Close Go back Collapse all sections
Process Data set: Frame Litterbin 240 L (en) en

Key Data Set Information
Location SE
Geographical representativeness description Global.
Reference year 2025
Name
Frame Litterbin 240 L
Use advice for data set Sweden.
Technical purpose of product or process The Frame litterbin has a modern design. The litterbin’s sides taper inwards and upwards from the base, meeting the upper rim at the inner edge. The litterbin can be ordered with an ashtray integrated into the top. Frame is available in two sizes, 120 litres or 240 litres. Made with functionality in mind, the litterbin corresponds to the Frame planters. Ö13-55 Litterbin Frame 240 liters Height: 115 cm Width: 59 cm Depth: 59 cm
Classification
Class name : Hierarchy level
  • EPDNorge: Furniture / Waste containers, Litter boxes
General comment on data set Data quality: Specific data for the product composition are provided by the manufacturer. They represent the production of the declared product and were collected for EPD development in the year of study. Background data is based on registered EPDs according to EN 15804, Ostfold Research databases, ecoinvent and other LCA databases. The data quality of the raw materials in A1 is presented in the table below. Data has been gathered from sub suppliers and public, current, published EPDs or ecoinvent 3.6 database. Allocation: The allocation is made in accordance with the provisions of EN 15804. Incoming energy and water and waste production in-house is allocated equally among all products through mass allocation. Effects of primary production of recycled materials is allocated to the main product in which the material was used. The recycling process and transportation of the material is allocated to this analysis. Allocation as per EN 15804. Impacts from primary production of virgin material are assigned to respective component production and includes transportation. Impacts from repair and replacement are not included in the use stage, as the materials used in the product are designed to last longer than the stated lifespan Impacts from primary production of recycled materials are assigned to respective component production, and includes recycling and transportation processes. Emissions from disposal of the product are included and allocated per material. Energy recovery from incineration of relevant materials is included and allocated on a national level. Cut-off criteria: All major raw materials and all the essential energy is included. The production processes for raw materials and energy flows with very small amounts (less than 1%) are not included. These cut-off criteria do not apply for hazardous materials and substances. Energy flows and materials representing less than 1% of the total are excluded. Cut-off does not apply for REACH materials.
Copyright Yes
Owner of data set
Quantitative reference
Reference flow(s)
Biogenic carbon content
  • Carbon content (biogenic): 0.0 kg
  • Carbon content (biogenic) - packaging: 5.1677083375 kg
Time representativeness
Data set valid until 2030
Time representativeness description 2025-12-08 - 2030-12-08
Technological representativeness

Indicators of life cycle

IndicatorDirectionUnit Production
A1-A3
Transport
A4
Installation
A5
Maintenance
B2
Repair
B3
Replacement
B4
De-construction
C1
Transport
C2
Waste processing
C3
Disposal
C4
Recycling Potential
D
Input
  • 483.8
  • 0.6028
  • 0.08278
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0.1502
  • 0.2574
  • 0.2078
  • -28.44
Input
  • 173.5
  • 0
  • -173.5
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
Input
  • 657.3
  • 0.6028
  • -173.4
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0.1502
  • 0.2574
  • 0.2078
  • -28.44
Input
  • 2534
  • 47.89
  • 4.015
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 10.65
  • 4.505
  • 11.67
  • -220.5
Input
  • 8.069
  • 0
  • -8.069
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
Input
  • 2542
  • 47.89
  • -4.054
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 10.65
  • 4.505
  • 11.67
  • -220.5
Input
  • 0.04149
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
Input
  • 3.564
  • 0.02109
  • 0.00241
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0.005376
  • 0.005471
  • 0.005523
  • 0.9372
Input
  • 160.4
  • 0.07068
  • 0.02709
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0.01919
  • 0
  • 0.2618
  • 26.7
Input
  • 1.607
  • 0.005454
  • 0.002911
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0.001121
  • 0.005101
  • 0.01052
  • -0.06758
Output
  • 1.014
  • 0.002622
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0.0005429
  • 0
  • 46.26
  • -0.1352
Output
  • 104.9
  • 4.166
  • 12.69
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0.5088
  • 2.32
  • 0.3331
  • -10.67
Output
  • 0.00822
  • 0.000327
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0.00007258
  • 0
  • 0.00007234
  • 0.00006266
Output
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
Output
  • 13.9
  • 0
  • 0.09728
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 23.65
  • 0
  • 0
Output
  • 0
  • 0
  • 12.4
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 72.01
  • 0
  • 0
Output
  • 0
  • 0
  • 8.624
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 1.933
  • 0
  • 0
Output
  • 0
  • 0
  • 130.5
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 29.24
  • 0
  • 0

IndicatorUnit Production
A1-A3
Transport
A4
Installation
A5
Maintenance
B2
Repair
B3
Replacement
B4
De-construction
C1
Transport
C2
Waste processing
C3
Disposal
C4
Recycling Potential
D
Abiotic depletion potential - fossil resources (ADPF)
  • 2.54E+3
  • 47.89
  • 4.015
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 10.64
  • 4.266
  • 11.67
  • -220.6
Abiotic depletion potential - non-fossil resources (ADPE)
  • 0.1067
  • 0.00005258
  • 0.000005535
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0.00001912
  • 0.000003648
  • 0.000008846
  • -0.0004499
Acidification potential, Accumulated Exceedance (AP)
  • 1.151
  • 0.01294
  • 0.002723
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0.002886
  • 0.003172
  • 0.003588
  • -0.1302
Global Warming Potential - biogenic (GWP-biogenic)
  • -18.59
  • 0.001264
  • 18.95
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0.0002878
  • 0.00687
  • 0.0003753
  • -0.01459
Global Warming Potential - fossil fuels (GWP-fossil)
  • 218.7
  • 3.079
  • 0.3514
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0.7059
  • 5.761
  • 0.4948
  • -26.12
Global Warming Potential - total (GWP-total)
  • 200.3
  • 3.081
  • 19.3
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0.7065
  • 5.768
  • 0.4953
  • -26.15
Global Warming Potential - land use and land use change (GWP-luluc)
  • 0.2337
  • 0.0008989
  • 0.00008742
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0.0002468
  • 0.0001858
  • 0.0001531
  • -0.01582
  • 219.1
  • 3.081
  • 0.3515
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0.7064
  • 5.761
  • 0.5002
  • -26.15
Eutrophication potential - freshwater (EP-freshwater)
  • 0.01295
  • 0.00002348
  • 0.000004062
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0.000005544
  • 0.00001453
  • 0.000004849
  • -0.001611
Eutrophication potential - marine (EP-marine)
  • 0.2211
  • 0.003892
  • 0.001178
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0.0008558
  • 0.001186
  • 0.001283
  • -0.02707
Eutrophication potential - terrestrial (EP-terrestrial)
  • 2.533
  • 0.04304
  • 0.0125
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0.009465
  • 0.01263
  • 0.0142
  • -0.2769
Photochemical Ozone Creation Potential (POCP)
  • 1.063
  • 0.01384
  • 0.003217
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0.002898
  • 0.003705
  • 0.004089
  • -0.1313
Depletion potential of the stratospheric ozone layer (ODP)
  • 0.000013
  • 7.115E-7
  • 5.463E-8
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 1.609E-7
  • 6.718E-8
  • 1.582E-7
  • -0.00881
Water (user) deprivation potential (WDP)
  • 2.552E+4
  • 36.74
  • 6.304
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 10.15
  • -4.063
  • 21.16
  • 1327

IndicatorUnit Production
A1-A3
Transport
A4
Installation
A5
Maintenance
B2
Repair
B3
Replacement
B4
De-construction
C1
Transport
C2
Waste processing
C3
Disposal
C4
Recycling Potential
D
1This impact category deals mainly with the eventual impact of low dose ionizing radiation on human health of the nuclear fuel cycle. It does not consider effects due to possible nuclear accidents, occupational exposure nor due to radioactive waste disposal in underground facilities. Potential ionizing radiation from the soil, from radon and from some construction materials is also not measured by this indicator.
2The results of this environmental impact indicator shall be used with care as the uncertainties on these results are high or as there is limited experiences with the indicator.
Potential Human exposure efficiency relative to U235 (IRP) 1
  • 12.48
  • 0.2093
  • 0.01461
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0.04653
  • 0.01339
  • 0.04654
  • 0.08233
Potential incidence of disease due to PM emissions (PM) 2
  • 0.00001834
  • 2.71E-7
  • 3.34E-8
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 5.082E-8
  • 1.247E-7
  • 6.618E-8
  • -0.000002219
Potential Soil quality index (SQP) 2
  • 2962
  • 54.94
  • 2.324
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 7.339
  • 1.024
  • 25.19
  • -27.93
Potential Comparative Toxic Unit for humans - non-cancer effects (HTP-nc) 2
  • 0.000007873
  • 3.388E-8
  • 2.408E-8
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 8.47E-9
  • 2.561E-8
  • 5.969E-9
  • 0.00000271
Potential Comparative Toxic Unit for humans - cancer effects (HTP-c) 2
  • 0.000001691
  • 0
  • 5.02E-10
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 3.721E-9
  • 2.33E-10
  • -1.253E-7
Potential Comparative Toxic Unit for ecosystems (ETP-fw) 2
  • 1.054E+4
  • 35.03
  • 4.56
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 7.84
  • 40.95
  • 6.622
  • -1459