Close Go back Collapse all sections
Process Data set: Profim Com CV (en) en

Key Data Set Information
Location PL
Geographical representativeness description Worldwide
Reference year 2024
Name
Profim Com CV
Technical purpose of product or process Com is a model characterized by lightness, durability and multifunctionality. With the refined geometry of the seat shell, it is also very comfortable. This chair designed by Paul Brooks is perfect for auditoriums, meeting rooms and canteens. Collection features: - five types of bases allow any configuration - the collection is completed with a barstool on a metal wire frame - the square shape of the shell has four finishing options: plywood, with upholstered seat pad, with seat and backrest pad or fully upholstered - the shell can come in different finishes: lacquered plywood, lined with natural veneer or HPL laminate which is scratch resistant The model studied in detail in this declaration is the Profim Com K42CV fully upholstered in the Xtreme fabric from Camira - including carton box packaging. The key environmental indicators for the other variants/options of the Profim Com CV are presented on a table pages 12 of this declaration.
Classification
Class name : Hierarchy level
  • EPDNorge: Furniture / Soft seating
General comment on data set Data quality: Specific data for the product composition are provided by the manufacturer. They represent the production of the declared product and were collected for EPD development in the year of study. Background data is based on registered EPDs according to EN 15804, Ostfold Research databases, ecoinvent and other LCA databases. The data quality of the raw materials in A1 is presented in the table below. Allocation: The allocation is made in accordance with the provisions of EN 15804. Incoming energy and water and waste production in-house is allocated equally among all products through mass allocation. Effects of primary production of recycled materials is allocated to the main product in which the material was used. The recycling process and transportation of the material is allocated to this analysis. Cut-off criteria: All major raw materials and all the essential energy is included. The production processes for raw materials and energy flows with very small amounts (less than 1%) are not included. These cut-off criteria do not apply for hazardous materials and substances.
Copyright Yes
Owner of data set
Quantitative reference
Reference flow(s)
Biogenic carbon content
  • Carbon content (biogenic): 0.925471697225 kg
  • Carbon content (biogenic) - packaging: 1.732599580846 kg
Time representativeness
Data set valid until 2029
Time representativeness description "2024-04-04" - "2029-04-04"
Technological representativeness
Technology description including background system Product version: K12CV - barstool, plywood shell K22CV - barstool, plywood shell, seat upholstered pad K42CV - barstool, fully upholstered Frame: Wire frame, fi 12 mm.

Indicators of life cycle

IndicatorDirectionUnit Production
A1-A3
Transport
A4
Installation
A5
Maintenance
B2
Repair
B3
Replacement
B4
De-construction
C1
Transport
C2
Waste processing
C3
Disposal
C4
Recycling Potential
D
Input
  • 134.7
  • 0.2089
  • 0.0147
  • 19.88
  • 0.9053
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0.03539
  • 0.09445
  • 0.01794
  • -17.74
Input
  • 51.07
  • 0
  • -22.07
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • -29
  • 0
  • 0
Input
  • 185.8
  • 0.2089
  • -22.06
  • 19.88
  • 0.9053
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0.03539
  • -28.91
  • 0.01794
  • -17.74
Input
  • 235.4
  • 16.59
  • 0.877
  • 108.3
  • 4.876
  • 0
  • 0
  • 2.508
  • 1.085
  • 0.8819
  • -15.58
Input
  • 20.34
  • 0
  • -3.482
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • -16.86
  • 0
  • 0
Input
  • 255.7
  • 16.59
  • -2.605
  • 108.3
  • 4.876
  • 0
  • 0
  • 2.508
  • -15.77
  • 0.8819
  • -15.58
Input
  • 5.096
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
Input
  • 0.4435
  • 0.007305
  • 0.0004823
  • 1.383
  • 0.06265
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0.001267
  • 0.002075
  • 0.0004594
  • 0.05233
Input
  • 0.08373
  • 0.02449
  • 0.001958
  • 0.3697
  • 0.01507
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0.004522
  • 0
  • 0.02758
  • 0.6185
Input
  • 0.2168
  • 0.001889
  • 0.0004155
  • 0.8694
  • 0.00399
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0.0002641
  • 0.001857
  • 0.0008083
  • -0.02333
Output
  • 0.2428
  • 0.0009083
  • 0
  • 0.01871
  • 0.0008389
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0.0001279
  • 0
  • 3.38
  • -0.00808
Output
  • 6.57
  • 1.443
  • 3.834
  • 0.4238
  • 0.01731
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0.1199
  • 0.088
  • 0.0403
  • -0.6893
Output
  • 0.0007343
  • 0.0001133
  • 0
  • 0.0007213
  • 0.00003265
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0.0000171
  • 0
  • 0.000005322
  • -0.000009934
Output
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
Output
  • 0.8328
  • 0
  • 3.528
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 1.728
  • 0
  • 0
Output
  • 0.000006605
  • 0
  • 0.001548
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 7.903
  • 0
  • 0
Output
  • 0.4604
  • 0
  • 0.214
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 2.172
  • 0
  • 0
Output
  • 6.966
  • 0
  • 3.238
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 32.86
  • 0
  • 0

IndicatorUnit Production
A1-A3
Transport
A4
Installation
A5
Maintenance
B2
Repair
B3
Replacement
B4
De-construction
C1
Transport
C2
Waste processing
C3
Disposal
C4
Recycling Potential
D
Abiotic depletion potential - fossil resources (ADPF)
  • 255.6
  • 16.59
  • 0.8769
  • 108.1
  • 4.869
  • 0
  • 0
  • 2.508
  • 1.073
  • 0.8818
  • -15.58
Abiotic depletion potential - non-fossil resources (ADPE)
  • 0.0005955
  • 0.00001822
  • 0.000001512
  • 0.0000434
  • 0.000001689
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0.000004505
  • 7.093E-7
  • 6.602E-7
  • -0.00002828
Acidification potential, Accumulated Exceedance (AP)
  • 0.108
  • 0.004484
  • 0.0002957
  • 0.03219
  • 0.00144
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0.0006798
  • 0.001132
  • 0.0002742
  • -0.009162
Global Warming Potential - biogenic (GWP-biogenic)
  • -9.347
  • 0.0004378
  • 6.353
  • 0.0361
  • 0.001618
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0.00006781
  • 4.062
  • 0.00003243
  • -0.001234
Global Warming Potential - fossil fuels (GWP-fossil)
  • 20.01
  • 1.067
  • 0.06784
  • 5.62
  • 0.2516
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0.1663
  • 0.7706
  • 0.04108
  • -1.719
Global Warming Potential - total (GWP-total)
  • 10.71
  • 1.067
  • 6.421
  • 5.668
  • 0.2538
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0.1664
  • 4.832
  • 0.04112
  • -1.727
Global Warming Potential - land use and land use change (GWP-luluc)
  • 0.04494
  • 0.0003114
  • 0.00002058
  • 0.01266
  • 0.0005745
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0.00005813
  • 0.00003857
  • 0.00001174
  • -0.007198
  • 20.05
  • 1.067
  • 0.06786
  • 5.988
  • 0.2688
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0.1664
  • 1.465
  • 0.04267
  • -2.485
Eutrophication potential - freshwater (EP-freshwater)
  • 0.001215
  • 0.000008134
  • 5.12E-7
  • 0.0005475
  • 0.00002473
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0.000001306
  • 0.000003651
  • 4.085E-7
  • -0.000111
Eutrophication potential - marine (EP-marine)
  • 0.02503
  • 0.001348
  • 0.000103
  • 0.004311
  • 0.000191
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0.0002016
  • 0.0005214
  • 0.00009713
  • -0.002083
Eutrophication potential - terrestrial (EP-terrestrial)
  • 0.2618
  • 0.01491
  • 0.001059
  • 0.0522
  • 0.002318
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0.00223
  • 0.005318
  • 0.001077
  • -0.02159
Photochemical Ozone Creation Potential (POCP)
  • 0.09003
  • 0.004795
  • 0.0003056
  • 0.01353
  • 0.0005935
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0.0006827
  • 0.00134
  • 0.0003095
  • -0.009185
Depletion potential of the stratospheric ozone layer (ODP)
  • 0.000001654
  • 2.465E-7
  • 1.322E-8
  • 4.392E-7
  • 1.953E-8
  • 0
  • 0
  • 3.791E-8
  • 1.812E-8
  • 1.187E-8
  • -0.01377
Water (user) deprivation potential (WDP)
  • 1.309E+4
  • 12.73
  • 1.18
  • 1506
  • 66.97
  • 0
  • 0
  • 2.392
  • 2.773
  • 2.098
  • 45.67

IndicatorUnit Production
A1-A3
Transport
A4
Installation
A5
Maintenance
B2
Repair
B3
Replacement
B4
De-construction
C1
Transport
C2
Waste processing
C3
Disposal
C4
Recycling Potential
D
1This impact category deals mainly with the eventual impact of low dose ionizing radiation on human health of the nuclear fuel cycle. It does not consider effects due to possible nuclear accidents, occupational exposure nor due to radioactive waste disposal in underground facilities. Potential ionizing radiation from the soil, from radon and from some construction materials is also not measured by this indicator.
2The results of this environmental impact indicator shall be used with care as the uncertainties on these results are high or as there is limited experiences with the indicator.
Potential Human exposure efficiency relative to U235 (IRP) 1
  • 0.7385
  • 0.07251
  • 0.003759
  • 0.8896
  • 0.04033
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0.01096
  • 0.003243
  • 0.003553
  • -0.01178
Potential incidence of disease due to PM emissions (PM) 2
  • 0.000001553
  • 9.39E-8
  • 4.391E-9
  • 1.141E-7
  • 4.749E-9
  • 0
  • 0
  • 1.197E-8
  • 1.63E-8
  • 4.945E-9
  • -2.214E-7
Potential Soil quality index (SQP) 2
  • 225.9
  • 19.03
  • 0.6207
  • 25.32
  • 1.131
  • 0
  • 0
  • 1.729
  • 0.2685
  • 1.929
  • -19.04
Potential Comparative Toxic Unit for humans - non-cancer effects (HTP-nc) 2
  • 7.971E-7
  • 1.174E-8
  • 1.446E-9
  • 8.809E-8
  • 3.369E-9
  • 0
  • 0
  • 1.995E-9
  • 7.583E-9
  • 5.73E-10
  • 1.459E-7
Potential Comparative Toxic Unit for humans - cancer effects (HTP-c) 2
  • 1.073E-7
  • 0
  • 3.4E-11
  • 2.793E-9
  • 9.7E-11
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 4.52E-10
  • 1.9E-11
  • -7.625E-9
Potential Comparative Toxic Unit for ecosystems (ETP-fw) 2
  • 1239
  • 12.13
  • 1.158
  • 86.63
  • 3.84
  • 0
  • 0
  • 1.847
  • 5.767
  • 0.5552
  • -99.99