Close Go back Collapse all sections
Process Data set: Alumi Combi Screen Single e3 1463x1905 (en) en

Key Data Set Information
Location SE
Geographical representativeness description The product is available worldwide. The distance to the market is based on shipping to Scandinavia or Western Europe.
Reference year 2024
Name
Alumi Combi Screen Single e3 1463x1905
Use advice for data set The EPD is a cradle-to-grave analysis, A1-D, where some B-stages (use phase) that were assumed to be neglectable are not included. The A1-A4 stages includes the extraction and production of raw materials, transportation to the production site, the production process itself, and an estimated transport distance to the market. A5 includes the generated waste from the packaging of the product after assembly at the customer. The only B stage that is assumed to be relevant is B2. This stage includes assumptions on how the customer takes care of the product according to Abstracta's care instructions. The C- and D-stages includes the use of materials and energy for deconstruction, the transport to waste management, the waste processes, disposal of materials that cannot be processed, and the potential of reuse, recovery, and recycling of the product.
Technical purpose of product or process Nina Jobs designed Alumi Combi and Alumi Combi Double with the aim of encouraging colleagues to have spontaneous meetings. The screens, which function both as sound absorbers and writing boards, are mounted on wheels for easy portability. The versatile writing boards have the same understated look as the other sound-absorbing screens in the Alumi series, allowing them to be combined in harmonious unity. One side of the Alumi Combi Screen is upholstered in fabric. The other side with an e3 ceramic steel whiteboard from PolyVision on the top and upholstery below it. Alumi Combi Double Screens have a whiteboard on both sides with upholstery above it. Visit the product page for more information: https://abstracta.se/product/alumi-combi-sound-absorbing-writingboard/ The floor screen consists of a sound-absorbent filling mounted within a solid frame. One side of the Alumi Combi Screen is upholstered in fabric. The other side with an e3 ceramic steel whiteboard on the top and upholstery below it. Alumi Combi Double Screens have a whiteboard on both sides with upholstery above it. Choose your upholstery from a wide variety of options. This EPD includes the following variants: Alumi Combi Screen Single e3 1463x1905 Alumi Combi Screen Single e3 1206x1905 Alumi Combi Screen Single e3 796x1905 Alumi Combi Screen Double e3 1463x1905 Alumi Combi Screen Double e3 1206x1905 Alumi Combi Screen Double e3 796x1905 It also includes the following options: Alumi Combi Screen Single e3 1463x1905 with polyester upholstery Alumi Combi Screen Double e3 1463x1905 with polyester upholstery Alumi Combi Screen Single e3 1463x1905 without leg set See the product sheet for more information: https://lammhults.sharepoint.com/:b:/s/abs-webpage/EdPWNCsxIBFIj6fDiTtHpN8BQPNRJhD0GdfxfOra9plIpQ?e=0vcUgX
Classification
Class name : Hierarchy level
  • EPDNorge: Furniture / Plate furniture
General comment on data set Data quality: Specific data for the product composition are provided by the manufacturer. They represent the production of the declared product and were collected for EPD development in the year of study. Background data is based on registered EPDs according to EN 15804, Ostfold Research databases, ecoinvent and other LCA databases. The data quality of the raw materials in A1 is presented in the table below. Allocation: The allocation is made in accordance with the provisions of EN 15804. Incoming energy and water and waste production in-house is allocated equally among all products through mass allocation. Effects of primary production of recycled materials is allocated to the main product in which the material was used. The recycling process and transportation of the material is allocated to this analysis. Cut-off criteria: All major raw materials and all the essential energy is included. The production processes for raw materials and energy flows with very small amounts (less than 1%) are not included. These cut-off criteria do not apply for hazardous materials and substances.
Copyright Yes
Owner of data set
Quantitative reference
Reference flow(s)
Biogenic carbon content
  • Carbon content (biogenic): 2.359259259448 kg
  • Carbon content (biogenic) - packaging: 3.636176471168 kg
Time representativeness
Data set valid until 2029
Time representativeness description 2024-10-03 - 2029-10-03
Technological representativeness
Technology description including background system The dimensions of Alumi Combi Screen are 1463x1905x63, but other sizes are also available. The product does not include a leg set, but in this EPD a standard choice for legs has been included. For more information on the technical data of Alumi Combi Screen, see the technical data sheet: https://lammhults.sharepoint.com/:b:/s/abs-webpage/Ee1_VBjTMLFIuSg6SiP3LWgBNtAvqtjgOfs5gAu-olv0TA?e=6YnDWH

Indicators of life cycle

IndicatorDirectionUnit Production
A1-A3
Transport
A4
Installation
A5
Maintenance
B2
Repair
B3
Replacement
B4
De-construction
C1
Transport
C2
Waste processing
C3
Disposal
C4
Recycling Potential
D
Input
  • 1932
  • 0.8272
  • 0.02655
  • 2.165
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0.0821
  • 0.6242
  • 0.06709
  • -97.47
Input
  • 146.3
  • 0
  • -41.81
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • -73.27
  • 0
  • 0
Input
  • 2079
  • 0.8272
  • -41.79
  • 2.165
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0.0821
  • -72.65
  • 0.06709
  • -97.47
Input
  • 2.94E+3
  • 58.08
  • 1.489
  • 2.236
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 5.735
  • 5.337
  • 2.93
  • -95.26
Input
  • 172.1
  • 0
  • -11.68
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • -142.1
  • 0
  • 0
Input
  • 3112
  • 58.08
  • -10.19
  • 2.236
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 5.735
  • -136.7
  • 2.93
  • -95.26
Input
  • 7.269
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
Input
  • 1.366
  • 0.02956
  • 0.000847
  • 0.02187
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0.002937
  • 0.01387
  • 0.001607
  • 0.2437
Input
  • 13.71
  • 0.1054
  • 0.004996
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0.0105
  • 0
  • 0.08068
  • 2.583
Input
  • 8.512
  • 0.00618
  • 0.0009135
  • 0.009848
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0.0006133
  • 0.008324
  • 0.002855
  • -0.1583
Output
  • 1.246
  • 0.00299
  • 0
  • 0.0002063
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0.0002958
  • 0
  • 8.644
  • -0.0315
Output
  • 81.57
  • 2.8
  • 6.259
  • 0.01367
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0.2789
  • 1.255
  • 3.968
  • -3.756
Output
  • 0.1629
  • 0.0003957
  • 0
  • 0.00002306
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0.00003907
  • 0
  • 0.00001754
  • -0.0001361
Output
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
Output
  • 0.3475
  • 0
  • 4.741
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 14.89
  • 0.0001369
  • 0
Output
  • 1.119
  • 0
  • 1.156
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 23.87
  • 0.000001107
  • 0
Output
  • 0.6877
  • 0
  • 1.417
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 10.8
  • 0.000009566
  • 0
Output
  • 10.4
  • 0
  • 21.44
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 163.4
  • 0.0001447
  • 0

IndicatorUnit Production
A1-A3
Transport
A4
Installation
A5
Maintenance
B2
Repair
B3
Replacement
B4
De-construction
C1
Transport
C2
Waste processing
C3
Disposal
C4
Recycling Potential
D
Abiotic depletion potential - fossil resources (ADPF)
  • 3045
  • 58.08
  • 1.489
  • 2.201
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 5.735
  • 5.288
  • 2.93
  • -95.29
Abiotic depletion potential - non-fossil resources (ADPE)
  • 0.002476
  • 0.0001054
  • 0.000002415
  • 0.000001267
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0.00001048
  • 0.000003828
  • 0.000001916
  • -0.0001321
Acidification potential, Accumulated Exceedance (AP)
  • 3.202
  • 0.01228
  • 0.0006928
  • 0.0003757
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0.00109
  • 0.004523
  • 0.0009455
  • -0.05488
Global Warming Potential - biogenic (GWP-biogenic)
  • 37.2
  • 0.001586
  • 9.956
  • 0.001489
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0.000157
  • 11.36
  • 0.0963
  • -0.01341
Global Warming Potential - fossil fuels (GWP-fossil)
  • 230.6
  • 3.847
  • 1.069
  • 0.08147
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0.3793
  • 12.3
  • 0.1527
  • -9.822
Global Warming Potential - total (GWP-total)
  • 276.7
  • 3.85
  • 11.03
  • 0.08742
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0.3796
  • 23.66
  • 0.249
  • -9.902
Global Warming Potential - land use and land use change (GWP-luluc)
  • 8.848
  • 0.00138
  • 0.00003433
  • 0.004463
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0.000135
  • 0.0002328
  • 0.00003809
  • -0.06711
  • 292.2
  • 3.85
  • 1.069
  • 0.1185
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0.3796
  • 15.12
  • 0.2565
  • -13.41
Eutrophication potential - freshwater (EP-freshwater)
  • 0.02689
  • 0.00003057
  • 0.000001029
  • 0.000005389
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0.00000303
  • 0.00002161
  • 0.000002128
  • -0.0005939
Eutrophication potential - marine (EP-marine)
  • 0.5379
  • 0.002498
  • 0.0002646
  • 0.00005936
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0.0002157
  • 0.001887
  • 0.0004832
  • -0.01143
Eutrophication potential - terrestrial (EP-terrestrial)
  • 11.53
  • 0.02792
  • 0.002849
  • 0.0007971
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0.002413
  • 0.01989
  • 0.003633
  • -0.1194
Photochemical Ozone Creation Potential (POCP)
  • 0.7604
  • 0.01023
  • 0.0007648
  • 0.0001867
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0.0009242
  • 0.00501
  • 0.001072
  • -0.04916
Depletion potential of the stratospheric ozone layer (ODP)
  • 0.00002834
  • 8.704E-7
  • 2.185E-8
  • 8.815E-9
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 8.592E-8
  • 1.083E-7
  • 3.977E-8
  • -0.07018
Water (user) deprivation potential (WDP)
  • 1.427E+4
  • 55.77
  • 2.06
  • 170.2
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 5.547
  • 14.71
  • 8.995
  • -721.4

IndicatorUnit Production
A1-A3
Transport
A4
Installation
A5
Maintenance
B2
Repair
B3
Replacement
B4
De-construction
C1
Transport
C2
Waste processing
C3
Disposal
C4
Recycling Potential
D
1This impact category deals mainly with the eventual impact of low dose ionizing radiation on human health of the nuclear fuel cycle. It does not consider effects due to possible nuclear accidents, occupational exposure nor due to radioactive waste disposal in underground facilities. Potential ionizing radiation from the soil, from radon and from some construction materials is also not measured by this indicator.
2The results of this environmental impact indicator shall be used with care as the uncertainties on these results are high or as there is limited experiences with the indicator.
Potential Human exposure efficiency relative to U235 (IRP) 1
  • 7.944
  • 0.2538
  • 0.006042
  • 0.0502
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0.02507
  • 0.01848
  • 0.01211
  • -0.1513
Potential incidence of disease due to PM emissions (PM) 2
  • 0.00002414
  • 2.342E-7
  • 8.539E-9
  • 1.991E-9
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 2.322E-8
  • 5.693E-8
  • 1.671E-8
  • -0.000001195
Potential Soil quality index (SQP) 2
  • -7.346E+4
  • 40.33
  • 0.9462
  • 1.659
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 4.011
  • 1.552
  • 6.444
  • -96.85
Potential Comparative Toxic Unit for humans - non-cancer effects (HTP-nc) 2
  • 0.000003539
  • 4.698E-8
  • 5.202E-9
  • 1.691E-9
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 4.644E-9
  • 3.803E-8
  • 2.383E-9
  • 6.379E-7
Potential Comparative Toxic Unit for humans - cancer effects (HTP-c) 2
  • 4.22E-7
  • 0
  • 1.2E-10
  • 6.4E-11
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 1.84E-9
  • 8.2E-11
  • -4.031E-8
Potential Comparative Toxic Unit for ecosystems (ETP-fw) 2
  • 5228
  • 42.96
  • 1.999
  • 2.756
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 4.251
  • 33.21
  • 2.426
  • -503.2