Input
  • 0.3008
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
Input
  • 37.52
  • 1.257
  • 8.043
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
Input
  • 0.004884
  • 0
  • 40.3
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
Input
  • 0.06611
  • 0.0006347
  • 0.009235
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
Input
  • -0.003649
  • 0.002266
  • 0.01921
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
Input
  • 0.0213
  • 0.0001323
  • 0.05218
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
Output
  • 0.002868
  • 0.00006409
  • 0.0006273
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
Output
  • 0.1818
  • 0.06007
  • 0.2227
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
Output
  • 0.00007664
  • 0.000008569
  • 0.00005613
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
Output
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
Output
  • 0.003026
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
Output
  • 0.0005606
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
Output
  • 0.001442
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
Output
  • 0.02181
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0

IndicatorUnit Production
A1-A3
Transport
A4
Installation
A5
De-construction
C1
Transport
C2
Waste processing
C3
Disposal
C4
Recycling Potential
D
Abiotic depletion potential - fossil resources (ADPF)
  • 37.37
  • 1.257
  • 7.965
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
Abiotic depletion potential - non-fossil resources (ADPE)
  • 0.00005604
  • 0.000002257
  • 0.00001551
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
Acidification potential, Accumulated Exceedance (AP)
  • 0.008837
  • 0.0003407
  • 0.003275
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
Global Warming Potential - biogenic (GWP-biogenic)
  • 0.003837
  • 0.00003398
  • 0.001805
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
Global Warming Potential - fossil fuels (GWP-fossil)
  • 1.65
  • 0.08334
  • 0.5316
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
Global Warming Potential - total (GWP-total)
  • 1.655
  • 0.08341
  • 0.5335
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
Global Warming Potential - land use and land use change (GWP-luluc)
  • 0.00109
  • 0.00002913
  • 0.0001706
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 1.655
  • 0.0834
  • 0.5359
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
Eutrophication potential - freshwater (EP-freshwater)
  • 0.00005819
  • 6.545E-7
  • 0.000005081
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
Eutrophication potential - marine (EP-marine)
  • 0.001516
  • 0.000101
  • 0.001175
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
Eutrophication potential - terrestrial (EP-terrestrial)
  • 0.01681
  • 0.001117
  • 0.01313
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
Photochemical Ozone Creation Potential (POCP)
  • 0.0104
  • 0.0003421
  • 0.003773
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
Depletion potential of the stratospheric ozone layer (ODP)
  • 2.346E-7
  • 1.9E-8
  • 1.15E-7
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
Water (user) deprivation potential (WDP)
  • 67.68
  • 1.199
  • 70.53
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0

IndicatorUnit Production
A1-A3
Transport
A4
Installation
A5
De-construction
C1
Transport
C2
Waste processing
C3
Disposal
C4
Recycling Potential
D
1This impact category deals mainly with the eventual impact of low dose ionizing radiation on human health of the nuclear fuel cycle. It does not consider effects due to possible nuclear accidents, occupational exposure nor due to radioactive waste disposal in underground facilities. Potential ionizing radiation from the soil, from radon and from some construction materials is also not measured by this indicator.
2The results of this environmental impact indicator shall be used with care as the uncertainties on these results are high or as there is limited experiences with the indicator.
Potential Human exposure efficiency relative to U235 (IRP) 1
  • 0.07296
  • 0.005493
  • 0.04138
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
Potential incidence of disease due to PM emissions (PM) 2
  • 7.689E-8
  • 6E-9
  • 7.855E-8
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
Potential Soil quality index (SQP) 2
  • 5.843
  • 0.8664
  • 0.1139
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
Potential Comparative Toxic Unit for humans - non-cancer effects (HTP-nc) 2
  • 3.78E-8
  • 1E-9
  • 6.399E-9
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
Potential Comparative Toxic Unit for humans - cancer effects (HTP-c) 2
  • 2.938E-9
  • 0
  • 1.21E-10
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
Potential Comparative Toxic Unit for ecosystems (ETP-fw) 2
  • 46.77
  • 0.9256
  • 5.872
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0