Close Go back Collapse all sections
Process Data set: weber rex fix Renovation tile fix (weber rex fix Saneerauslaasti) (en) en

Key Data Set Information
Location FI
Geographical representativeness description Nordic and Baltic countries
Reference year 2024
Name
weber rex fix Renovation tile fix (weber rex fix Saneerauslaasti)
Use advice for data set All processes from raw materials extraction to product transportation to the building site, assembly as well as end of life stage and phases beyond the system boundary (A1-A5, C1-C4, D) are included in the analysis. The basic production process comprises of mixing raw materials together. Ready mixed product is then packed into bags for delivery. At assembly phase, water is added according to the instructions and it is mixed. Stage B is not considered. Default waste treatment scenario from NPCR Part B Technical - Chemical products for building and construction industry is applied: When building is demolished at the end-of-life 10% of the product is collected for material recycling, and remaining 90% is disposed to landfill. System boundaries (cradle-to-gate with options, modules A4-A5, C1-C4 and D) are illustrated in the picture below.
Technical purpose of product or process weber rex fix Renovation tile fix is used in ceramic tile and natural stone tile mounting on walls and floors. It has good adhesion on demanding substrates. Delivered in 20 kg bags. GTIN 6415910041106.
Classification
Class name : Hierarchy level
  • EPDNorge: Construction / Technical-chemical building materials products
General comment on data set Data quality: Specific data for the product composition are provided by the manufacturer. The data represent the production of the declared product and were collected for EPD development in the year of study. Background data is based on EPDs according to EN 15804 and different LCA databases. The data quality of the raw materials in A1 is presented in the table below. Allocation: The allocation is made in accordance with the provisions of EN 15804. Incoming energy and water and waste production in-house is allocated equally among all products through mass allocation. Effects of primary production of recycled materials is allocated to the main product in which the material was used. The recycling process and transportation of the material is allocated to this analysis. Cut-off criteria: All major raw materials and all the essential energy is included. The production processes for raw materials and energy flows with very small amounts (less than 1%) are not included. These cut-off criteria do not apply for hazardous materials and substances.
Copyright Yes
Owner of data set
Quantitative reference
Reference flow(s)
Biogenic carbon content
  • Carbon content (biogenic): 1.0 kg
  • Carbon content (biogenic) - packaging: 1.0 kg
Time representativeness
Data set valid until 2029
Time representativeness description "2024-07-12" - "2029-07-12"
Technological representativeness
Technology description including background system weber rex fix Renovation tile fix is produced according to the requirements of EN 12004:2007 + A1:2012 (Cementitious Adhesive for Ceramic Tiles). Material consumption: approx. 3 kg/m² Maximum layer thickness: 10 mm Recommended water content: approx. 5,6-6,0 L/20 kg. More information: www.fi.weber/laatoitusratkaisut-ja-tuotteet/kiinnityslaastit/weber-rex-fix-saneerauslaasti

Indicators of life cycle

IndicatorDirectionUnit Production
A1-A3
Transport
A4
Installation
A5
De-construction
C1
Transport
C2
Waste processing
C3
Disposal
C4
Recycling Potential
D
Input
  • 0.5746
  • 0.00363
  • 0.03466
  • 0.0003
  • 0.0008897
  • 0.001135
  • 0.007274
  • -0.0009071
Input
  • 0.3193
  • 0
  • -0.2728
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
Input
  • 0.8939
  • 0.00363
  • -0.2381
  • 0.0003
  • 0.0008897
  • 0.001135
  • 0.007274
  • -0.0009071
Input
  • 3.551
  • 0.2884
  • 0.2287
  • 0.05507
  • 0.07068
  • 0.002206
  • 0.2031
  • -0.004088
Input
  • 2.27
  • 0
  • -0.08694
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
Input
  • 5.822
  • 0.2884
  • 0.1418
  • 0.05507
  • 0.07068
  • 0.002206
  • 0.2031
  • -0.004088
Input
  • 0.002872
  • 0
  • 0.0001436
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
Input
  • 0.168
  • 0.000127
  • 0.008493
  • 0
  • 0.00003112
  • 0
  • 0.000151
  • -0.00001855
Input
  • 0.9827
  • 0.0004256
  • 0.04939
  • 0
  • 0.0001043
  • 0
  • 0.0003259
  • -0.00001905
Input
  • 0.003805
  • 0.00003284
  • 0.0005238
  • 0.000002834
  • 0.000008049
  • 0.000003778
  • 0.00025
  • -0.0001423
Output
  • 0.0005277
  • 0.00001579
  • 0.00002867
  • 0.000001621
  • 0.000003869
  • 2.203E-7
  • 0
  • -9.336E-7
Output
  • 0.04173
  • 0.02509
  • 0.05448
  • 0.00006521
  • 0.006148
  • 0.000006959
  • 0.9
  • -0.00002831
Output
  • 0.00001519
  • 0.000001969
  • 0.000001093
  • 3.824E-7
  • 4.826E-7
  • 2.332E-8
  • 0
  • -3.072E-8
Output
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0.01976
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
Output
  • 0.000004396
  • 0
  • 0.00741
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0.1
  • 0
  • 0
Output
  • 0.0009034
  • 0
  • 0.001077
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
Output
  • 0.0005338
  • 0
  • 0.0007446
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
Output
  • 0.008076
  • 0
  • 0.01126
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0

IndicatorUnit Production
A1-A3
Transport
A4
Installation
A5
De-construction
C1
Transport
C2
Waste processing
C3
Disposal
C4
Recycling Potential
D
Abiotic depletion potential - fossil resources (ADPF)
  • 5.628
  • 0.2884
  • 0.332
  • 0.05507
  • 0.07068
  • 0.002205
  • 0.2031
  • -0.003873
Abiotic depletion potential - non-fossil resources (ADPE)
  • 0.000003276
  • 3.166E-7
  • 1.968E-7
  • 6.14E-9
  • 7.76E-8
  • 9.01E-10
  • 6.65E-8
  • -2.033E-8
Acidification potential, Accumulated Exceedance (AP)
  • 0.001552
  • 0.00007793
  • 0.00009146
  • 0.00004186
  • 0.0000191
  • 5.748E-7
  • 0.00006567
  • -0.000002061
Global Warming Potential - biogenic (GWP-biogenic)
  • -0.02456
  • 0.000007609
  • 0.0303
  • 7.502E-7
  • 0.000001865
  • 6.134E-7
  • 0.000008619
  • -0.000004568
Global Warming Potential - fossil fuels (GWP-fossil)
  • 0.4452
  • 0.01854
  • 0.02502
  • 0.004
  • 0.004544
  • 0.000071
  • 0.007383
  • -0.0002289
Global Warming Potential - total (GWP-total)
  • 0.4209
  • 0.01855
  • 0.05534
  • 0.004
  • 0.004547
  • 0.000072
  • 0.007394
  • -0.0002337
Global Warming Potential - land use and land use change (GWP-luluc)
  • 0.0003372
  • 0.000005413
  • 0.00002331
  • 3.154E-7
  • 0.000001327
  • 9.826E-8
  • 0.000001815
  • -1.548E-7
  • 0.4562
  • 0.01855
  • 0.02575
  • 0.004
  • 0.004547
  • 0.0000711
  • 0.007385
  • -0.0002449
Eutrophication potential - freshwater (EP-freshwater)
  • 0.000006306
  • 1.414E-7
  • 3.618E-7
  • 1.457E-8
  • 3.465E-8
  • 4.487E-9
  • 8.368E-8
  • -6.085E-9
Eutrophication potential - marine (EP-marine)
  • 0.0004729
  • 0.00002343
  • 0.00002824
  • 0.00001848
  • 0.000005743
  • 1.684E-7
  • 0.0000244
  • -7.147E-7
Eutrophication potential - terrestrial (EP-terrestrial)
  • 0.00512
  • 0.0002592
  • 0.0003041
  • 0.0002
  • 0.00006352
  • 0.00000194
  • 0.0002692
  • -0.000008399
Photochemical Ozone Creation Potential (POCP)
  • 0.001441
  • 0.00008333
  • 0.00008623
  • 0.00005574
  • 0.00002042
  • 5.195E-7
  • 0.00007708
  • -0.000002217
Depletion potential of the stratospheric ozone layer (ODP)
  • 2.2E-8
  • 4.284E-9
  • 1.658E-9
  • 8.64E-10
  • 1.05E-9
  • 1.4E-11
  • 2.795E-9
  • -4.2E-11
Water (user) deprivation potential (WDP)
  • 65.13
  • 0.2212
  • 4.272
  • 0.0117
  • 0.05422
  • 0.2434
  • 1.253
  • -0.1816

IndicatorUnit Production
A1-A3
Transport
A4
Installation
A5
De-construction
C1
Transport
C2
Waste processing
C3
Disposal
C4
Recycling Potential
D
1This impact category deals mainly with the eventual impact of low dose ionizing radiation on human health of the nuclear fuel cycle. It does not consider effects due to possible nuclear accidents, occupational exposure nor due to radioactive waste disposal in underground facilities. Potential ionizing radiation from the soil, from radon and from some construction materials is also not measured by this indicator.
2The results of this environmental impact indicator shall be used with care as the uncertainties on these results are high or as there is limited experiences with the indicator.
Potential Human exposure efficiency relative to U235 (IRP) 1
  • 0.02204
  • 0.00126
  • 0.001655
  • 0.00024
  • 0.0003089
  • 0.000037
  • 0.0009274
  • -0.00003555
Potential incidence of disease due to PM emissions (PM) 2
  • 1.012E-8
  • 1.632E-9
  • 9.58E-10
  • 5.066E-9
  • 4E-10
  • 9E-12
  • 1.401E-9
  • -4.4E-11
Potential Soil quality index (SQP) 2
  • 2.515
  • 0.3308
  • 0.199
  • 0.00669
  • 0.08108
  • 0.001247
  • 0.7821
  • 0.008791
Potential Comparative Toxic Unit for humans - non-cancer effects (HTP-nc) 2
  • 2.061E-9
  • 2.04E-10
  • 1.37E-10
  • 2.8E-11
  • 5E-11
  • 1E-12
  • 8E-11
  • -5E-12
Potential Comparative Toxic Unit for humans - cancer effects (HTP-c) 2
  • 7.7E-11
  • 0
  • 4E-12
  • 1E-12
  • 0
  • 0
  • 5E-12
  • 0
Potential Comparative Toxic Unit for ecosystems (ETP-fw) 2
  • 3.225
  • 0.2109
  • 0.1965
  • 0.0301
  • 0.05169
  • 0.001563
  • 0.1108
  • -0.003987