Close Go back Collapse all sections
Process Data set: Champ (en) en

Key Data Set Information
Location SE
Geographical representativeness description World Wide
Reference year 2025
Name
Champ
Use advice for data set Fabric used in the calculation is Camira Oceanic, a 100% post-consumer recycled polyester A3 Data Collection (Production Phase) Data for the A3 module, encompassing the production phase, was collected in 2020. This data includes all relevant inputs and outputs associated with manufacturing processes. A4 Data Collection (Transport to Customer) Transport data for the A4 module was sourced from Trafa.se and reflects operations during the years 2021-2022. According to statistics from Trafikanalys, the average distance covered by a Swedish heavy-duty truck transporting furniture in domestic traffic was approximately 143 kilometers in 2022, with an average of 153 kilometers for the period 2012–2022. These values are based on representative industry conditions and account for the most recent data on logistics efficiency and route optimization. A5 Data (Packaging Disposal) For the A5 module, it is assumed that packaging materials are automatically handled and disposed of in alignment with standard waste management practices at this stage. This assumption aligns with typical end-of-life scenarios for packaging in regulated waste systems. Maintenance Data (B2 Module) Maintenance requirements are calculated based on typical cleaning scenarios over the product's lifespan, assumed to be 15 years: Wet cleaning: Water consumption is estimated at 0.0005 m³ (equivalent to 0.5 liters) per cleaning session, with cleaning occurring once per week for 15 years.
Technical purpose of product or process A versatile and well-balanced duo, Champ Pouf and Champ Table share a cohesive design language with soft, organic shapes and a refined silhouette. The pouf offers a comfortable seating option, while the table provides a functional surface, making them ideal for dynamic and flexible interiors. Their rounded contours and well-proportioned forms create a harmonious and inviting expression. Champ broadens Johanson’s range with a compact and adaptable design. Perfect for lounge areas, hotel lobbies, and collaborative workspaces, the pouf and table can be used individually or together to create stylish and functional settings. Available exclusively with a RAL Structure finish, Champ ensures durability and a high-quality aesthetic. With Johanson’s flexible production, a wide selection of upholstery options allows for personalized and distinctive interior solutions. This declaration focuses on an in-depth study of Champ Pouf The table on page 12 of this declaration provides the key environmental indicators for the other models within the product family
Classification
Class name : Hierarchy level
  • EPDNorge: Furniture / Soft seating
General comment on data set Data quality: Specific data for the product composition are provided by the manufacturer. They represent the production of the declared product and were collected for EPD development in the year of study. Background data is based on registered EPDs according to EN 15804, Ostfold Research databases, ecoinvent and other LCA databases. The data quality of the raw materials in A1 is presented in the table below. Allocation: The allocation is made in accordance with the provisions of EN 15804. Incoming energy and water and waste production in-house is allocated equally among all products through mass allocation. Effects of primary production of recycled materials is allocated to the main product in which the material was used. The recycling process and transportation of the material is allocated to this analysis. Cut-off criteria: All major raw materials and all the essential energy is included. The production processes for raw materials and energy flows with very small amounts (less than 1%) are not included. These cut-off criteria do not apply for hazardous materials and substances.
Copyright Yes
Owner of data set
Quantitative reference
Reference flow(s)
  • - 1.0 * 1.0 Stück (Number of pieces)
Biogenic carbon content
  • Carbon content (biogenic): 1.25841750902 kg
  • Carbon content (biogenic) - packaging: 0.72222222228 kg
Time representativeness
Data set valid until 2030
Time representativeness description 2025-02-21 - 2030-02-21
Technological representativeness
Technology description including background system Complied with technical standards: EN 16139:2013 Furniture - Strength, durability and safety - Requirements for non-domestic seating EN 15372:2024 Furniture - Strength, durability and safety - Requirements for non-domestic tables. Test severity 2 Möbelfakta certified You can find all certifications and test results here: https://johansondesign.com/downloads/certificate

Indicators of life cycle

IndicatorDirectionUnit Production
A1-A3
Transport
A4
Installation
A5
Maintenance
B2
Repair
B3
Replacement
B4
De-construction
C1
Transport
C2
Waste processing
C3
Disposal
C4
Recycling Potential
D
Input
  • 104.7
  • 0.0366
  • 0.005812
  • 0.3918
  • 0.2354
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0.02175
  • 0.04394
  • 0.006275
  • -27.25
Input
  • 37.4
  • 0
  • -9.126
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • -32.31
  • 0
  • 0
Input
  • 142.1
  • 0.0366
  • -9.12
  • 0.3918
  • 0.2354
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0.02175
  • -32.26
  • 0.006275
  • -27.25
Input
  • 244.3
  • 2.557
  • 0.3531
  • 2.704
  • 2.768
  • 0
  • 0
  • 1.52
  • 1.444
  • 0.2424
  • -7.393
Input
  • 65.07
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0.7605
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • -65.07
  • 0
  • 0
Input
  • 309.3
  • 2.557
  • 0.3531
  • 2.704
  • 3.528
  • 0
  • 0
  • 1.52
  • -63.62
  • 0.2424
  • -7.393
Input
  • 2.81
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
Input
  • 0.2276
  • 0.001309
  • 0.0001928
  • 0.0263
  • 0.008966
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0.0007783
  • 0.001036
  • 0.0001619
  • 0.008235
Input
  • 0.313
  • 0.004682
  • 0.0007947
  • 0.02908
  • 0.002242
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0.002783
  • 0
  • 0.01854
  • -1.224
Input
  • 0.4338
  • 0.0002734
  • 0.0001666
  • 0.3926
  • 0.004094
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0.0001625
  • 0.005022
  • 0.0002192
  • -0.03328
Output
  • 3.375
  • 0.0001319
  • 0
  • 0.07543
  • 0.0006295
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0.00007838
  • 0
  • 0.8513
  • -0.002072
Output
  • 3.047
  • 0.1243
  • 1.56
  • 0.02774
  • 0.07354
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0.07391
  • 0.03
  • 0.04734
  • -0.2501
Output
  • 0.01383
  • 0.00001742
  • 0
  • 0.00001338
  • 0.000008862
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0.00001035
  • 0
  • 0.000001479
  • -0.0000219
Output
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
Output
  • 0.04224
  • 0
  • 1.451
  • 0.01586
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0.4078
  • 0
  • 0
Output
  • 0.0699
  • 0
  • 0.000002124
  • 0.0358
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 5.069
  • 0
  • 0
Output
  • 0.04536
  • 0
  • 0.08923
  • 0.00004385
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 3.502
  • 0
  • 0
Output
  • 0.6863
  • 0
  • 1.35
  • 0.0006634
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 52.98
  • 0
  • 0

IndicatorUnit Production
A1-A3
Transport
A4
Installation
A5
Maintenance
B2
Repair
B3
Replacement
B4
De-construction
C1
Transport
C2
Waste processing
C3
Disposal
C4
Recycling Potential
D
Abiotic depletion potential - fossil resources (ADPF)
  • 271.9
  • 2.557
  • 0.353
  • 2.701
  • 2.767
  • 0
  • 0
  • 1.52
  • 1.44
  • 0.2424
  • -7.395
Abiotic depletion potential - non-fossil resources (ADPE)
  • 0.0002108
  • 0.000004671
  • 6.142E-7
  • 0.000004079
  • 0.000003781
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0.000002776
  • 6.94E-7
  • 1.769E-7
  • -0.000009237
Acidification potential, Accumulated Exceedance (AP)
  • 0.09501
  • 0.000486
  • 0.0001195
  • 0.0009302
  • 0.002087
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0.0002889
  • 0.002855
  • 0.00007836
  • -0.004303
Global Warming Potential - biogenic (GWP-biogenic)
  • -7.009
  • 0.00006999
  • 2.648
  • 0.001046
  • 0.0006421
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0.0000416
  • 4.615
  • 0.000009064
  • -0.0008294
Global Warming Potential - fossil fuels (GWP-fossil)
  • 17.78
  • 0.1691
  • 0.02524
  • 0.222
  • 0.1596
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0.1005
  • 3.011
  • 0.01355
  • -0.6647
Global Warming Potential - total (GWP-total)
  • 10.82
  • 0.1692
  • 2.673
  • 0.2233
  • 0.1603
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0.1006
  • 7.626
  • 0.01356
  • -0.6763
Global Warming Potential - land use and land use change (GWP-luluc)
  • 0.03937
  • 0.00006018
  • 0.000008346
  • 0.0002822
  • 0.000129
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0.00003577
  • 0.0000243
  • 0.000003361
  • -0.01069
  • 18.06
  • 0.1692
  • 0.02524
  • 0.2231
  • 0.1603
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0.1006
  • 3.608
  • 0.01382
  • -0.8501
Eutrophication potential - freshwater (EP-freshwater)
  • 0.001539
  • 0.000001351
  • 2.072E-7
  • 0.00001285
  • 0.000008077
  • 0
  • 0
  • 8.03E-7
  • 0.000001571
  • 1.525E-7
  • -0.00004926
Eutrophication potential - marine (EP-marine)
  • 0.02112
  • 0.00009615
  • 0.00003952
  • 0.0001554
  • 0.0001609
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0.00005715
  • 0.001553
  • 0.00002718
  • -0.001193
Eutrophication potential - terrestrial (EP-terrestrial)
  • 0.2092
  • 0.001076
  • 0.0004279
  • 0.001793
  • 0.001684
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0.0006393
  • 0.01506
  • 0.0003027
  • -0.01268
Photochemical Ozone Creation Potential (POCP)
  • 0.06367
  • 0.000412
  • 0.000123
  • 0.0005626
  • 0.0006267
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0.0002449
  • 0.003597
  • 0.00008632
  • -0.004255
Depletion potential of the stratospheric ozone layer (ODP)
  • 0.000001389
  • 3.83E-8
  • 5.327E-9
  • 2.159E-8
  • 1.601E-8
  • 0
  • 0
  • 2.277E-8
  • 1.768E-8
  • 3.199E-9
  • -0.02228
Water (user) deprivation potential (WDP)
  • 1121
  • 2.473
  • 0.4474
  • 42.56
  • 9.908
  • 0
  • 0
  • 1.47
  • 4.361
  • 0.8533
  • -35.83

IndicatorUnit Production
A1-A3
Transport
A4
Installation
A5
Maintenance
B2
Repair
B3
Replacement
B4
De-construction
C1
Transport
C2
Waste processing
C3
Disposal
C4
Recycling Potential
D
1This impact category deals mainly with the eventual impact of low dose ionizing radiation on human health of the nuclear fuel cycle. It does not consider effects due to possible nuclear accidents, occupational exposure nor due to radioactive waste disposal in underground facilities. Potential ionizing radiation from the soil, from radon and from some construction materials is also not measured by this indicator.
2The results of this environmental impact indicator shall be used with care as the uncertainties on these results are high or as there is limited experiences with the indicator.
Potential Human exposure efficiency relative to U235 (IRP) 1
  • 0.6882
  • 0.01117
  • 0.001511
  • 0.01754
  • 0.008887
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0.006642
  • 0.002422
  • 0.001003
  • -0.02664
Potential incidence of disease due to PM emissions (PM) 2
  • 0.000001392
  • 1.035E-8
  • 1.763E-9
  • 8.873E-9
  • 9.106E-9
  • 0
  • 0
  • 6.153E-9
  • 1.396E-8
  • 1.333E-9
  • -1.824E-7
Potential Soil quality index (SQP) 2
  • 399.7
  • 1.788
  • 0.2368
  • 0.9583
  • 0.9577
  • 0
  • 0
  • 1.063
  • 0.1763
  • 0.5627
  • -29.46
Potential Comparative Toxic Unit for humans - non-cancer effects (HTP-nc) 2
  • 3.753E-7
  • 2.07E-9
  • 5.91E-10
  • 8.922E-9
  • 3.356E-9
  • 0
  • 0
  • 1.231E-9
  • 1.306E-8
  • 2.64E-10
  • 1.474E-8
Potential Comparative Toxic Unit for humans - cancer effects (HTP-c) 2
  • 4.52E-8
  • 0
  • 1.4E-11
  • 4.7E-10
  • 4.26E-10
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 3.4E-10
  • 7E-12
  • -2.162E-9
Potential Comparative Toxic Unit for ecosystems (ETP-fw) 2
  • 793.9
  • 1.895
  • 0.4708
  • 4.281
  • 3.78
  • 0
  • 0
  • 1.127
  • 8.778
  • 0.199
  • -43.8