Close Go back Collapse all sections
Process Data set: NorDan Bor External Door 630G Utsikten Alu (with glass and aluminium cladding) (en) en

Key Data Set Information
Location SE
Geographical representativeness description Europe, but scenarios beyond cradle-to-gate are based on the situation in the Norwegian market.
Reference year 2024
Name
NorDan Bor External Door 630G Utsikten Alu (with glass and aluminium cladding)
Technical purpose of product or process External door for use in exterior walls of domestic and commercial buildings. Product NorDan Bor external door 630G Utsikten Alu with aluminium cladding in size 1230x2180 mm is covered in this EPD. Triple glazed unit 4E# + 16G + 4 + 16G + #E4
Classification
Class name : Hierarchy level
  • EPDNorge: Construction / Doors and windows
General comment on data set Data quality: Specific data for the product composition are provided by the manufacturer. The data represent the production of the declared product and were collected for EPD development in the year of study. Background data is based on EPDs according to EN 15804 and different LCA databases. The data quality of the raw materials in A1 is presented in the table below. Material quantities of the specified product in reference size have been calculated by NorDan's business system. The production data was collected in 2021 and is an average for 2020. Allocation: The allocation is made in accordance with the provisions of EN 15804. Effects of primary production of recycled materials is allocated to the main product in which the material was used. The recycling process and transportation of the material is allocated to this analysis. The PCR specific background data follow the allocation rules in the Ecoinvent v3.7.1 Cut-off database version. The allocation of water, energy and waste flows within the production facilities for windows and doors follows unit-based allocation adjusted with a point system to different product groups or products. This score system is regulated by a factor which increases with the resource intensity of each product. The unit-based allocation is adjusted by the weight of the product, excluding the weight of glass. Cut-off criteria: All major raw materials and all the essential energy is included. The production processes for raw materials and energy flows with very small amounts (less than 1%) are not included. These cut-off criteria do not apply for hazardous materials and substances.
Copyright Yes
Owner of data set
Quantitative reference
Reference flow(s)
Biogenic carbon content
  • Carbon content (biogenic): 22.837436866263 kg
  • Carbon content (biogenic) - packaging: 4.0979499997 kg
Time representativeness
Data set valid until 2029
Time representativeness description "2024-06-02" - "2029-06-02"
Technological representativeness
Technology description including background system External door with 10mm aluminium cladding. Triple glazed, 115 mm frame with 79 mm door leaf. U-value 1,0 W/m2K. The total weight of the product is 108,6 kg and the packaging has an average weight of 9,58 kg. Area of functional unit 2,68m2. Conversion factor is 0,373 for 1 m2

Indicators of life cycle

IndicatorDirectionUnit Production
A1-A3
Transport
A4
Installation
A5
Maintenance
B2
Replacement
B4
De-construction
C1
Transport
C2
Waste processing
C3
Disposal
C4
Recycling Potential
D
Input
  • 1925
  • 1.446
  • 0.02215
  • 5.169
  • 1927
  • 0
  • 0.1713
  • 3.816
  • 0.3109
  • -314.5
Input
  • 848.7
  • 0
  • -199.1
  • 0
  • 649.7
  • 0
  • 0
  • -648.9
  • 0
  • 0
Input
  • 2774
  • 1.446
  • -199
  • 5.169
  • 2576
  • 0
  • 0.1713
  • -645.1
  • 0.3108
  • -314.5
Input
  • 3566
  • 109.9
  • 1.301
  • 71.03
  • 3678
  • 0
  • 11.94
  • 25.98
  • 16.49
  • -151.5
Input
  • 146.9
  • 0
  • -5.876
  • 0
  • 141
  • 0
  • 0
  • -154.5
  • 0
  • 0
Input
  • 3713
  • 109.9
  • -4.576
  • 71.03
  • 3819
  • 0
  • 11.94
  • -128.6
  • 16.49
  • -151.5
Input
  • 1.12
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 1.12
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
Input
  • 3.894
  • 0.05098
  • 0.0007198
  • 0.03437
  • 3.945
  • 0
  • 0.006096
  • 0.07955
  • 0.008228
  • -0.03523
Input
  • 5.286
  • 0.1751
  • 0.003197
  • 0.01462
  • 5.464
  • 0
  • 0.02141
  • 0
  • 0.4083
  • -15.59
Input
  • 8.303
  • 0.01225
  • 0.000629
  • 0.2299
  • 8.316
  • 0
  • 0.001351
  • 0.03101
  • 0.01487
  • -0.5339
Output
  • 4.625
  • 0.005898
  • 0
  • 0.01501
  • 4.631
  • 0
  • 0.0006437
  • 0
  • 64.25
  • 0.02698
Output
  • 70.21
  • 8.154
  • 5.592
  • 0.6932
  • 83.95
  • 0
  • 0.7399
  • 51.39
  • 0.6793
  • -3.667
Output
  • 0.02154
  • 0.0007497
  • 0
  • 0.0001976
  • 0.02229
  • 0
  • 0.00008118
  • 0
  • 0.0001014
  • -0.0006421
Output
  • 0
  • 0
  • 3.99
  • 0
  • 3.99
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
Output
  • 5.389
  • 0
  • 4.939
  • 0
  • 10.33
  • 0
  • 0
  • 1.995
  • 0
  • 0
Output
  • 6.48
  • 0
  • 0.5682
  • 0
  • 7.049
  • 0
  • 0
  • 111.5
  • 0
  • 0
Output
  • 4.41
  • 0
  • 0.4394
  • 0.177
  • 4.85
  • 0
  • 0
  • 36.32
  • 0
  • 0
Output
  • 55.37
  • 0
  • 6.647
  • 1.228
  • 62.01
  • 0
  • 0
  • 549.5
  • 0
  • 0

IndicatorUnit Production
A1-A3
Transport
A4
Installation
A5
Maintenance
B2
Replacement
B4
De-construction
C1
Transport
C2
Waste processing
C3
Disposal
C4
Recycling Potential
D
Abiotic depletion potential - fossil resources (ADPF)
  • 3743
  • 109.9
  • 1.301
  • 70.65
  • 3855
  • 0
  • 11.94
  • 25.98
  • 16.49
  • -151.5
Abiotic depletion potential - non-fossil resources (ADPE)
  • 0.003858
  • 0.0001472
  • 0.000002215
  • 0.00006048
  • 0.004007
  • 0
  • 0.00002014
  • 0.00000932
  • 0.00001244
  • -0.00003267
Acidification potential, Accumulated Exceedance (AP)
  • 1.845
  • 0.02148
  • 0.0004602
  • 0.02158
  • 1.867
  • 0
  • 0.004431
  • 0.01999
  • 0.005105
  • -0.08305
Global Warming Potential - biogenic (GWP-biogenic)
  • -74.04
  • 0.002934
  • 15.02
  • 0.009952
  • -59.01
  • 0
  • 0.0003337
  • 62.15
  • 0.0005432
  • -0.04307
Global Warming Potential - fossil fuels (GWP-fossil)
  • 249.8
  • 6.932
  • 0.1034
  • 3.116
  • 256.9
  • 0
  • 0.7776
  • 17.4
  • 0.729
  • -11.79
Global Warming Potential - total (GWP-total)
  • 176.7
  • 6.937
  • 15.13
  • 3.367
  • 198.7
  • 0
  • 0.7782
  • 79.56
  • 0.7297
  • -12.09
Global Warming Potential - land use and land use change (GWP-luluc)
  • 0.8574
  • 0.002236
  • 0.00003034
  • 0.2412
  • 0.8596
  • 0
  • 0.0002752
  • 0.0006054
  • 0.0002179
  • -0.2581
  • 273.5
  • 6.937
  • 0.1034
  • 3.366
  • 280.5
  • 0
  • 0.7782
  • 17.41
  • 0.7333
  • -12.06
Eutrophication potential - freshwater (EP-freshwater)
  • 0.009426
  • 0.00005523
  • 7.864E-7
  • 0.0001579
  • 0.009482
  • 0
  • 0.000006399
  • 0.00002658
  • 0.000007316
  • -0.0006316
Eutrophication potential - marine (EP-marine)
  • 0.3293
  • 0.004558
  • 0.0001663
  • 0.00331
  • 0.334
  • 0
  • 0.001585
  • 0.008902
  • 0.001818
  • -0.01599
Eutrophication potential - terrestrial (EP-terrestrial)
  • 3.746
  • 0.05088
  • 0.001693
  • 0.03011
  • 3.799
  • 0
  • 0.01747
  • 0.09107
  • 0.02007
  • -0.1737
Photochemical Ozone Creation Potential (POCP)
  • 1.109
  • 0.01983
  • 0.0004829
  • 0.01844
  • 1.129
  • 0
  • 0.004994
  • 0.02326
  • 0.00579
  • -0.05411
Depletion potential of the stratospheric ozone layer (ODP)
  • 0.00003118
  • 0.000001636
  • 1.95E-8
  • 3.888E-7
  • 0.00003283
  • 0
  • 1.773E-7
  • 3.616E-7
  • 2.227E-7
  • -0.2291
Water (user) deprivation potential (WDP)
  • 6.288E+4
  • 91.56
  • 1.789
  • 46.06
  • 6.297E+4
  • 0
  • 11.31
  • 99.86
  • 33.62
  • -5027

IndicatorUnit Production
A1-A3
Transport
A4
Installation
A5
Maintenance
B2
Replacement
B4
De-construction
C1
Transport
C2
Waste processing
C3
Disposal
C4
Recycling Potential
D
1This impact category deals mainly with the eventual impact of low dose ionizing radiation on human health of the nuclear fuel cycle. It does not consider effects due to possible nuclear accidents, occupational exposure nor due to radioactive waste disposal in underground facilities. Potential ionizing radiation from the soil, from radon and from some construction materials is also not measured by this indicator.
2The results of this environmental impact indicator shall be used with care as the uncertainties on these results are high or as there is limited experiences with the indicator.
Potential Human exposure efficiency relative to U235 (IRP) 1
  • 31.9
  • 0.4803
  • 0.005537
  • 0.1638
  • 32.39
  • 0
  • 0.05218
  • 0.09514
  • 0.06635
  • -0.7195
Potential incidence of disease due to PM emissions (PM) 2
  • 0.0000277
  • 5.628E-7
  • 6.735E-9
  • 1.377E-7
  • 0.00002827
  • 0
  • 7.091E-8
  • 2.876E-7
  • 9.314E-8
  • -0.000002184
Potential Soil quality index (SQP) 2
  • 1.569E+4
  • 109.7
  • 0.9256
  • 26.84
  • 1.58E+4
  • 0
  • 10.22
  • 9.641
  • 36.01
  • -302
Potential Comparative Toxic Unit for humans - non-cancer effects (HTP-nc) 2
  • 0.000007022
  • 8.143E-8
  • 2.415E-9
  • 4.519E-8
  • 0.000007106
  • 0
  • 1.182E-8
  • 1.309E-7
  • 9.605E-9
  • -3.848E-7
Potential Comparative Toxic Unit for humans - cancer effects (HTP-c) 2
  • 6.628E-7
  • 0
  • 5.6E-11
  • 4.07E-9
  • 6.629E-7
  • 0
  • 0
  • 1.206E-8
  • 3.58E-10
  • -2.815E-8
Potential Comparative Toxic Unit for ecosystems (ETP-fw) 2
  • 7943
  • 80.71
  • 1.693
  • 66.56
  • 8025
  • 0
  • 8.926
  • 125
  • 9.884
  • -406.9