Close Go back Collapse all sections
Process Data set: Envistar Flex 240 with thermal wheel, controls and ThermoCooler (en) en

Key Data Set Information
Location SE
Geographical representativeness description Europe
Reference year 2025
Name
Envistar Flex 240 with thermal wheel, controls and ThermoCooler
Technical purpose of product or process Air Handling Unit (AHU) for non residential building. Envistar Flex ThermoCooler air handling unit for non residential buildings. Bi-directional including rotating heat exchanger and damper with integrated cooling, heating and controls.
Classification
Class name : Hierarchy level
  • EPDNorge: Construction / Ventilation components
General comment on data set Data quality: Specific data for the product composition are provided by the manufacturer. The data represent the production of the declared product and were collected for EPD development in the year of study. Background data is based on EPDs according to EN 15804 and different LCA databases. The data quality of the raw materials in A1 is presented in the table below. Allocation: The allocation is made in accordance with the provisions of EN 15804. Energy, water and waste production in-house is allocated equally among all products through mass allocation. Effects of primary production of recycled materials is allocated to the main product in which the material was used. The recycling process and transportation of the material is allocated to this analysis. Cut-off criteria: All major raw materials and all the essential energy is included. The production processes for raw materials and energy flows with very small amounts (less than 1%) are not included. These cut-off criteria do not apply for hazardous materials and substances.
Copyright Yes
Owner of data set
Quantitative reference
Reference flow(s)
Biogenic carbon content
  • Carbon content (biogenic): 0.0 kg
  • Carbon content (biogenic) - packaging: 0.0 kg
Time representativeness
Data set valid until 2030
Time representativeness description 2025-05-19 - 2030-05-19
Technological representativeness
Technology description including background system According to printout from IVP Designer (selection program).

Indicators of life cycle

IndicatorDirectionUnit Production
A1-A3
 Transport
A4
 De-construction
C1
 Transport
C2
 Waste processing
C3
 Disposal
C4
 Recycling Potential
D
Input
  • 1.688E+4
  • 9.039
  • 0
  • 2.91
  • 88.82
  • 16.22
  • -7246
Input
  • 14.86
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
Input
  • 1.69E+4
  • 9.039
  • 0
  • 2.91
  • 88.82
  • 16.22
  • -7246
Input
  • 6.205E+4
  • 677.5
  • 0
  • 203.3
  • 498.5
  • 71.43
  • -2.407E+4
Input
  • 1334
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • -784.6
  • 0
  • 0
Input
  • 6.337E+4
  • 677.5
  • 0
  • 203.3
  • -286.1
  • 71.43
  • -2.407E+4
Input
  • 354.8
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0.000432
  • 0.3444
  • 2.495
Input
  • 98.62
  • 0.3196
  • 0
  • 0.1041
  • 1.867
  • 0.08641
  • 12.31
Input
  • 1141
  • 1.105
  • 0
  • 0.3723
  • -0.009291
  • 3.408
  • 443.9
Input
  • 123.7
  • 0.07505
  • 0
  • 0.02174
  • 0.5082
  • 0.0717
  • -39.07
Output
  • 40.85
  • 0.03613
  • 0
  • 0.01049
  • 0.004861
  • 17.02
  • 2.796
Output
  • 1552
  • 47.49
  • 0
  • 9.888
  • 74.03
  • 95.77
  • -625.7
Output
  • 0.2614
  • 0.004621
  • 0
  • 0.001385
  • 0.0002441
  • 0.000009367
  • -0.08038
Output
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
Output
  • 123.6
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 811.5
  • 0.0003047
  • -0.432
Output
  • 40.31
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 69.95
  • 0.000008703
  • -0.05403
Output
  • 23.76
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 3.826
  • 0.0002984
  • -0.2525
Output
  • 359.5
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 57.88
  • 0.004514
  • -3.82

IndicatorUnit Production
A1-A3
 Transport
A4
 De-construction
C1
 Transport
C2
 Waste processing
C3
 Disposal
C4
 Recycling Potential
D
Abiotic depletion potential - fossil resources (ADPF)
  • 6.347E+4
  • 677.5
  • 0
  • 203.3
  • 496.4
  • 71.35
  • -2.407E+4
Abiotic depletion potential - non-fossil resources (ADPE)
  • 1.888
  • 0.0009606
  • 0
  • 0.0003714
  • 0.0004507
  • 0.0000328
  • -0.4137
Acidification potential, Accumulated Exceedance (AP)
  • 53.63
  • 0.1319
  • 0
  • 0.03864
  • 0.1812
  • 0.0287
  • -26.74
Global Warming Potential - biogenic (GWP-biogenic)
  • 27.91
  • 0.01816
  • 0
  • 0.005565
  • 0.2759
  • 0.006006
  • -7.4
Global Warming Potential - fossil fuels (GWP-fossil)
  • 5134
  • 43.07
  • 0
  • 13.45
  • 165.7
  • 8.183
  • -2036
Global Warming Potential - total (GWP-total)
  • 5176
  • 43.1
  • 0
  • 13.46
  • 166
  • 8.22
  • -2071
Global Warming Potential - land use and land use change (GWP-luluc)
  • 14.38
  • 0.01413
  • 0
  • 0.004786
  • 0.0401
  • 0.03058
  • -27.41
  • 5173
  • 43.1
  • 0
  • 13.46
  • 145.2
  • 8.375
  • -2205
Eutrophication potential - freshwater (EP-freshwater)
  • 0.4201
  • 0.0003433
  • 0
  • 0.0001074
  • 0.002657
  • 0.0001972
  • -0.1724
Eutrophication potential - marine (EP-marine)
  • 6.293
  • 0.02768
  • 0
  • 0.007646
  • 0.03869
  • 0.007278
  • -2.382
Eutrophication potential - terrestrial (EP-terrestrial)
  • 111.2
  • 0.3091
  • 0
  • 0.08553
  • 0.4322
  • 0.07816
  • -28.22
Photochemical Ozone Creation Potential (POCP)
  • 23.75
  • 0.1202
  • 0
  • 0.03276
  • 0.121
  • 0.02924
  • -9.525
Depletion potential of the stratospheric ozone layer (ODP)
  • 0.005329
  • 0.0000101
  • 0
  • 0.000003046
  • 0.00001303
  • 5.821E-7
  • -0.09769
Water (user) deprivation potential (WDP)
  • 5.77E+5
  • 579.1
  • 0
  • 196.6
  • 2341
  • 639.6
  • -7.94E+5

IndicatorUnit Production
A1-A3
 Transport
A4
 De-construction
C1
 Transport
C2
 Waste processing
C3
 Disposal
C4
 Recycling Potential
D
1This impact category deals mainly with the eventual impact of low dose ionizing radiation on human health of the nuclear fuel cycle. It does not consider effects due to possible nuclear accidents, occupational exposure nor due to radioactive waste disposal in underground facilities. Potential ionizing radiation from the soil, from radon and from some construction materials is also not measured by this indicator.
2The results of this environmental impact indicator shall be used with care as the uncertainties on these results are high or as there is limited experiences with the indicator.
Potential Human exposure efficiency relative to U235 (IRP) 1
  • 255.5
  • 2.961
  • 0
  • 0.8886
  • 2.317
  • 0.2355
  • -86.09
Potential incidence of disease due to PM emissions (PM) 2
  • 0.0004603
  • 0.000003353
  • 0
  • 8.232E-7
  • 0.00000256
  • 4.38E-7
  • -0.0001646
Potential Soil quality index (SQP) 2
  • 2.56E+4
  • 643.5
  • 0
  • 142.2
  • 194.7
  • 198.6
  • -2644
Potential Comparative Toxic Unit for humans - non-cancer effects (HTP-nc) 2
  • 0.0004192
  • 5.095E-7
  • 0
  • 1.646E-7
  • 0.00001028
  • 0.000002735
  • -0.00007669
Potential Comparative Toxic Unit for humans - cancer effects (HTP-c) 2
  • 0.00002222
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 2.692E-7
  • 5.529E-8
  • -0.000006605
Potential Comparative Toxic Unit for ecosystems (ETP-fw) 2
  • 3.646E+5
  • 498.4
  • 0
  • 150.7
  • 2451
  • 8149
  • -1.629E+5