Close Go back Collapse all sections
Process Data set: Profim TrilloPro (en) en

Key Data Set Information
Location PL
Geographical representativeness description Worldwide
Reference year 2024
Name
Profim TrilloPro
Technical purpose of product or process Easy chair, always ready to use. ITO Design studio has created a chair that at the same time fits into a modern office, conference rooms but is also suitable for hybrid work. It will work well for home office, home schooling, or colleges, taking care of user's spine. TrilloPro is modern and slender in form. It's also easy and quick to assemble with the small number of components. The model studied in detail in this declaration is the Profim TrilloPro 20HST upholstered seat in Xtreme fabric from Camira and plastic back - including carton box packaging. The key environmental indicators for the other models and options of the Profim TrilloPro are presented on a table page 12 of this declaration.
Classification
Class name : Hierarchy level
  • EPDNorge: Furniture / Soft seating
General comment on data set Data quality: Specific data for the product composition are provided by the manufacturer. They represent the production of the declared product and were collected for EPD development in the year of study. Background data is based on registered EPDs according to EN 15804, Ostfold Research databases, ecoinvent and other LCA databases. The data quality of the raw materials in A1 is presented in the table below. Allocation: The allocation is made in accordance with the provisions of EN 15804. Incoming energy and water and waste production in-house is allocated equally among all products through mass allocation. Effects of primary production of recycled materials is allocated to the main product in which the material was used. The recycling process and transportation of the material is allocated to this analysis. Cut-off criteria: All major raw materials and all the essential energy is included. The production processes for raw materials and energy flows with very small amounts (less than 1%) are not included. These cut-off criteria do not apply for hazardous materials and substances.
Copyright Yes
Owner of data set
Quantitative reference
Reference flow(s)
Biogenic carbon content
  • Carbon content (biogenic): 0.0 kg
  • Carbon content (biogenic) - packaging: 1.596014151065 kg
Time representativeness
Data set valid until 2029
Time representativeness description 2024-10-10 - 2029-10-10
Technological representativeness
Technology description including background system Backrest: • Plastic backrest available in version entirely plastic or with upholstered cover. • Backrest pad - cut foam with a density of 35 kg/m3. . Armrests: • Fixed. Seat: • Plastic frame molded molded with polyurethane foam with a density of 70 kg/m3. Gas lift: • with additional cushion for a better sitting comfort (version ST). Mechanism: • Synchronous mechanism Self (self-weigh) with the possibility of locking in two positions (basic and maximum reclined). • ST version - with height adjustment function. Base: • 5-star base, polyamide (version ST) or 4-star, aluminium (version HST). Option: • Castors hard or soft, with a brake. Option: teflon glides, black or lightgrey.

Indicators of life cycle

IndicatorDirectionUnit Production
A1-A3
Transport
A4
Installation
A5
Maintenance
B2
Repair
B3
Replacement
B4
De-construction
C1
Transport
C2
Waste processing
C3
Disposal
C4
Recycling Potential
D
Input
  • 120.7
  • 0.2989
  • 0.014
  • 19.88
  • 0.9053
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0.05065
  • 0.1104
  • 0.02806
  • -70.3
Input
  • 20.45
  • 0
  • -20.45
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
Input
  • 141.1
  • 0.2989
  • -20.43
  • 19.88
  • 0.9053
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0.05065
  • 0.1104
  • 0.02806
  • -70.3
Input
  • 689.8
  • 23.75
  • 0.8261
  • 108.3
  • 4.876
  • 0
  • 0
  • 3.589
  • 2.665
  • 1.41
  • -20.92
Input
  • 195.5
  • 0
  • -5.658
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • -189.8
  • 0
  • 0
Input
  • 885.3
  • 23.75
  • -4.832
  • 108.3
  • 4.876
  • 0
  • 0
  • 3.589
  • -187.2
  • 1.41
  • -20.92
Input
  • 7.494
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • -0.000115
Input
  • 1.082
  • 0.01046
  • 0.0004564
  • 1.383
  • 0.06265
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0.001813
  • 0.002597
  • 0.0007387
  • 0.0292
Input
  • 1.267
  • 0.03505
  • 0.001836
  • 0.3697
  • 0.01507
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0.006472
  • 0
  • 0.04003
  • -2.916
Input
  • 0.6353
  • 0.002704
  • 0.0003924
  • 0.8694
  • 0.00399
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0.000378
  • 0.009807
  • 0.001272
  • -0.08617
Output
  • 0.6571
  • 0.0013
  • 0
  • 0.01871
  • 0.0008389
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0.0001831
  • 0
  • 5.5
  • -0.006504
Output
  • 8.672
  • 2.066
  • 3.588
  • 0.4238
  • 0.01731
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0.1715
  • 0.6516
  • 0.1172
  • -0.7351
Output
  • 0.001703
  • 0.0001621
  • 0
  • 0.0007213
  • 0.00003265
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0.00002447
  • 0
  • 0.000008859
  • -0.00005582
Output
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
Output
  • 0.8328
  • 0
  • 3.278
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 1.586
  • 0
  • -0.00001548
Output
  • 0.000006821
  • 0
  • 0.001829
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 13.21
  • 0
  • -0.000001867
Output
  • 0.4604
  • 0
  • 0.1972
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 8.709
  • 0
  • -0.00001175
Output
  • 6.966
  • 0
  • 2.983
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 131.8
  • 0
  • -0.0001778

IndicatorUnit Production
A1-A3
Transport
A4
Installation
A5
Maintenance
B2
Repair
B3
Replacement
B4
De-construction
C1
Transport
C2
Waste processing
C3
Disposal
C4
Recycling Potential
D
Abiotic depletion potential - fossil resources (ADPF)
  • 885.1
  • 23.75
  • 0.826
  • 108.1
  • 4.869
  • 0
  • 0
  • 3.589
  • 2.592
  • 1.41
  • -20.92
Abiotic depletion potential - non-fossil resources (ADPE)
  • 0.01382
  • 0.00002607
  • 0.000001417
  • 0.0000434
  • 0.000001689
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0.000006447
  • 0.000001712
  • 0.000001058
  • -0.00003672
Acidification potential, Accumulated Exceedance (AP)
  • 0.2797
  • 0.006418
  • 0.0002778
  • 0.03219
  • 0.00144
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0.000973
  • 0.004362
  • 0.0004393
  • -0.01232
Global Warming Potential - biogenic (GWP-biogenic)
  • -5.248
  • 0.0006266
  • 5.852
  • 0.0361
  • 0.001618
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0.00009705
  • 0.5977
  • 0.00004956
  • -0.002266
Global Warming Potential - fossil fuels (GWP-fossil)
  • 56.21
  • 1.527
  • 0.06692
  • 5.62
  • 0.2516
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0.238
  • 14.82
  • 0.06474
  • -1.935
Global Warming Potential - total (GWP-total)
  • 51.01
  • 1.528
  • 5.919
  • 5.668
  • 0.2538
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0.2382
  • 15.42
  • 0.0648
  • -1.965
Global Warming Potential - land use and land use change (GWP-luluc)
  • 0.04903
  • 0.0004457
  • 0.0000193
  • 0.01266
  • 0.0005745
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0.0000832
  • 0.00007244
  • 0.00001877
  • -0.02763
  • 56.45
  • 1.528
  • 0.06694
  • 5.988
  • 0.2688
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0.2382
  • 14.78
  • 0.07204
  • -2.523
Eutrophication potential - freshwater (EP-freshwater)
  • 0.00217
  • 0.00001164
  • 4.808E-7
  • 0.0005475
  • 0.00002473
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0.000001869
  • 0.000004083
  • 6.642E-7
  • -0.0001416
Eutrophication potential - marine (EP-marine)
  • 0.06023
  • 0.00193
  • 0.00009991
  • 0.004311
  • 0.000191
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0.0002886
  • 0.002203
  • 0.0001558
  • -0.003306
Eutrophication potential - terrestrial (EP-terrestrial)
  • 0.6233
  • 0.02134
  • 0.0009947
  • 0.0522
  • 0.002318
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0.003191
  • 0.0222
  • 0.001724
  • -0.03508
Photochemical Ozone Creation Potential (POCP)
  • 0.2052
  • 0.006862
  • 0.000288
  • 0.01353
  • 0.0005935
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0.0009771
  • 0.005363
  • 0.0004961
  • -0.01209
Depletion potential of the stratospheric ozone layer (ODP)
  • 0.000003054
  • 3.528E-7
  • 1.244E-8
  • 4.392E-7
  • 1.953E-8
  • 0
  • 0
  • 5.426E-8
  • 3.899E-8
  • 1.898E-8
  • -0.05734
Water (user) deprivation potential (WDP)
  • 1.422E+4
  • 18.22
  • 1.151
  • 1506
  • 66.97
  • 0
  • 0
  • 3.424
  • 4.084
  • 3.183
  • -80.71

IndicatorUnit Production
A1-A3
Transport
A4
Installation
A5
Maintenance
B2
Repair
B3
Replacement
B4
De-construction
C1
Transport
C2
Waste processing
C3
Disposal
C4
Recycling Potential
D
1This impact category deals mainly with the eventual impact of low dose ionizing radiation on human health of the nuclear fuel cycle. It does not consider effects due to possible nuclear accidents, occupational exposure nor due to radioactive waste disposal in underground facilities. Potential ionizing radiation from the soil, from radon and from some construction materials is also not measured by this indicator.
2The results of this environmental impact indicator shall be used with care as the uncertainties on these results are high or as there is limited experiences with the indicator.
Potential Human exposure efficiency relative to U235 (IRP) 1
  • 1.756
  • 0.1038
  • 0.003546
  • 0.8896
  • 0.04033
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0.01569
  • 0.005553
  • 0.005692
  • -0.06785
Potential incidence of disease due to PM emissions (PM) 2
  • 0.000002801
  • 1.344E-7
  • 4.143E-9
  • 1.141E-7
  • 4.749E-9
  • 0
  • 0
  • 1.714E-8
  • 2.726E-8
  • 7.935E-9
  • -4.884E-7
Potential Soil quality index (SQP) 2
  • 205.3
  • 27.24
  • 0.6036
  • 25.32
  • 1.131
  • 0
  • 0
  • 2.475
  • 0.3934
  • 3.082
  • -75.99
Potential Comparative Toxic Unit for humans - non-cancer effects (HTP-nc) 2
  • 0.000001094
  • 1.68E-8
  • 1.347E-9
  • 8.809E-8
  • 3.369E-9
  • 0
  • 0
  • 2.856E-9
  • 2.742E-8
  • 9.39E-10
  • 5.953E-8
Potential Comparative Toxic Unit for humans - cancer effects (HTP-c) 2
  • 9.595E-8
  • 0
  • 3.2E-11
  • 2.793E-9
  • 9.7E-11
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 8.89E-10
  • 3.1E-11
  • -6.654E-9
Potential Comparative Toxic Unit for ecosystems (ETP-fw) 2
  • 1.55E+3
  • 17.37
  • 1.084
  • 86.63
  • 3.84
  • 0
  • 0
  • 2.643
  • 36.28
  • 0.8962
  • -126.5